Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
Bootlicking Calvinism is the unfunny kind of Calvin + Hobbes

Bootlicking Calvinism is the unfunny kind of Calvin + Hobbes

Last updated on: April 8, 2024 at 9:49 pm by Fred Clark

0 Comments

Bootlicking Calvinism is the unfunny kind of Calvin + Hobbes 2024-04-08T21:49:53-04:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Calvinism teaches a dim view of human nature. We humans, Calvin believed, are fallen, fallible, sin-prone creatures incapable of justice without the aid of divine grace. We could roughly summarize the Calvinist view of human nature as “APAB” — all people are bastards.

That is, of course, a variation of a more common popular slogan, “ACAB,” meaning all cops are bastards.

The funny Calvin & Hobbes is good. Bill Watterson’s comic strip is hilarious and beautiful, profitable for doctrine and for instruction in righteousness.

You might expect, then, that good Calvinists would agree with that latter sentiment. They might not appreciate the punks and anarchists who spray paint “ACAB” on subway walls but, logically, it is a statement that they must regard as true. If all people are sinful bastards, and police are a subset within “all people,” then all police, as people, must also be sinful bastards. If all people cannot be trusted to do justice, love mercy, and walk humbly with their God, then it would be foolish to claim that police officers are somehow, inexplicably, an exception to this universal rule.

And yet this is exactly what many purported Calvinists believe and advocate. “There is none righteous, no not one,” they intone, “except for cops.”

They don’t say “cops,” exactly. What they usually say, instead, is “magistrates.” That was the catch-all term used centuries ago for those hierarchical authorities deemed exempt from everything that Calvinism otherwise insisted was true for every other group of humans. If you hear the word “magistrates” nowadays, and you’re not in traffic court, then you’re probably encountering some form of bootlicking Calvinism, the contradictory idea that APAB, but not ACAB.

This contradiction arises from thinking that if human nature is the problem, then hierarchy must be the solution. It’s not quite the absolute hierarchy of Thomas Hobbes’ absolute sovereign “Leviathan,” but it creates and venerates lots of little sovereigns reigning in lots of little hierarchies. The divine right of kings is limited only by a host of other, lesser divine rights — the divine right of pastors, of husbands, of fathers, of CEOs, of “magistrates” and “lesser magistrates.”

And the divine right of cops.

These divinely ordained hierarchies are accountable only to God, not to those “beneath” them, over whom God has appointed them to reign.

The problem here is not with the initial Reformed understanding of human nature, but with the betrayal of that understanding entailed in the enshrinement of all of these hierarchies baselessly asserted to be exempt from everything Reformed theology otherwise insists is true about humans and our capacity for injustice and sin.

Bootlicking Calvinism is the foolishness that produces things like this: “Police Oversight in Florida Is Already Weak. The State Is About to Gut It Further.” That Bolts article is about a bill passed by Florida’s Republican legislature that would bar civilian oversight boards from investigating suspected police misconduct.

On BlueSky, Seth D. Michaels responded to that with a fine bit of Niebuhrian theology:

“If the state issues you a badge and a gun and gives you the authority to make decisions about the use of force, that should mean you have a *higher* level of accountability to others and should expect *more* scrutiny of your actions.”

Reinhold Niebuhr completely agreed with the Calvinist/Augustinian view of human nature. We are, he believed, finite, fallible creatures prone to sin and to selfishness and to self-deception. And because he believed that was true, he was also convinced that none of us can or should be trusted with unaccountable power. The more authority any given human has, the more accountable that person must be, lest they wield that authority unjustly, as we humans inevitably tend to do.

This is similar to what Ben Parker told his nephew, that with great power comes great responsibility.

Another way of putting that is just to say that with great responsibility comes great responsibility.

As Michaels says, a badge and a gun carry both great authority and great responsibility. A fallen, finite, fallible human being is being granted the authority to make life and death decisions about the lives of others. That’s huge. It is not to be taken lightly. Granting such an increase in authority without ensuring an accompanying increase in accountability and scrutiny and responsibility is not just imprudent, but disrespectful toward the authority itself and toward those who wield it. It ignores — and therefore belittles and demeans — the gravity of that office.

That’s true even if it’s done with a high-falutin’ gloss of archaic theologizing about “magistrates” and divinely sanctioned hierarchies that must never be questioned by civilians or by “we the people” or by wives or by Robert Peel.

I am not a Calvinist but, as I’ve said before, it’s not that I disagree with Calvinism’s pessimistic view of human nature, but that I disagree with its pessimistic view of God. Like Reinhold Niebuhr, I think the Calvinist/Augustinian view of human nature is both generally correct and urgently necessary with regard to any human entrusted with any amount of power over the lives and freedoms and dignity of others.

Set aside the ethereal abstractions about whether or not most people are mostly good or mostly good enough. The question here is whether or not most people — or even any people — can or should be trusted to wield unchecked power over others.

The only safe answer is No.

Hierarchies do not exempt some humans from human nature, they intensify that human nature and its consequences. The more hierarchies we create or allow or enforce, the more “sinful” the world will be. Bring down the rulers from their thrones and lift up the humble. And if any human needs to be entrusted with greater authority or greater power, make sure that human is subject to greater scrutiny and greater accountability.

Remember that AMAB — all magistrates are bastards. Because if you don’t vigilantly remember that, they’ll wind up reminding you of that themselves.

class warfare

CopsBehavingBadly

Previous Post

April 5, 2024

The highway to hell needs chauffeurs for the powers that be

Next Post

April 10, 2024 Smart people saying smart things (04.10.24)

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"Push your luck games like craps work better on me but, yeah, roulette is classic ..."

Jim Roberts

Smart people saying smart things (10.20.26)

"The anti-trans rhetoric certainly sounds like recycled Jim Crow racist paranoia, down to the sports ..."

Carstonio

Smart people saying smart things (10.20.26)

"Cheetahs might be the next largest cats that purr."

P J Evans

Smart people saying smart things (10.20.26)

"I want to a "casino party" where we got tickets to "bet" with. I found ..."

P J Evans

Smart people saying smart things (10.20.26)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What event marked the start of the early church?

Select your answer to see how you score.

The Ascension Pentecost Jesus’ Baptism The Crucifixion