Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
LBCF: ‘No change of power’

LBCF: ‘No change of power’

Last updated on: November 1, 2024 at 3:33 pm by Fred Clark

0 Comments

LBCF: ‘No change of power’ 2024-11-01T15:33:03-04:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

(Originally posted June, 2005.)

Left Behind, pp. 102-104

These pages find Rayford Steele on the edge of a spiritual crisis. Steele thinks of himself as a man’s man, self-reliant, capable and proud. Here, for the first time, he begins to experience self-doubt:

Would it mean admitting that he didn’t know everything? That he had relied on himself and that now he felt stupid and weak and worthless? He could admit that. After a lifetime of achieving, of excelling, of being better than most and the best in most circles, he had been as humbled as was possible in one stroke.

That last sentence is wonderfully ambivalent. If Rayford is really “as humbled as possible” then what’s with all the boasting about being “the best in most circles”?

On the one hand, Rayford has finally begun to question his own self-sufficiency. There’s a genuinely Christian element here. For a less evangelical take on Rayford’s dilemma, consider the analogous language of AA and the other 12-step programs. Rayford imagines he is at rock bottom and considers, for the first time, the possibility of “letting go and letting God.”

But on the other hand, he doesn’t quite seem willing to let go. This might be an honest, even artful, depiction of the beginnings of a spiritual struggle except that L&J seem to share Rayford’s ambivalence.

He has lost one child, his young son, but not the other, his college-age daughter. We’ve already seen L&J’s explanation for this — Raymie was younger than the “age of reason” so he automatically receives the free ticket to heaven. Chloe is an adult who, like her father, was free to choose otherwise and thus, like her father, is “left behind.” Yet Rayford here looks for some further explanation for why his son was raptured/killed/saved and his daughter was not.

It wasn’t simply Raymie’s age and innocence that had allowed his mother’s influence to affect him so. It was his spirit. He didn’t have the killer instinct, the “me first” attitude Rayford thought he would need to succeed in the real world. He wasn’t effeminate, but Rayford had worried that he might be a mama’s boy — too compassionate, too sensitive, too caring. He was always looking out for someone else when Rayford thought he should be looking out for number one.

L&J acknowledge that self-reliance can be a kind of idolatry, or at least an obstacle to the surrender of self involved in surrender to God. They even approach the idea that some of our cultural notions of “manliness” contribute to this myth of self-reliance.

But at the same time, they like this notion of manly self-reliance — as demonstrated by that blurted out non-sequitur insistence that Raymie “wasn’t effeminate.” They want to be Buck and Steele — manly, capable men, “the best in most circles.” They can admit a need for God but not, you know, in some sissified way that would undermine their steely, young-buck macho self-reliance.

There’s a hint here of something I can’t quite fully suss out. An interconnectedness of L&J’s reflexive homophobia, their insistence on rigid gender roles and male dominance, and the strange notions of power and magic that color their notions of salvation. More on this later.

Left Behind, pp. 104-105

Remember that whole “Rapture” thing? Yeah, well, we’re done with that now.

Left Behind is often described as a novel about the Rapture and what happens afterward, but that’s not really accurate. It’s a novel about a whole series of events supposedly prophesied. These events are familiar to all adherents of the premillennial dispensational “prophecy” perspective. First the believers and innocents will be raptured. Then the Antichrist will rise. Then comes a series of judgments — the seas turn to blood, the four horsemen bring famine, war, disease and death, dogs and cats sleeping together, mass hysteria.

The odd thing about LB — and all the earlier PMD, last days novels that it derives from — is that these events are never portrayed as connected. As these books recount their checklists of prophecy, A, B, C, D and E all happen, but they do not flow out of one another. They are unrelated, discrete occurrences. LaHaye and Jenkins tell us about the Rapture, and then they tell us about the rise of the Antichrist, but the two things are jarringly disconnected. It seems almost like we’re beginning a new, separate novel here on page 104.

Buck Williams arrives at the seedy Midpoint Motel “a few miles from the tiny Waukegan Airport.” Buck looks at the decrepit motel room and wonders “what two places in the world this dive was midpoint between. Whatever they were, either had to be better.” That’s a joke. It’s even a pretty good joke. (I want to be fair here and offer praise where we can. Particularly since we’re about to encounter some of the worst writing in the book.)

The dismal room does have the one thing Buck cannot survive without: a telephone. It’s been a long walk from the limo, where Buck had paid $50 to use the driver’s car phone, to the motel room. Ten or 20 minutes may have passed since Buck was last able to use the phone, so he immediately dials his voicemail. He had no new messages, so:

… he listened to his saved message from Dirk Burton, which reminded him why he had felt it so important to get to London.

Dirk, you’ll recall, is Buck’s conspiratorial source with connections to the mysterious cabal of international power brokers who secretly run the world from behind the scenes. You might think that the world-shaking events of the previous 36 hours would have also shaken the agenda and activities of these unelected, world-governing puppeteers and that they would now be scrambling to respond to the drastic changes in the world they thought they controlled. But no.

