Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
History and Religion
Merry Christmas from woke C.S. Lewis

Merry Christmas from woke C.S. Lewis

Last updated on: December 25, 2023 at 11:35 pm by Fred Clark

0 Comments

Merry Christmas from woke C.S. Lewis 2023-12-25T23:35:23-05:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

An old C.S. Lewis quote has been circulating on social media lately as a way of poking at the “anti-woke” White Christianity that has become the loudest, and maybe largest, representative of the faith here in America.

The quote is from Christian Reflections, a compilation of some of Lewis’ articles, lectures, and papers put together after his death by his friend and colleague Walter Hooper. This includes an essay on the Psalms that revisits some of the same territory covered in Lewis’ 1958 Reflections on the Psalms.

Psalms is a fun little book because it’s idiosyncratically personal.* It’s not a pious devotional, but a witty, engaging conversation with Lewis about the things in the Psalms that puzzle, perplex, or perturb him.

And mostly that’s the stuff about vengeance and cursing. “Reflections on the Psalms” could more accurately have been titled “Reflections on What It Means That Our Scriptural Canon Includes Something as Vicious and Nasty and Unsettling as Psalm 109.”

Of these vindictive and vengeful Psalms, Lewis writes:

We must not either try to explain them away or to yield for one moment to the idea that, because it comes in the Bible, all this vindictive hatred must somehow be good and pious. We must face both facts squarely. The hatred is there — festering, gloating, undisguised — and also we should be wicked if we in any way condoned or approved it, or (worse still) used it to justify similar passions in ourselves. Only after these two admissions have been made can we safely proceed.

Squaring up against that hatred, then, he contemplates how such anger is “the natural result of injuring a human being.” It’s what we ought to expect to see when someone is injured, cheated, or crushed beneath a boot. “Take from a man his freedom or his goods and you may have taken his innocence” by tempting him to wrath and resentment.

The natural result of cheating a man, or “keeping him down” or neglecting him, is to arouse resentment; that is, to impose upon him the temptation of becoming what the Psalmists were when they wrote the vindictive passages. He may succeed in resisting the temptation; or he may not. If he fails, if he dies spiritually because of his hatred for me, how do I, who provoked that hatred, stand? For in addition to the original injury I have done him a far worse one. I have introduced into his inner life, at best a new temptation, at worst a new besetting sin. If that sin utterly corrupts him, I have in a sense debauched or seduced him. I was the tempter.

And here, in this “reflection” from 1958, Lewis heads into a hortatory tangent where he muses on what this means for individuals interacting individually with one another: “I … am exceptionally blessed in having been allowed a way of life in which, having little power, I have had little opportunity of oppressing and embittering others. Let all of us who have never been school prefects, N.C.O.s, schoolmasters, matrons of hospitals, prison warders, or even magistrates, give hearty thanks for it.”

The essay on the Psalms in the posthumous Christian Reflections seems like a later expansion on this chapter from his book on the Psalms. This is the source of that quote that’s been circulating on social media. Revisiting this idea of injustice as a kind of double sin that also tempts its victims to wrath, Lewis mentions another example that goes beyond the petty interpersonal oppressions of school prefects and schoolmasters:

We had better look unflinchingly at the sort of work we have done; like puppies, we must have “our noses rubbed in it.” … We ought to read the psalms that curse the oppressor; read them with fear. Who knows what imprecations of the same sort have been uttered against ourselves? What prayers have Red men, and Black, and Brown and Yellow, sent up against us to their gods or sometimes to God Himself? All over the earth the White Man’s offense “smells to heaven”: massacres, broken treaties, theft, kidnappings, enslavement, deportation, floggings, lynchings, beatings-up, rape, insult, mockery, and odious hypocrisy make up that smell.

So there’s your “woke C.S. Lewis” quote.

This is, indeed, exactly the sort of quote that’s bound to give anti-“woke” white Christians the howling fantods. It’s easy to imagine how angrily they would denounce such a statement if it had come from Jemar Tisby or Ibram X. Kendi or Kristin Kobes Du Mez or Howard Zinn or any of the other writ ers these anti-woke white Christians have demonized as the bogeymen of some supposed Woke Menace. And it’s grimly amusing to force them to squirm when confronted with such a statement from a beloved and respected figure like C.S. Lewis.

But I don’t think Lewis really is quite woke here. He is, rather, only half awake, like when one’s sleep is interrupted by a frightening nightmare and one lies, still in bed, still partly in the thrall of that disturbing dream.

