Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
We don’t live in ‘bubbles’

We don’t live in ‘bubbles’

Last updated on: January 25, 2024 at 5:28 pm by Fred Clark

0 Comments

We don’t live in ‘bubbles’ 2024-01-25T17:28:14-05:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Trump’s magnet thing was even worse than it initially sounded.

It wasn’t just that Donald Trump thinks that magnets won’t work if they get wet. I mean, that’s part of it. And that is staggeringly ignorant and weird. And, on one level, very funny.

Donald Trump did actually say this: “All I know about magnets is this, give me a glass of water, let me drop it on the magnets, that’s the end of the magnets.”

The misplaced confidence there — the mixture of arrogance and ignorance — is like a Will Ferrell bit. Trump is bragging about thinking that magnets would be ruined by “a glass of water.” As a comedian, Ferrell understands that a buffoon is amusing, but a preening buffoon is hilarious. This is why Trump himself became famous, for decades, as New York City’s premier real-life example of a preening buffoon and thus a walking punchline whose penchant for putting his name on buildings just added to the joke.

But there’s a difference between Ron Burgundy as a local news anchor — or even as a local landlord and failed casino magnate — and Ron Burgundy as president. It’s not funny when the consequences of the preening buffoon’s arrogant, petty, vindictive ignorance are potentially national and global in scope.

That was the scary part of Trump’s boast about his unique misunderstanding of magnets.

He was rambling about the Pentagon and somehow about the new magnetic weapons elevators on some American warships and he explained his theory of water-soluble magnetism as evidence that he was smarter than any of the people at the Pentagon or in Congress and, therefore, he doesn’t need to listen to any advice or suggestions from anybody else.

In other words, it’s not just that Donald Trump is dangerously ignorant and that he would not be able to pass a fourth grade science test. It’s that Donald Trump is proud of his ignorance, incapable of learning, and utterly impervious to advice, instruction, or correction.

That’s hugely consequential and massively important. It’s also, I suppose, something that might be regarded as “old news” and therefore as not newsworthy, since this is something that most Americans came to know about Donald Trump many years ago.

That’s part of why the press treated this as a small, one-day story about Donald Trump when it would have been treated as a massive, weeks-long, career-ending, legacy-defining, first-line-of-the-obituary story about any other politician. If Joe Biden had bragged about thinking a glass of water would ruin magnets three weeks ago it would have been a huge story that would still be making banner headlines today. Every politician — Democratic or Republican — would have been asked to comment on what it means that the commander in chief is so ignorant and out-of-touch with reality.

And that’s how the story would have been treated if the same bizarre foolishness had been uttered by Ron DeSantis, or Nikki Haley.

Heck, if Chester A. Arthur had even said something so completely stupid in such an arrogant tone, then that’s all he’d be remembered for today. Historians would refer to President Arthur as “the magnets guy” instead of just as, um, one of those guys who came between Grant and Teddy and probably won’t be on the final.

But journalists seem to be assuming that Trump is different because none of this matters to his supporters. They have calculated that Trump’s latest batshit nonsense won’t make any more difference to those supporters than the hundreds of equally ludicrous and nonsensical statements the perpetually addled former president has made previously. So if Trump’s supporters don’t care that he brags about not knowing anything about magnets, and if this latest nonsense won’t alter the opinions of the rest of the country because they already understand Trump’s adversarial relationship with reality, then why bother reporting on it?

I don’t think this assumption is wholly true. I think there are, in fact, some Trump supporters who would stumble if confronted by the reality of Trump’s unreality.

Yes, sure, Trump’s lock-step base is a cult of personality and, for them, whatever he says is the new reality. If you asked any of them on the day before whether or not “a glass of water” would cause magnets to stop working, nearly all of them would tell you that of course not … that’s stupid … don’t be foolish. But the next day, after their leader said “All I know about magnets is this, give me a glass of water, let me drop it on the magnets, that’s the end of the magnets” those very same personality-cult devotees would pivot on a dime and tell you that this is what they, too, believe about magnets and water. And they will begin to pretend to believe that with all their might.

But the difference between pretending to believe in unreality and actually believing it is bigger than most people realize. Pretending to believe in something impossible to believe is hard. Almost no one is able to pull it off with complete success. So the magnet thing would be newsworthy even for the most hard-core die-hard members of Trump’s personality cult. It would help to make their voluntary commitment to unreality a bit more difficult to maintain.

And it would be even more newsworthy for Trump supporters closer to the margin — people who voted for him in the past, but who are not fervid members of the personality cult. Bizarre, disqualifying nonsense like his rant about magnets would likely have an effect on that slice of the electorate.

That’s clearly the assumption that Fox News and OAN and Salem Radio and similar far-right, far-white “news” media have made about things like Trump’s magnets rant. That’s why they ignore, bury, or try to distract away from stories like that. They wouldn’t be doing all of that hard work if they didn’t think such incidents would have an impact on their audience.

Please note that Trump’s magnets foolishness wasn’t a Tweet or something that happened only in the virtual “bubble” of Very Online world. This was a televised, public campaign speech in Iowa just before the Iowa caucuses. It happened out there, in public, in the real world, with cameras rolling from every major network and reporters from every big paper right there in the room.

That’s what makes the calculus that it wasn’t “news” so dangerously cynical. That calculus is based on the assumption that we don’t all live in the same reality — that we occupy different epistemological “bubbles.” People who watch Fox live in one reality bubble and people who watch MSNBC live in another and people who watch CNN live in yet another. The larger reality bubble, of course, is the one occupied by most people who instead watch, I dunno, NCIS and SVU and multi-season binge-watches of Friends.

But all of those people live in the same reality. Their viewing habits — their choices of what they will or will not allow themselves to see — may affect the nature of their commitment to reality, but they cannot change reality itself. Reality, as Philip K. Dick put it, “is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn’t go away.”

When a Fox News devotee puts a magnet in a glass of water, the same thing happens as when an MSNBC fan puts a magnet in a glass of water. The effect of water on magnetism was not previously a matter of partisan dispute, but even if magnetism becomes as polarized (pun intended) as the heat-trapping property of CO2 nothing about what happens with that magnet and that glass of water will change, for anyone, regardless of what media or subcultural “bubble” they attempt to subscribe to.

I always think of that Philip K. Dick quote in tandem with one from a very different writer, Oswald Chambers: “God holds us responsible for what we will not look at.” That’s a useful reminder that all this talk of “epistemological bubbles” or “media bubbles” or “political bubbles” glosses over the perpetual choosing of what we will and will not look at.

I’m not talking about choosing a news channel. I’m talking about the perpetual vigilance that not looking requires. This involves effort, choice, and an active, knowing involvement in the pretense. It can, from long practice, become habitual and thus somewhat instinctive and reflexive, but it can never be wholly subconscious.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

January 22, 2024

Just waitin' for more sinners to show up

Next Post

January 29, 2024 Leaving Nash Vegas

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"When I went to heaven, Jesus was in a tuxedo T-shirt. I thought that was ..."

Old Man Shadow

Always wear a helmet when skateboarding

"You'd think he'd know where the word assassin comes from and run with that. Maybe ..."

Rick

Always wear a helmet when skateboarding

"That actually sounds like an ad for a libertarian candidate."

Rick

Always wear a helmet when skateboarding

"I've met people who think that they will win the lottery, so they buy tickets ..."

P J Evans

Always wear a helmet when skateboarding

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which tribe of Israel did NOT receive a land inheritance?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Judah Gad Benjamin Levi