Dirk’s message makes it clear that the cabal is continuing its previous agenda as though nothing had happened. They seem unaffected, unphased by the dissappearance of nearly 2 billion people. Their political schemes are unaltered by the upheaval of the entire previous political landscape.

“Let me tell you something major,” Dirk says. In the immediate aftermath of the mass disappearances, it takes someone with an unhealthy tunnel-vision to think that “something major” could mean anything other than, say, revealing what happened to all those people, or what might happen next. But what Dirk means by “something major” is instead this: an unscheduled special election in Romania:

The big man, your compatriot, the one I call the supreme power broker internationally, met here the other day with the one I call our muckety-muck. You know who I mean. There was a third party at the meeting. All I know is that he’s from Europe, probably Eastern Europe. I don’t know what their plans are for him, but apparently something on a huge scale. …

Something is cooking, and I don’t even want to suggest what it is other than in person. Visit me as soon as you can. In case that’s not possible, let me just encourage this: Watch the news for the installation of a new leader in Europe. If you say, as I did, that no elections are scheduled and no changes of power are imminent, you’ll get my drift.

“No changes of power are imminent,” Dirk says. Buck and the authors seem to think this is a reasonable statement. Weren’t they paying any attention to the previous 100+ pages?

Let’s review: All the Christians in the world have disappeared. Even presuming that LaHaye and Jenkins have a very limited notion of who makes the cut as a “true” Christian, it’s at least possible that some elected official, somewhere in the world is among the disappeared.

But that’s the least of it. The world is in chaos. Nothing, absolutely nothing, will ever be the same. Apart from the hundreds of millions of adult “true” Christians who are suddenly gone there is also the matter of the billion or so children — as in all the children. The disappearance of the children would utterly change the political, economic and social fabric of every nation, city and village on earth.

“No changes of power are imminent”? No. Rather, every leader on the planet would now find their position in jeopardy — from the now irrelevant school boards on up to the presidents and kings. Parents the world around would be rioting, taking to the barricades.

This context of global chaos — the carnage of accidents and plane crashes, the ensuing economic collapse, the bewildering anguish of the missing children — would be fertile ground for would-be totalitarian rulers. Leaders already in power would be declaring martial law, suspending civil liberties and assuming for themselves sweeping new powers while reassuring their constituents that such steps were necessary to restore order. Many of the leaders who refused to take such steps would quickly be overthrown, replaced by more ambitious strongmen who saw this as their opportunity for revolution.

None of that happens in Left Behind.

The Rapture was a self-contained prophetic event confined to the first 100 pages of the book. It has no aftermath, no repercussions, as the authors move on to the next self-contained prophetic event: the rise of the global government of the Antichrist.

The post-Rapture chaos and political tumult could easily have led to the rise of such an authoritarian, worldwide leader, except that for L&J it doesn’t lead to much of anything. To explain the rise of Nicolae “Sundance” Carpathia, they resort instead to a half-assed conspiracy of international power brokers and an unrecognizably capable and powerful United Nations.

All of which is evidence that Carpathia is not qualified to be Antichrist. The fact that he fails to recognize the political opportunity presented by the post-Rapture chaos proves that he lacks the diabolical, power-mad instincts the job requires.

Likewise, the fact that Stonagal & Co. fail to recognize such an opportunity proves that they are not qualified to act as a shadow government. The fact that Dirk Burton is unable to adapt his conspiracy theories to account for the recent cataclysm shows that he is not qualified to serve as our haunted man-who-knows-too-much. The fact that Buck reads that “no changes in power are imminent” and nods along in agreement proves that he is not qualified to serve as the world’s foremost investigative reporter.

And, of course, the fact that LaHaye and Jenkins created all these woefully unqualified characters, and that they concocted such a worldwide catastrophe without ever imagining any repercussions beyond the difficulty of getting from O’Hare to Naperville proves, again, that they are not qualified to write anything worth reading.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

October 30, 2024

Say their names: Savita. Josseli.

Next Post

November 3, 2024 Sunday reading

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"Powdered milk? No problem."Fresh" liquid whole milk? *Definite* problem!(Although I can see where busy people ..."

reynard61

The purpose-driven labor priest

"Adam Kotsko gets righteously indignant about this same piece here. https://adamkotsko.substack.com/p/no-evaneglicals-cant-teach-us-anything I think he pokes ..."

Scurra

The purpose-driven labor priest

"The Elon/White House story is clearly more complicated than that, because both of them seem ..."

Scurra

The purpose-driven labor priest

"Another Linus has his own opinion on that: https://uploads.disquscdn.c..."

reynard61

The purpose-driven labor priest

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which Gospel was written by a doctor?

Select your answer to see how you score.

John Matthew Mark Luke