Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
Ain’t that America

Ain’t that America

Last updated on: February 18, 2025 at 6:20 pm by Fred Clark

0 Comments

Ain’t that America 2025-02-18T18:20:02-05:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

John Mellencamp’s Top-10 1983 hit “Pink Houses” was such a feel-good patriotic love letter to the American dream that Ronald Reagan wanted to use it as a theme song for his 1984 re-election campaign. Mellencamp didn’t let him.

Decades later, the anti-gay “National Organization for Marriage” tried to vicariously borrow Mellencamp’s patriotism by using the song in their anti-marriage equality campaign. He sent them a cease-and-desist letter, denouncing their bigotry and urging them to “find music from a source more in harmony with your views.”

It’s not surprising that this song would be so attractive to political campaigns. Just look at the video, which is full of the kind of gauzy red-white-and-blue b-roll that used to dominate election ads on TV:

Mellencamp’s video includes a few dissonant notes — signs that the American Dream he’s celebrating is mostly aspirational, and in many ways literally falling apart. The crumbling barns and ramshackle homes seen here wouldn’t make the final edit of a campaign ad. But there’s still more than enough stock footage of heartland Americana, Old Glory, amber waves, and purple mountain’s majesty to piece together a 30-second spot.

They still make political campaign ads with that kind of rah-rah American imagery sometimes, although they’re outnumbered by the apparently more effective ads of the grainy, fear-mongering, two-minutes-hate variety — ads warning that “They” are coming to take away your home and children and precious bodily fluids.

The good news for Mellencamp is that Republicans have now finally given up trying to conscript his song for their political crusade. They used to love “Pink Houses,” but now they reject it as “woke.” It’s a violation of the new administration’s official rules for MAGAfication.

This is partly due to the opening image of the song, which invites listeners to identify with a Black homeowner as their neighbor, their representative, and their compatriot. But the final verse of Mellencamp’s song violates another of the administration’s new rules:

Well, there’s people and more people
What do they know, know, know?
Go to work in some high-rise
And vacation down at the Gulf of Mexico, ooh, yeah

I always figured that line was Mellencamp’s way of insisting this wasn’t just a Springsteen pastiche. These folks aren’t vacationing down the Shore in Jersey. They’re from middle America, in between those coasts, so they head down to the Gulf of Mexico.

But in MAGAmerica we’re not allowed to say “Gulf of Mexico.”

When Trump first muttered something about renaming the Gulf of Mexico during one of his babbling, stream-of-consciousness campaign riffs it seemed like an off-hand joke — a spur-of-the-moment whim that was silly, shallow, ignorant, and kinda racist. Sometimes a 78-year-old man who does lots of Adderall just says things. You know how Grampa gets sometimes.

But Trump’s “joke” has turned into an executive order directing everyone who works for the executive branch of the federal government to henceforth refer to the Gulf of Mexico only as the “Gulf of America.” The executive order doesn’t require anybody in Congress, or in the judiciary, or in any state government, or any private citizen anywhere to use this silly new name. Executive orders are not imperial decrees or magic spells that can change what existing maps say, or what 40-year-old pop songs say, or what everyone in the world has said up until now.

But Trump’s goofily chauvinist attempt to rename the Gulf of Mexico serves as a kind of loyalty test for him and for the new “competitive authoritarian” regime he is attempting to create, shredding the checks and balances of democratic government.

It’s a two-part loyalty test, requiring the MAGA faithful not just to refuse to call the Gulf of Mexico the Gulf of Mexico, but to actively endorse the pretense that a president’s executive order is an imperial decree and a magic spell and that president’s are wizard-kings capable of altering reality with the stroke of a pen.

Loyalty tests like this are why the reign of Trump is unsettling and precarious even for his biggest supporters. It doesn’t matter if you’re happy to play along with any and every whim that strikes the fancy of the president or his billionaire sidekick. You still have to keep up. Every day. You have to be vigilant and ready to change how you talk — to adopt new words and abandon old ones — at the drop of a hat.

Because if you don’t keep up, you might very easily say something that used to be acceptable but that became unacceptable yesterday. “The Mississippi River flows into the Gulf of America,” you say, signaling your loyalty and your membership in the tier of those who enjoy the privileges reserved for the loyal. But you didn’t keep up. That was last week’s loyalty signal and last week’s loyalty language. You said “Mississippi River” instead of using the Trump-mandated new name, “River of America” and now you must be punished.

