Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
Good news is good

Good news is good

Last updated on: August 8, 2024 at 5:54 pm by Fred Clark

0 Comments

Good news is good 2024-08-08T17:54:15-04:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Complaints about “media bias” resonate as something meaningful, but not for the reason most people seem to think.

It’s not about partisanship — about a bias in favor of one political party or the other. It’s about Good News and Bad News. When news outlets treat Good News or Bad News as “neutral,” that doesn’t come across as a lack of bias, it comes across as inaccurate and untruthful. It doesn’t seem “disinterested” in the sense of dispassionately uncorrupted, but rather as disinterested in the sense of apathetic and unconcerned about the real-world impact of the story on real people.

When you report Good News without acknowledging that it is, in fact, Good News you come across as biased against goodness. That just sounds — to use a recently revitalized word — weird.

News outlets usually get this right when they’re covering something like a natural disaster. “Tornado Destroys Orphanage” will be reported — accurately and correctly — as Bad News. The subhed to that article — “All Children Escape Unharmed” — will be reported as Good News in the context of that Bad News. The piece will, rightly and accurately, celebrate the children’s survival and mourn their loss of a home.

But as soon as there’s any hint of “politics” involved, the reports will take on an uncanny, inhuman aspect that ceases to rejoice with those who rejoice and mourn with those who mourn. The next day’s story — “Governor Denies Aid to Rebuild Orphanage” — will weirdly be treated as a neutral story when it absolutely is not. It’s a Bad News story. Just as the next week’s follow-up — “Bowing to Pressure, Governor Pledges to Rebuild Orphanage” — is a Good News story that will come across as grossly distorted and inaccurate if it is reported neutrally and fails to understand that this is cause for celebration.

The initial, accurate reports about the tornado and the children’s escape will include the voices of those children. They consider their survival to be what it is: Good News. And in this “non-political” story, that perspective will be permitted. But the children’s voices will not be included in the following “political” stories because that might be perceived as taking sides against the governor who is taking sides against them. You can’t have orphans commenting in a story about orphanages because they’re obviously “biased.”

I’ve written about this before, many times. Here’s one of those from a few years back: “Media Bias Should Be Good News.”

That 2017 post includes a different hypothetical that is no longer a hypothetical:

So let’s turn back to the local pages and look at another story. This one involves hungry poor children getting a nutritious hot meal.

That’s Good News, right? I mean, objectively speaking, hungry children getting fed is a Good Thing. If someone fails to recognize that then there isn’t even any point in arguing about the categories of Good Thing and Bad Thing with them. Like the understanding that a family losing their home in a fire is Bad News, the fact that hungry children being fed is Good News shouldn’t require any explanation or defense.

Yet the story of local hungry children being fed is not usually reported as a Good News story. Sometimes it is — if the meal in question is being provided by some innocuous, non-controversial local charity on Christmas Day, then it’s fine. Everyone agrees that’s a Good News story and it gets reported with the warm glow of glad tidings of great joy.

But that’s not what happens when the children are being fed by, say, a government-funded school lunch program. Then it becomes a “political” story, and thus something we have to pretend is neither Good News nor Bad News, but a matter of zero-sum controversy. “Politics,” you see, are more like sports — there’s a winning team and a losing team. And those teams become the focus of the story — not the hungry kids.

What that means, ultimately, is that a great deal of Good News is never allowed to be reported as Good News. And Bad News — even calamitously Bad News — doesn’t get reported as Bad News. These stories are, instead, reported as “political” news, meaning — in an effort to avoid partisan bias, or to avoid potential accusations of partisan bias — we pretend that their outcomes are neither good nor bad.

And that means we get those stories wrong.

Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz signed a law guaranteeing lunch for every school child in the state. He’s now being attacked for that, not just by his political opponents, but by “political reporters” who treat that Good News as something that Walz needs to defend or perhaps even apologize for.

