Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
Missionaries and Marines

Missionaries and Marines

Last updated on: March 18, 2023 at 6:10 pm by Fred Clark

0 Comments

Missionaries and Marines 2023-03-18T18:10:02-04:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

In 1915, US Marines invaded Haiti and took over the country, ruling it as a military dictatorship until 1934. The occupying military killed thousands of Haitians directly and imposed a system of unpaid, forced labor that led to thousands more dying in US-run work-camps.

This is a miserable, shameful chapter in American history. It’s a saga of reckless, brutal oppression in which the US military was deployed and degraded in service of private interests who enriched themselves by plundering the poorest of the poor. The end result was of no benefit to American national interests and it was an unmitigated disaster for the people of Haiti, creating the framework there for generations of dictatorial tyranny that defined that nation for most of the rest of the 20th century.

This photo from the 1940 AME General Conference identifies S.E. Churchstone Lord as second from left, but I’m not sure if that’s him standing or sitting. I couldn’t find any pictures of L. Ton Evans.

It’s an ugly story, devoid of nobility and honor and anything else that might make it attractive to contemplate. That makes it an extremely difficult story to talk about and so, mostly, we don’t talk about it. Even in history books and history classes. It’s an episode we rarely learn about and thus, also, an episode we steadfastly fail to learn from.

Even mentioning such aspects of American history will be perceived, by many, as a kind of attack — an attack on America as a whole but also, weirdly, as an attack on them personally. The word they’ve commandeered to express this lately is “woke,” but this recent innovation in the vocabulary of willful ignorance just gives a new name to an old refusal to discuss or mention anything like this. This is why people my age barely learned anything in school about slavery or the decimation of the Native Americans or Vietnam or Watergate, and the little that we were taught was, at best, misleading. These were ugly topics and therefore forbidden subjects.

Why, then, am I even mentioning this regrettable slice of American history? Is it because I hate America? Or is it because I am personally attacking some individual who will perceive this as an attempt to make them personally feel guilty or otherwise uncomfortable?

The timing certainly seems suspicious, given that this month is the 20th anniversary of the US-led invasion and occupation of Iraq. (Or, I suppose, it would seem suspicious, if that Big Round Number anniversary actually the basis for any substantial public discussion of that also-forbidden subject of unfortunate history.)

But actually I’ve been forced to think about this horrific, unjust and unjustifiable episode because of an article in Christianity Today.

Yes, Christianity Today.*

That’s where I read Andy Olsen’s extraordinary, thoughtful, fascinating piece on “What Evangelicals Owe Haiti.”

This may not be the first Christianity Today article to mention W.E.B. Du Bois or C.L.R. James, but I’m pretty sure it’s the first article in that publication to mention both of them positively.

Olsen offers a long, fascinating, look at the history of American Protestant missionary work in Haiti. He breaks that history into two stages, with the first stage being in the 1800s up through the start of the US Marine dictatorship and the second stage beginning after the U.S. withdrew its troops. He also highlights the laudable history of some missionaries during that authoritarian occupation, two in particular: “One was S. E. Churchstone Lord, a minister with the African Methodist Episcopal Church. The other was L. Ton Evans, a white Baptist pastor funded by the Lott Carey Society, a Black missions agency.”

Lord and Evans witnessed the brutality and corruption of the American occupation of Haiti — which lasted from 1915 to 1934 — and they boldly opposed it, both on the ground in Haiti and through whatever connections they had back in the US. Lord rallied the NAACP and the Black press to oppose the occupation. Evans lobbied the State Department and the Wilson and Harding administrations. They were both harassed and threatened by US military officials in Haiti. (Evans was arrested, twice, for preaching — “trying to ‘Christianize and mentally and morally develop these low’ Haitians” — and threatened at gunpoint by US Marines).

Olsen leans on UNC historian Chris Davis for this history of Lord and Evans and it’s almost enough to make me want to read Davis’ whole dissertation on the subject. (I wish I’d read that back in 2003 when I was writing and marching and shouting in opposition to the invasion of Iraq.)

The post-occupation history of American Protestant mission work in Haiti is more complicated and, frankly, rather depressing, but Olsen doesn’t shy from describing the ways that this second wave of colonial missions enabled — and sometimes actively supported — the Duvalier dictatorships, or the ways that the “nation of NGOs” has prevented Haiti from developing organized government.

One of the themes Olsen stresses is the massive scale of American evangelical mission work in Haiti. “As of 2020,” he writes, “roughly 1,700 career missionaries were serving in Haiti—one for every 7,000 people.” Some of those missionaries are still doing the kind of work that characterized the first stage of missions in that country — serving in hospitals and schools throughout Haiti. But the largest aspect of this contemporary “mission work,” Olsen suggests, is the business of “short-term mission trips” — a kind of spiritual tourism industry that he estimates brings 85,000 American evangelicals to Haiti every year, turning the country into “a playground for spiritual retreat”:

“We built a vast network of facilities across the country offering camp-like experiences,” Olsen says, “whose benefits, mission leaders have not been shy to admit, mostly accrue to visitors.”