As much as liberals and lefties and Democrats have been reeling at the accelerating pace of Trump’s Gleichschaltung, that rapidly changing landscape is even more difficult for those attempting to maintain their good standing as loyal supporters of his new world order. They’re no longer sure, day to day, what they are and are not allowed to do or say or think. Things that were previously unremarkable and uncontroversial have suddenly become partisan flashpoints, culture-war loyalty tests, and new grounds for marginalization and punishment The face-eating leopards are always hungry.

MAGA faithful were prepared to hate transgender people and nonwhite immigrants and 10th-generation nonwhite citizens. But now they’re required to hate cartographers, and Lutherans, and private charities, and NATO, and Canada, and missionaries, and farmers, and Dolly Parton, too, probably. And they have no idea what arbitrary new things they’ll be required to hate tomorrow.

Thinking about this had me re-reading an old post here from January 2016, from just before the Republican primary elections began that year: “A Ted Cruz win could further Bartonize ‘mainstream’ white evangelicalism.” In that post I worried that two mainstream, generally conservative evangelical professors I’ve long read online might become abruptly disfavored due to their excellent work critiquing grifter pseudo-historian David Barton. At the time — early 2016 — Barton was still a fringe figure even among lockstep Republican evangelicalism. His brand of bogus history in support of explicit white-/Christian nationalism was seen as goofy, transparently false, and unrespectable. If that changed — if Bartonism became “mainstream” white evangelical dogma — then my friends would find themselves in trouble — in serious, like, Rich Cizik, Larycia Hawkins trouble.

Considering what has happened since 2016 to both Warren Throckmorton and his former home of Grove City College, that post seems kind of prescient now. Some parts of it haven’t aged well because before those primaries in 2016 I really didn’t think Trump could capture control of the entire GOP.

But there’s a sense in which the now out-of-date parts of that post reinforce the point I was making there, and here. Consider the final paragraph:

But somebody is going to win that Republican nomination, and whoever that turns out to be — Cruz, Trump, Rubio, Bush — the gatekeepers of white evangelicalism will fall in line, and the boundaries will be redrawn, redefining what is and is not acceptable speech and behavior within the tribe. At that point, anybody might become suddenly redefined as “controversial” — whether a Barton critic or an advocate of refugee resettlement like Russell Moore.

The Russell Moore reference there was over-the-top hyperbole. In January 2016 Moore was the unimpeachably conservative chief spokesman for the Southern Baptist Convention. He was a disciple and protege of Al Mohler — the executor and executioner of the fundamentalist purge of the SBC in the 1990s. Moore was, at that time, best known as a bomb-throwing culture warrior on social media, notorious for blocking anybody who questioned his right-wing pronouncements there.

The bit about refugee resettlement was also over-the-top hyperbole. In 2016, refugee resettlement was supported by ultra-conservative fundamentalist Southern Baptists, as it had been for more than a century. But that long tradition of supporting — and funding — refugee resettlement as “home missions” evaporated and reversed itself over the past nine years. And Russell Moore is now a pariah to the SBC, not because he changed, but because he failed — refused — to keep up with the changes required by MAGAfication.

If that could happen to Moore, it could happen to any other “conservative.” And it will happen to them, tomorrow or next week or next month, if they don’t scrupulously keep pace and keep track and obediently adapt every new change in language and behavior and opinion required of them.

Anyway, here’s John Mellencamp performing “Pink Houses” at Farm Aid in 2005, back when even Republicans were still allowed to say that Farm Aid was a Good Thing:

Uncategorized

Previous Post

February 17, 2025

'The Path to American Authoritarianism'

Next Post

February 20, 2025 Postcards from America (02.20.25)

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

""Do your worst, I have already won" lol"

Daniel McLellan

Cycling down the widening gyre

"Their power level clearly didn't go up to five thousaaaaaaaaaaaaand!(I mean, honestly, good on that ..."

Jim Roberts

Cycling down the widening gyre

"Doing training at work on spotting Deepfakes.But why is it every example Deepfake looks so... ..."

Two Pi Man

Cycling down the widening gyre

"Truss has always claimed that her plan would have led to success if only the ..."

Two Pi Man

Cycling down the widening gyre

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What Christian tradition is associated with the seven sacraments?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Quakerism Protestantism Seventh-day Adventism Roman Catholicism