Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
Pretending to believe in the Imaginary Liberal

Pretending to believe in the Imaginary Liberal

Last updated on: August 15, 2024 at 4:19 pm by Fred Clark

0 Comments

Pretending to believe in the Imaginary Liberal 2024-08-15T16:19:44-04:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I snapped a picture of this bumper-sticker in a parking lot down the Shore:

This guy is proud to proclaim that he is “EVERYTHING A LIBERAL HATES.”

That’s a weird thing to be proud of — even without mentioning anything specifically political or partisan.

I am a liberal. Or, at least, I am very much the sort of person that this guy would almost certainly regard as “A LIBERAL.” But if he and I were each asked to spend an hour preparing lists of things we hate, I’m pretty sure there’d be considerable overlap between our lists. Like, just quickly, here are few items that would be on mine:

The KARS-for-KIDS jingle.
Starting extra innings with a Manfred runner on second base.
School shootings.
When they put so many of those plastic T-tags into a pack of socks that you wind up stepping on a piece of sharp, invisible plastic the first time you wear your new socks.
Line-jumping.
Ruining brussels sprouts by boiling them into mush instead of roasting them with olive oil.
Hidden fees.
Pop-up ads
When a bad call by an umpire or ref changes the outcome of a game.
Spam.
Robo-calls from telemarketers.
Bullying.
That gross gummy residue left on a paperback book after you peel off the bookstore’s sticker.
Cancer.

Even if our emphatically NOT A LIBERAL friend hadn’t thought to list any of those himself, I’d bet he’d agree with me on many of them. Just because I, a liberal, hate these things does not mean that I imagine conservatives are sitting around, singing “1-877-Kars for Kids …” with their mouths full of mushy, flavorless brussels sprouts as they cheerfully read through every e-mail in their spam folder.

And I’m pretty sure — or, at least, I am hopeful — that our friend was not trying to tell us that he is “PROUD TO BE CANCER” or “PROUD TO BE TELEMARKETING SPAM.”

Yes, that’s what he’s saying. He is literally saying that he’s “PROUD TO BE EVERYTHING” a liberal hates and no matter how you construct this median or archetypal representative “LIBERAL,” that person is going to be a person who hates most of the things that most people rightfully hate. So this guy is literally out here proclaiming that he’s proud to “BE” (identify as? endorse? embody?) a host of hateful things hated by most people — liberal or conservative — because those things are hateful.

But I’m pretty sure our friend wasn’t thinking about anything like that when he slapped this bumper sticker on his Jeep. That’s what he’s saying, but I don’t think it’s what he means.

He wasn’t thinking about anything that real people really hate because he was too busy trying as hard as he could to avoid thinking about real people at all.

You can’t let yourself think about real people if you’re trying to flatter yourself by contrasting your own relative virtue with that of monstrous, inhuman, imaginary liberals. If you’re trying to believe in imaginary liberals, you can’t allow yourself to think about real people at all, not even a little bit.

And that is what this bumper sticker is about: Imaginary Liberals.

Imaginary Liberals are very important to the kind of white-resentment/Fox News/MAGA “conservative” identity of 21st-century America. Imaginary Liberals provide these conservatives with an identity and a purpose and a soteriology. This makes belief in Imaginary Liberals more like a religion than a form of politics.

Who am I? I am the opposite of an Imaginary Liberal.

Why am I here? To oppose Imaginary Liberals.

Am I a good person? Can I be proud of myself and my life and my choices? Yes, of course you can, because look at how much better you are than all of those awful, horrible, no-good Imaginary Liberals.

The main flaw in this religion is that, alas, Imaginary Liberals are imaginary.

They don’t really exist. The cartoon of an America-hating, Mom-and-apple-pie-despising, Satanic baby-killing Imaginary Liberal is not sustainable for anyone who encounters real human people in the course of real human living. The construct of the Imaginary Liberal and all the assumptions it requires about Those People crumbles whenever you actually meet any of Those People.