“You’ve legalized recreational marijuana, you passed universal background checks on guns, you expanded LGBTQ protections, you implemented tuition-free college for low-income Minnesotans. There’s free breakfast and lunch for school kids,” Jake Tapper said to him in a recent CNN interview.

Walz didn’t skip a beat. “What a monster,” he said. “Kids are having full bellies so they can learn.”

Tapper didn’t explicitly say that “free breakfast and lunch for school kids” was Bad News, but the political reporter pretense would not allow him to acknowledge that it was Good News. After reciting that litany of objectively and obviously Good News, Tapper asked “Do you think [that] record is an asset to the ticket, or would it risk fueling Trump’s attacks as you being a big government liberal?”

Go your way, and tell Jake what things ye have seen and heard, the hungry are fed. This is Good News.

This same inability to recognize and to name Good News as such is reflected in the creepy Republican attacks on Walz as “Tampon Tim.”

The governor, who was a high school teacher for more than 20 years, also signed a law requiring school districts to ensure that all students have free access to tampons and pads if they need them. That’s Good News, and there’s no way to accurately report on it without acknowledging that — without celebrating this as a victory for Minnesota children and schools and families.

Pre-MAGA, Republicans might have attacked this Good News as “fiscally reckless,” claiming that the cost of menstrual supplies would bankrupt school districts or force them to raise taxes. (The reality — competent government able to incorporate this new expense as an investment in students that reaps benefits far beyond its modest cost — wouldn’t have occurred to “small-government” ideologues as a possibility because when you hate government you hate governing and are bad at it and can’t handle new expenses without going bankrupt or having to raise taxes on workers. This law was paid for out of the state’s budget surplus, which also funded tax rebates*.*)

But MAGA Republicans have a different set of obsessions. They’re not attacking “Tampon Tim” because free menstrual supplies are “socialism.” They’re attacking Walz because he’s “putting tampons in men’s bathrooms in public schools” and “there is no greater threat to a woman’s health” than that.

This is, again, just weird. The law simply says that school districts must have a plan to ensure that any student who needs these supplies has access to them for free. It does not mandate providing tampons in boys bathrooms. But because the law does not explicitly prohibit or criminalize the possibility that tampons might also be available anywhere other than the girls bathrooms, they’re attacking this as a state-sponsored effort to turn all teenagers trans. Does this make sense? No. Well, not to anyone who isn’t a sick creep who is deeply, feverishly obsessed with what’s inside the underwear of teenagers. (MAGA: Make All Genitals Accessible.)

Here are two reports on this. The first is from CBS News’ Aimee Picci, “Gov. Tim Walz made tampons free in Minnesota schools. Here’s why it’s drawing Trump’s ire.” The second is from NPR’s Rachel Treisman, “Why Republicans are calling Walz ‘Tampon Tim’ — and why Democrats embrace it.”

Your homework is to read both articles with an eye toward what is reported as Good News, what is reported as Bad News, and what is treated as “political” and therefore outside the realm of Good or Bad. For extra credit, consider who gets interviewed and quoted in these articles — who is invited or permitted to speak about this, and how the selection of those voices is shaped by the determination not to report this as Good News.

class warfare

journalism

Previous Post

August 7, 2024

Praying with Clippy

Next Post

August 9, 2024 LBCF: Ars Poetica

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"Also: https://uploads.disquscdn.c..."

Ross

LBCF: Body and Soul

"Someone just released a fanfilm attempting to tie the two together as a "found footage" ..."

Ross

LBCF: Body and Soul

"Right, it appears he believes that artificial intelligence will restore the natural order where men ..."

Ross

LBCF: Body and Soul

"Money. The first Halloween made a boatload of it, and it was a/the major player ..."

Vucodlak

LBCF: Body and Soul

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What Christian group believes in a "Memorial" instead of a traditional communion?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Jehovah’s Witnesses Anglicans Catholics Lutherans