Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
The boastful pride of pro-life: Anatomy of a lie

The boastful pride of pro-life: Anatomy of a lie

Last updated on: September 18, 2024 at 5:34 pm by Fred Clark

0 Comments

The boastful pride of pro-life: Anatomy of a lie 2024-09-18T17:34:28-04:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The lie is primarily used for self-deception. It is not intended or employed to deceive or to persuade others, but to reassure oneself.*

And this desire for self-deception is at least partly sympathetic, as it has to do with something like theodicy — an attempt to make sense of senseless suffering and to explain the inexplicable.

I’ve often made fun of the biblical characters Eliphaz, Bildad, and Zophar — the three friends of Job who beclown themselves by desperately seeking some rational explanation for his suffering. They are fair game — the whole point of the story is that their foolishness is foolish. The narrator of the story tells us they’re wrong from the get-go, and by the end of the story God is showing up Godself, in person, to confirm that they have no idea what they’re babbling about.

But we should also have some pity for this poor trio (or quartet, once Elihu joins the party to offer his also Very Wrong ideas about what Job must have done wrong to deserve his fate). They’re scared. Senseless, awful suffering is scary. Their friend Job is the best person they have ever known and he suddenly loses everything — his children, his possessions, his home, his health. If that could happen to the best person they know, then it could just as easily happen to them, at any moment.

That’s horrifying to contemplate.

Here is a pre-Dobbs news story about one family’s heart-breaking reliance on the reproductive care now denied in “pro-life” jurisdictions, “One takes from this that pregnancies can go very, very wrong, very quickly,” the doctor says in this story.

That’s scary. That’s scary in a way that tempts us to latch onto any alternative to the reality in which it is true — or to any fantasy explanation that will, at least, allow us an excuse not to think about it.

Back in Job, Bildad et. al. respond to their terror at the possibility of senseless suffering by latching onto the sense-making insistence that Job must have sinned somehow. This is an utterly human response. Thousands of years after this story was first told, it is a thing we humans still do. Confronted with the terrifying, unsettling possibility of senseless suffering and anguish, we seek comfort by accusing those who are suffering of some sin. Surely this Bad Thing would not have happened to them if they had not themselves done Bad Things. Surely suffering would not visit itself upon innocent people. Surely it must be punishment for their sins.

That’s a huge part of this lie. And that part of it isn’t so much a lie at all as a fantasy — a desperate desire to believe a comforting thing in the face of otherwise confounding, upsetting, inexplicable suffering.

This is what makes debunking and refuting this lie so difficult. It is, in large measure, a comforting self-delusion resorted to by people who cannot otherwise bear the reality of unimaginable, arbitrary, meaningless suffering. It is hard to displace that fantasy without replacing it with some equally comforting explanation, but no such comforting explanation exists for us to offer. Like the author of Job, or like the God who appears in that story, we do not have any tidy explanation to make sense of it all, making the unbearable bearable for those confronted with — and terrified by — the prospect of senseless suffering.

But given all of that, we still need to refute and debunk this lie because it is not only about that. It is also, explicitly, a vicious slur directed at millions of people. It is a particularly nasty and egregious example of bearing false witness against our neighbors. And so we are obliged to protect and defend those neighbors — and to protect and defend the truth — by testifying truthfully, denouncing the lie, and correcting it with the truth.

This brings us to the other motive driving this lie. If it is partly a tool of self-deception providing a facade of reassuring theodicy it is also partly a tool of self-deception providing a pretense of personal virtue. It’s about identity and self-concept — something that involves even higher stakes for those invested in embracing this lie. They cling to it because it reassures them that they are good people. Or, at least, it reassures them that they are relatively good people — better than those other people, those sinister sinners and sluts.

These two motives for self-deception are intertwined. This desire to regard oneself as virtuous, or as better-than, is never exclusively a product of self-righteous and the boastful pride of life. It’s tangled up with that Bildad-ish terror at the inexplicable injustice of a world where suffering and loss often seem senseless, arbitrary, and capricious. The desperation for some reassurance that we are safe (or relatively safer) from such suffering can always tempt us, like Bildad, to assert that those suffering pain and loss must be wicked sinners who deserve it.

All of that fear and fearful need for reassurance leads to these folks eagerly, urgently bearing false witness against their neighbors just the way that Bildad bore false witness against his friend. This is why this pernicious lie is so resistant to simple “fact-checking.” Correcting its false, inaccurate claims with truthful, accurate claims is no more effective than when the narrator of Job steps in to remind Bildad, et. al., that Job was “blameless and upright; he feared God and shunned evil.”

But on the other hand, the high-stakes emotional need for the reassurance this lie provides does not alter the simple fact that the lie itself is completely bonkers.

It makes no sense. There is no credible, plausible story that can be constructed around it that can turn this lie into a believable claim about how any believably human humans might behave.

The lie is, on the most basic level, dumb. Really, really dumb.

Unbelievably dumb and incredibly dumb in the literal sense of both “unbelievable” and “in-credible.”

So while it is understandable, for all the reasons discussed above, that people might want to believe this lie, it is absolutely not possible than anyone actually does believe it. Not in its most blatant, Trumpian form — “they’re executing babies.” And not in its more polite, elliptical forms. ( “I was disappointed that Harris was not clear about opposing abortion in the seventh, eighth, and ninth months” is one such polite form seen recently.)

Pointing this out to them is sometimes constructive, Asking “What is it you imagine is happening here? And how and why would such a thing ever happen? Tell me the version of this story that you imagine is happening, at scale, and explain what might motivate the characters in this version of the story to act in this way.”

Don’t put them on the spot by forcing them to supply an answer right then and there. That will just get you sidetracked into a discussion of urban legends about prom babies and the shameful embarrassment they’ll feel from stammering such nonsense sometimes causes them to double-down defensively.

Before Dobbs, these half-baked, half-assed, half-imagined fantasies about the implicitly fiendish motivations for late-term abortions or for non-existent “post-birth” abortions were somewhat easier to trick oneself into believing. But now that every week brings new reports of the agonizing stories of the real people, the real and really wanted pregnancies, and the real human suffering and tragedy that’s really happening, that pretense is harder to maintain. It becomes harder and harder not to look “exactly where you don’t want to look, where you never want to look” — at the truth.

And it becomes harder not to see the ugly, indefensible way that truth has been rejected outright by “godly” people who have no qualms about bearing false witness against their neighbors and doing so in the most vicious, nasty, ridiculous ways possible.

* This is obvious once you think about it for a moment. Bearing false witness against your neighbors is not an effective way of winning over those same neighbors. This is why Tom Hanks will never join Q-Anon.

Uncategorized

Satanic baby-killers

Previous Post

September 16, 2024

Tony Campolo is not a white evangelical

Next Post

September 20, 2024 LBCF: Rule No. 4

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"A MN legislator posted the other day about how spectacularly terrible this is about to ..."

Scurra

Smart people saying smart things (10.20.26)

"https://c.tenor.com/XyHFB5gb_EgAAAAd/tenor.gif"

Brandi

Smart people saying smart things (10.20.26)

"I've seen videos of OSHA inspectors in the Trek universe..."

Andrew

Some obscure footnotes of white evangelical ..."

"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kXJo4PoMQRM"

Matri

Smart people saying smart things (10.20.26)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How many days and nights did it rain during the flood?

Select your answer to see how you score.

10 40 12 7