Some people are liberals — quite a lot of people, actually. But almost no one, anywhere, is anything like the Imaginary Liberals of this bumper sticker.

That sticker and its desperate attempt to pretend to believe in Imaginary Liberals reminded me of the first time I really started thinking about this, thanks to an extravagantly weird scene in the Rapture-fantasy novel Left Behind. In this scene, the soon-to-be-Antichrist announces that he plans to instate One World Government with One World Religion and One World Language.

In the novel, this plan — impossibly — is met with universal, unanimous joy and celebration. No one stops to ask which language they will be required to learn after they’re prohibited from speaking their own. No one stops to say that they already have a religion that they’re rather attached to, thank you very much. No one hesitates, even for a moment, to insist that they like the country they already have and don’t want it to be abolished. Apart from the small band of Real, True Christians in the novel, every human on earth is overjoyed to be relieved of their language, culture, religion, and nationality.

It’s a dazzingly bizarre scene. It requires every person on earth to behave like no person has ever behaved — like no person would ever behave. But that’s what happens in Left Behind because it is telling a story that has no people as characters in it. Instead of people, it has Imaginary Liberals:

Imaginary Liberals are awful people. They hate America and they hate God.

Even the ones who claim to believe in some other religion hate the Real True Christian God specifically, they’ve just pretended to latch onto that other religion, which they know isn’t real, as a convenient vehicle for expressing that hatred. Thus the abolition of all religion, seeing it subsumed it into one ill-defined, featureless global porridge is exactly what they’re hoping for. …

The ones who claim to love some other country really just hate America, specifically, and they’ve just pretended to latch onto that other nationalism, which they know isn’t real, as a convenient vehicle for expressing that hatred too. Thus the abolition of all nations — including the delicious elimination of America itself — is also exactly what they’re hoping for.

Awful, awful people those Imaginary Liberals.

And the authors think you’re one of them. Those ridiculous reporters swooning and gushing over [the Antichrist’s] moist and thick tyranny are the authors’ stand-ins for you and me. This is how they imagine we would respond if we heard just such an announcement. This is what they imagine we want to see happen. The authors don’t realize that the Imaginary Liberal is imaginary. They think they’re real and they’re everywhere.

… Believing in the Imaginary Liberal, like believing in anything else that is demonstrably unreal, requires a great deal of effort. That effort, again, can never be wholly unconscious. Some part of the self must always be vigilantly attempting to explain why the abundant evidence against that belief doesn’t matter while also attempting to explain why the utter lack of evidence for that belief doesn’t matter. Thus, again, the lie must constantly be reinforced or reconstructed. And thus, again, this active effort to persuade oneself inevitably persists as a nagging reminder that oneself still needs persuading.

Which brings us back to the tortured grammar of trying to convey this multi-layered self-deception: The Imaginary Liberal is something in which the authors have “chosen to pretend to believe.” That’s not quite the same thing as actually believing, mind you, but it’s close enough for them to not-quite-comfortably convince themselves that this passage provides an accurate portrayal of [the Antichrist’s] rise to power and the enthusiastic reception they have chosen to pretend to believe it would receive.

Uncategorized

Satanic baby-killers

Previous Post

August 13, 2024

Trumpets towers and tenements, wide oceans full of tears

Next Post

August 16, 2024 LBCF: 10 pages in the men's room

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"https://c.tenor.com/XyHFB5gb_EgAAAAd/tenor.gif"

Brandi

Cycling down the widening gyre

"The “Born in the USA” syndrome strikes again. Neil Young is suing Trump over his ..."

Carstonio

Cycling down the widening gyre

"More analysis went into this determination than just this picture, but it's not that surprising, ..."

Jim Roberts

Cycling down the widening gyre

"Assuming he actually did that...."

P J Evans

Cycling down the widening gyre

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: 2 Peter warns that false teachers will secretly introduce destructive heresies.

Select your answer to see how you score.

FALSE TRUE