The problem here is that Lewis remains preoccupied with “our” spiritual status. The focus is entirely on the standing of the “us” and the “we” that he identifies here as “White Men.” That spiritual standing hinges on whether or not our victims have forgiven us. We must hope that they have or else, Lewis says, we will be found doubly guilty — guilty first of their oppression (the “massacres, broken treaties, theft, kidnappings, enslavement, deportation, floggings, lynchings, beatings-up, rape, insult, mockery,” etc.) and guilty second of having tempted or seduced them into the kind of sinful wrath epitomized by Psalm 109.

Without the forgiveness of these victims, we are doubly guilty and doubly damned, Lewis suggests. And so he argues that we must hope for and wish for and perhaps even beg for that forgiveness.

All of which still leaves us lying in bed, shuddering from the fearful nightmare. It is, quite obviously, not enough. Lewis makes an analogy here between “the White Man’s offense” and “A man, now penitent, who has once seduced and abandoned a girl and then lost sight of her.” Such a man, he says, “had better not avert his eyes from the crude realities of the life she may now be living.”

True, but inadequate. This predatory seducer and victimizer is not merely obliged not to avert his eyes, but to make amends and to offer restitution and support — to do whatever he can to make things right with her. That is what it means for such a man to truly be “penitent.” If his penitence consists merely in “rubbing his nose in it” and then shambling around feeling vaguely guilty and hoping to be forgiven then such a man is still half asleep in bed.

If our actions and our history require forgiveness, then we need to get up, get out of bed, get dressed, and get to work making amends.

Lewis’ admonition to “read the psalms that curse the oppressor; read them with fear” needs to take us beyond where Lewis goes in these reflections. It demands a “penitence” that involves more than an attitude of remorse. “You cannot fast as you do today and expect your voice to be heard,” Isaiah says of such a half-awake half measure.

What it demands, Isaiah says, is:

To loose the chains of injustice
and untie the cords of the yoke,
to set the oppressed free
and break every yoke.
To share your food with the hungry
and to provide the poor wanderer with shelter—
when you see the naked, to clothe them,
and not to turn away from your own flesh and blood.
Then your light will break forth like the dawn,
and your healing will quickly appear;
then your righteousness will go before you,
and the glory of the Lord will be your rear guard.

If “we” require forgiveness lest we seduce those we have oppressed into the sin of wrath, then we need to do whatever we can to earn this unearnable forgiveness.

What does any of that have to do with Christmas? Well, for Lewis that connection comes on the following page. After urging us to “read the psalms that curse the oppressor; read them with fear,” Lewis goes on to say, “It is from this point of view that the Magnificat is terrifying.”

Mary’s song is an essential part of the Christmas story. It is also, Lewis notes, a psalm wholly steeped in the same tradition as the songs we have in Psalms, and one that echoes the themes of those disturbingly vindictive and vengeful passages like Psalm 109. But the Magnificat is almost more fearful because here, “There are no cursings … no hatred, no self-righteousness. Instead, there is mere statement.” The powerful tumble from their thrones and the rich are sent away empty. The poor and hungry and humble are lifted up. That’s just how this story ends for both sides, Mary says, and Lewis correctly recognizes that this is “terrifying” for the particular “we” and “us” that he is addressing.

But we don’t need to be stuck there in that fearful and terrifying state, half awake but still half asleep. We can get up, get out of bed, and yell down from the window “What’s to-day, my fine fellow?”

“Best and happiest of all, the Time before him was his own, to make amends in!”

That is what being really awake looks like. And that, we’ve been told, is what Christmas is all about.

* “It may appear to some that I have used the Psalms merely as pegs on which to hang a series of miscellaneous essays,” Lewis writes in the introduction to that book:

I do not know that it would have done any harm if I had written the book that way, and I shall have no grievance against anyone who reads it that way. But that is not how it was in fact written. The thoughts it contains are those to which I found myself driven in reading the Psalms; sometimes by my enjoyment of them, sometimes by meeting with what at first I could not enjoy.

He also warns the reader, in that introduction: “I dare say I am a much more annoying person than I know.”

History and Religion

Education and Religion

Uncategorized

Previous Post

December 22, 2023

LBCF, No. 6: The Literal Donkey's Penis

Next Post

December 24, 2023 All people means all people (Merry Christmas)

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"Find a way to get the ball out from under all of the furniture it ..."

SmogMonster

The purpose-driven labor priest

"Well, deliberately giving the impression that you are a person licensed to practice law in ..."

SmogMonster

The purpose-driven labor priest

"https://uploads.disquscdn.c..."

Matri

The purpose-driven labor priest

"Lying shouldn’t have been a firing offence. I mean, look at the president! He hasn’t ..."

Matri

The purpose-driven labor priest

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What city did God command Jonah to preach to?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Nineveh Babylon Jericho Tyre