Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
It’s not deception. It’s permission.

It’s not deception. It’s permission.

Last updated on: March 20, 2024 at 3:29 am by Fred Clark

0 Comments

It’s not deception. It’s permission. 2024-03-20T03:29:52-04:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Peter Pomerantsev has a new book out about Sefton Delmer. Who and who?

Let’s start with the second one. Sefton Delmer was the head of Britain’s Political Warfare Executive, “He ran propaganda operations for the British against the Hitler regime.”

That’s from Terry Gross’ summary of Pomerantsev’s book on Delmer from her interview with him last week on National Public Radio’s “Fresh Air.” The stories and examples of Delmer’s efforts to undermine Nazi Germany are fascinating, but to me the most interesting part of the conversation is where Pomerantsev describes Delmer’s philosophy of propaganda:

… That propaganda or communication is not about persuasion. It’s about allowing people to do what they wanted to do in the first place. … It’s not about changing people’s minds. It’s about finding the thing that they really want to do … and give them an excuse to do it.

Effective propaganda, in other words, is not disinformation or misinformation. It does not deceive. It simply gives permission.

Pomerantsev expands on this later in the interview, when the topic shifts from Sefton Delmer’s efforts during World War II to Vladimir Putin’s propaganda today during his unprovoked invasion of Ukraine:

GROSS: How effective do you think the propaganda that Ukrainians are Nazis and that Zelenskyy is a Nazi, how effective do you think that’s been in Russia?

POMERANTSEV: Well, going back to Sefton Delmer, and here I really agree with him, Delmer would say that, you know, propaganda just makes naked. It makes possible what was there already. And what is this propaganda doing? It’s allowing Russians to say — who don’t want to feel any responsibility — well, look. They’re all Nazis. I mean, we’re not responsible for this war. I mean, they — it’s all their fault. People, you know, a lot of people don’t want to think that, you know, they’re the bad ones. So it gives you an excuse to avoid responsibility. A lot of propaganda is about avoiding your sense of personal responsibility.

Secondly, it can enable sadism for those who desire that sadism. I mean, once you’ve called them Nazis, it’s a bit like calling, you know, well, it’s a bit like saying that they’re not — dehumanizing them, actually. So you’re using the language of calling somebody a Nazi to do what the Nazis did, which is dehumanize others. And once you’ve said that, for those who are sadistically inclined, and that might be more people than we are comfortable in admitting, you can go and do horrible, horrible things to them.

This is precisely the same dynamic as what I describe here as “Satanic baby-killerism.” The aim is not to deceive others into accepting the preposterous notion that millions of their neighbors are baby-killers and death incarnate or to deceive them into thinking that the Jewish man elected president of Ukraine is secretly a Nazi. Those others know this is false, but they want to be able to act the way they could act if it were true. The lie that gives them such permission does not need to be plausible, only flattering enough to be popular.

Permission, not deception. At least, not deception in the way we usually think of it, as a trick that dupes the otherwise unwilling. It’s more like what I’ve previously described as an invitation to participate in deception — a communal self-deception that allows volunteer participants to support one another by acting as a kind of tie-breaker in the stalemate that individual attempts at self-deception produce.

“The self-deceiver does not believe what he says or he would not be a deceiver,” Philip Leon wrote. “He does believe what he says or he would not be deceived. He both believes and does not believe.”

That seems paradoxical, but it’s not really as fancy as all that. How is the self-deceiver both the object and the subject of deception? He’s not. Because the same “self” that “does not believe” because he is fully aware of his attempt to deceive is the self who claims to be deceived and thus claims “he does believe.”

So it’s not actually the case that “The self-deceiver … both believes and does not believe,” but rather that the self-deceiver does not believe, but pretends to.

The primary audience for this pretense of belief is not others, but the self-deceiver himself. It is thus a second round of attempted self-deception. It fails for the same reason the first round failed and, thus, requires a third attempt, and a fourth, etc.

Self-deception is like moving a king-sized mattress. It’s possible to do it all by yourself if you’re very determined to do it. But it’s a lot easier if you get others involved.

The desire for this self-deception, as Pomerantsev says, is “to avoid responsibility.” And thus it is also to avoid the complicity — the guilt — that comes from having refused all responsibility. No one wants to accept that they’re on the wrong side, the side of unfairness and injustice, of cruelty and harm. No one is happy about being forced to ask themselves “Are we the baddies?” Nor are they happy about the undeniable sense that the question has only come up because you’ve begun to suspect the answer. And rather than face having to consider an honest answer to that question, most people will desperately reach for any pretext to change the subject and avoid thinking about it.

The problem with avoiding thinking about something, of course, is that you’re the one doing the avoiding and thus you cannot do it wholly unawares. So, again, it’s easier to do this in groups. As Reinhold Niebuhr put it, “If others will only accept what the self cannot quite accept, the self as deceiver is given an ally against the self as deceived.” (That’s from The Nature and Destiny of Man, which is also where that Philip Leon quote with the similarly patriarchal language is from.)

Uncategorized

Satanic baby-killers

Previous Post

March 18, 2024

Brenda put your bra on, it's just gettin' good

Next Post

March 20, 2024 Can't seem to get it through my head

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"I mean, these days, would Lois necessarily view it as a problem? https://uploads.disquscdn.c..."

Jon Maki

The purpose-driven labor priest

"Like, for instance, how one major theme in Prince Caspian is that Lewis was determined ..."

lowtechcyclist

Daughters of Adam and Sons of ..."

"I like his style overall - though everyone does always look a bit greasy to ..."

Jon Maki

The purpose-driven labor priest

"Hope he enjoyed that last cheque, because he’s on notice now."

Matri

The purpose-driven labor priest

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What was Moses' father's name?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Arron Amram Apollos Abiathar