Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

slacktivist

Cakes and ale (and drag queens)

Last updated on: March 24, 2023 at 3:39 pm   by Fred Clark

0 Comments

Cakes and ale (and drag queens) 2023-03-24T15:39:46-04:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

“Dost thou think because thou art virtuous there shall be no more cakes and ale?”

— Twelfth Night, Act II, Scene 3

Four hundred years later people like Malvolio are still around. Like the pompous villain of Shakespeare’s Twelfth Night, these people imagine they possess a superior personal virtue and that this entitles them to abolish from the world everything they regard as vice. One problem with such people is that the long list of things they regard as vice includes many things that are, in fact, good.

Cakes and ale are Good Things. A world without cakes and ale would be a poorer, sadder place and there is nothing virtuous about trying to remake the world into a poorer, sadder place.

Yes, even Good Things can become bad when indulged in excessively or exclusively — as in the example of Sir Toby, the character who speaks the line above. But Toby’s struggle with gluttony doesn’t change the fact that cakes and ale are, in themselves, intrinsically good. They are pleasurable and delightful. Whenever anyone seeks to forbid pleasure and delight, or seeks to abolish intrinsically Good Things in the name of “virtue,” understand that they are, like Malvolio, acting as villains.

There’s nothing at all virtuous about an abstemious moralism that puckers at the thought of anyone, anywhere being happy.

A current wave of vicious pseudo-moralism from our modern Malvolios is what led to my rewatching Twelfth Night recently. I was looking for the 1996 movie version with Imogen Stubbs but instead found this charming, ultra-low-budget 2018 version starring Sheila Atim. Atim plays both Viola and her twin brother, Sebastian — the one great advantage that movie versions of this play have over live productions, since both characters eventually wind up on stage at the same time. (That ’96 version probably should have had Stubbs play both roles as well.)

I enjoyed both movie versions. They’re both very funny and entertaining, even if neither one is as giddily exhilarating as the live version I saw at the Folger in DC. That 2003 production directed by Aaron Posner featured a bunch of terrific actors from Philly’s Arden Theater. The bit where they switched the fencing duels into dance-offs worked so well I kind of think everyone should do the play this way from now on.

The plot of Twelfth Night (or What You Will) is sublimely twisted. Viola survives a shipwreck and finds herself in a foreign land, believing her twin brother was lost at sea. Alone and far from home, she disguises herself as a man in order to find work and shelter as a servant to the local Duke, Orsino, who has been pining with unrequited love for a noble woman named Olivia. This all turns into a gender-bender love triangle as Olivia falls in love with Viola, Viola falls in love with the Duke, and he confuses himself by falling in love with his new servant.

That all had another layer of complication in Shakespeare’s day, when only male actors were permitted on stage. That meant the part of Olivia was played by a man dressed as a woman who was falling in love with a man dressed as a woman dressed as a man. I don’t think that makes contemporary productions less funny, it just means it’s easier for us to keep track of why it is we’re laughing.

Classic Shakespearian “britches roles” like Viola in Twelfth Night and Rosalind in As You Like It require cross-dressing. That’s not at all unusual in theater. Nor is it anything new.

The new and unusual thing is the weird political movement spreading across America in which right-wing governors and state legislatures attempt to make any performance involving cross-dressing illegal. Those new laws are aimed at drag queens — the bizarre new scapegoat du jour for MAGA Malvolios — but all of them wind up also outlawing everything from Twelfth Night to The Nutcracker.

Trying to ban drag is every bit as immoral as trying to ban cakes and ale. “Dost thou think because thou art virtuous there shall be no more drag queens?” That makes you as much of a fool and a villain as Malvolio. Drag is a Good Thing and trying to ban a Good Thing makes you anti-good.

And, to be as clear as possible, being anti-good is bad.

It also makes you a humorless git. Anyone, anywhere, who is railing against drag queens on stage or drag queens reading books to kids is someone without a functioning sense of humor. (They know this to be true, which is one source of the free-floating rage that seems to drive so many would-be “culture-warriors.”)

Which brings us back to Twelfth Night.

My proposal is simply this: Every high school and college theater program in Florida and Tennessee should be putting on this play. So should every community theater in those states and in every other state where grandstanding demagogues are pretending that policing gender conformity is something that elected officials are entitled to do.

Twelfth Night is great art. Audiences love to see and actors love to perform it. Plus it’s royalty free.

Calling on all of these theaters and school theater departments to stage Twelfth Night isn’t asking any of them to do anything they haven’t already been doing for years now. They put on plays and this is a great play.

But couldn’t they get in trouble for staging this play now? Well, sort of. But the point here is that they’re already in trouble, whether they know it or not. They’re already being threatened by the same lawless lawmakers now furiously trying to shut down every drag show and Panto and anything else they can pretend offends their purported virtue.