Meanwhile, the end of the Cold War meant the end of American interest in Haiti as a proxy in the battle between Soviet-style communism and “the free world.” That ended US support for the Duvaliers and, thus, their form of Haitian dictatorship. But it didn’t end US meddling in Haitians right to govern themselves, hence the removal, reinstatement, and second removal of Haiti’s popularly elected theologian-president Jean-Bertrand Aristide. And the ensuing years in which the country has struggled to govern itself despite not being allowed to form or fund any government that might interfere with the modern equivalents of the National City Bank of New York.

That brings us to the present crisis, which Olsen summarizes at the beginning of his article:

Militant gangs in Haiti control most of the capital, Port-au-Prince, and significant territory in other cities. They extract bribes at gunpoint for every case of diapers, bag of rice, box of gauze, and gallon of gasoline that moves in or out of its seaport. They set fire to neighborhoods and mount coordinated attacks on police stations. They drag rivals from emergency room beds and execute them outside.

Thus, Haiti’s economy is in free fall. Its annualized inflation verges on 50 percent. Fuel in some areas fetches $10 a gallon on the black market. The nation is slipping into famine—a term, believe it or not, rarely before used there. Thousands of its people are swamping boats bound for South Florida and marching across continents and piling up against the US-Mexico border.

To face these crises, there is no government. Haiti’s putative head of state, prime minister and acting president Ariel Henry, took office after the brazen and bizarre 2021 assassination of an unpopular president. But Henry is also unpopular. He has long overstayed the constitutional limits of his term. To replace him, Haiti would need to hold elections; its last elections were so long ago that every chair in its legislature sits empty.

But Haiti cannot safely hold elections, because law enforcement is consumed with a battle against gangs that have become so powerful that young men who want to join them are reportedly put on waitlists. …

Last October, Henry asked the international community for “the immediate deployment of a specialized armed force, in sufficient quantity” to help contain the gangs.

Olsen isn’t enthusiastic about the prospect of international military intervention. He recognizes that “send in the Marines” is a terrible idea that has failed repeatedly. And he recognizes that the last time an international force was sent to Haiti it resulted in a cholera outbreak that killed tens of thousands. But given the current desperation he still wonders despite that if Henry’s plea/plan for intervention might be the least bad of the bad options now facing Haiti.

I wish S.E. Churchstone Lord and L. Ton Evans were still around to talk to about that. I suspect they wouldn’t look kindly at the idea and that they would, instead, prefer to see action from the international community that has already invaded and occupied much of Haiti — that army of missionaries.

That is what Olsen also seems to hope for. “If there is a next era of missions in Haiti, it will be judged by what we do in this moment.” And “Foreign evangelicals cannot end Haiti’s problems, but we can stop doing our own thing. Careful listening—to what Haitian churches want, to what Haitian community leaders want—will be one of the most powerful tools for building back a nation.”

This article doesn’t have, or claim to have, all the answers. But it’s a long, thoughtful discussion that, at least, raises many of the right questions.

Go read the whole thing.

* Kudos to Christianity Today for running this. They knew it would likely bring them hate-mail and cancel-my-subscription flouncing from the 81% of white evangelicals who pounce on any excuse they can find to denounce CT as “woke.” (No, really, this is a thing — especially in the SBC.)

Fortunately, the volume of hate-mail prompted by this article should be somewhat limited due to the fact that it’s long and uses big words. The kind of white evangelicals who would be most horrified by Olsen’s mention of W.E.B. Du Bois are also the kind of white evangelicals least likely to have ever heard of him.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

March 14, 2023

And it leaves me reeling

Next Post

March 20, 2023 Postcards from the class & culture wars (3.20.23)

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"Hoo boy is that ever going to depend on who's playing it. Hard to believe ..."

damanoid

The possibility of possibility

"https://uploads.disquscdn.c... Yes. I bought all of them several years ago. They're up all over my ..."

Rick

The possibility of possibility

"DnD and theatre were the two places I first met trans and gay peoples."

Hawker40

The possibility of possibility

"Yes. Lemme 'splain.For a lot of kids (12+, chiefly), D&D is one of the first ..."

Jim Roberts

The possibility of possibility

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month November 2026 October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does Romans say about the mind governed by the flesh versus the mind governed by the Spirit?

Select your answer to see how you score.

The mind governed by the flesh is death, but the mind governed by the Spirit is life and peace The flesh is weak, but the Spirit is strong The flesh leads to sin, but the Spirit leads to righteousness The flesh seeks itself, but the Spirit seeks God