Consider, for example, Theatre Tallahassee, a community theater just two miles from the Florida State Capitol building where the legislature is considering various “anti-drag” laws. Theatre Tallahassee has been around since 1949 and over those years they’ve staged dozens of plays that would potentially get them shut down by some of the laws now being considered in their state. They’ve done Twelfth Night. They’ve done A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Forum at least three times, and Charley’s Aunt twice. Heck, just a few years ago they put on La Cage Aux Folles.

They didn’t choose any of those plays as a political statement but doing any of them today would become a courageous political statement because the Malvolios of Florida’s Republican state government have politicized everything.

Even freaking Charley’s Aunt.

That 1892 British comedy is what theater people call a “chestnut.” It may not represent the pinnacle of the dramatic arts, but it’s a crowd-pleaser, a low-stakes rom-com farce that’s still funny after 130 years.

The main character in Charley’s Aunt is a perpetual student at Oxford named Lord Fancourt Babberly. His friends call him “Fanny Babs.” Fanny* spends most of the play in a dress, pretending to be “Charley’s Aunt” so that he can serve as a chaperone for his pals Charley and Jack as they woo their respective would-be fiancees. Charley’s real aunt also shows up. Hijinks ensue. It’s great fun.

You can watch the 1941 movie version starring Jack Benny on YouTube for free. It holds up pretty well.

“Jack Benny … in a dress” may not be the most elegant gag ever devised, but it still works. Even if it may no longer be legal in Florida and Tennessee.

It seems strange to suggest that high school theater programs in those states now have something like a moral duty to put on a play like Charley’s Aunt, but these are the times we now live in. And not only do I genuinely think that this is a moral obligation for those schools, but I think it may even require a measure of moral courage for them to do this.

The current right-wing moral panic being stoked by demagogues and groups like the “Malvolio Moms for Liberty” are trying to build a world without cakes and ale. We’re obliged to defend cakes and ale while we still can.

So if you’re a community theater in Florida or Tennessee or Arkansas, or a high school theater program in one of those states, then you need to be planning a production of Twelfth Night or As You Like It or Charley’s Aunt.

And if the petty-tyrants of “Moms for Liberty” threaten to protest, cast their kids in leading roles.


* In Britain, where this play was written and first performed, Charley’s Aunt is regarded as wholesome, harmless, family fun. Is it suitable for children? Of course! Children love slapstick and they love seeing Fanny Babs in a dress.

At the same time, in Britain, the name “Fanny Babs” is a much bawdier gag than it is over here. That illustrates something James Croft discusses in his thoughtful post “In defense of drag.” He’s talking specifically about the beloved tradition of the “Christmas Pantomime,” but what he says here applies equally to things like Charley’s Aunt or, for that matter, Twelfth Night:

Panto, then, occupies an interesting position in UK pop culture. On the one hand it is absolutely family entertainment. People regularly take their children to pantos, and many of the stars who perform in them are ones children would be more familiar with than their parents. Elements of the show, like the audience participation and nonsense songs, are designed to entertain children, and young children are often brought on stage for participatory scenes.

On the other hand, panto is explicit adult entertainment—and adult entertainment with a queer twist. Gender-bending is an essential part of the form, with the “principal boy” traditionally played by a woman, and the “pantomime dame” almost always played by a man. Characters like the wicked stepsisters in Cinderella are often played by men in drag, too. And the best pantomimes are suffused with double-entendres so extreme that adults are left in incredulous stitches.

 

Uncategorized

Previous Post



March 21, 2023

Bartender says 'Is this some kind of joke?'

Next Post



March 27, 2023 Baptism is ordination

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"https://uploads.disquscdn.c..."

Matri


The purpose-driven labor priest

"Fun Fact: According to the world health organization the death toll of Measles in the ..."

Skybison


The purpose-driven labor priest

"Saw Ken Russell's The Devils this evening.It's... very much a Ken Russell films. Also really ..."

Brandi


The purpose-driven labor priest

"https://uploads.disquscdn.c..."

Matri


The purpose-driven labor priest


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What was the first miracle Jesus performed according to John's Gospel?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Raising Lazarus Feeding the 5000 Walking on water Turning water into wine

Related posts from slacktivist

Family

The purpose-driven labor priest

slacktivist

Family

'A hermeneutical Pandora’s box'

slacktivist

Family

No, most white evangelicals are not 'egalitarian'

slacktivist

Family

LBCF: That beats all

slacktivist

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian

Westminister Abbey-- Part Two

One can get either depressed or impressed by walking around on the...

Theodore Dwight Weld: Evangelical Poster Boy to Drop...

Last time I discussed the spiritual crisis that engulfed Angelina Grimké in...

Jesus and the Law of Moses: An Interview...

It is my pleasure to interview Paul Sloan on his recent book,...

How Does Ặnāvâ Connect Katie Zacharia & Georgia?

This weekend, the big news has been the sudden departure of Trump’s...

The Woman We Remember by Her Wound

Śūrpaṇakhā Had a Heart Desire, humiliation, and the woman behind a turning...

6 Ways to Promote a Healthy Relationship

Karen, 42, and Kevin, 41, have been married for ten years and...

view all Progressive Christian blogs

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube