Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
What did Jonathan Edwards know and when did he know it?

What did Jonathan Edwards know and when did he know it?

Last updated on: December 20, 2022 at 2:14 pm by Fred Clark

What did Jonathan Edwards know and when did he know it? 2022-12-20T14:14:29-05:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Are we really doing this again/still/forever?*

Sigh. OK.

Jonathan Edwards was a man of his time. That’s true for everyone, of course, other than, say, Dr. Sam Beckett or Billy Pilgrim. What this phrase usually means, though, is that the “man of his time” is someone who was complicit in the injustices and evils of his time. It’s a form of the sometimes legitimate objection we often raised as kids: “Why should I be punished when everybody else was doing the same thing?”

We weren’t entirely wrong to point that out to our teachers: Singling out one person for something unexceptional seems unfair. But we overstated our case with that superlative “everybody.”

It’s rarely ever the case that “everybody” was doing the same thing. Most people, perhaps, or surely “many others” — enough to make the behavior in question unexceptionally commonplace. Yet usually there are exceptions — others who are also people of that time believing and behaving differently. The past may be a foreign country, but no country is a homogenous collection of identical people behaving identically.

But let’s not be abstract: We’re talking about slavery. Here in America, talk of someone being a “man of his time” is almost always about slavery.

Thus, in the case of the slave-owning pastor and theologian Edwards, I have often noted this:

[The abolitionist] Benjamin Lay lived from 1681 to 1759. Somehow a person like Lay is never described as “a man of his time.” And yet we’ll apply that description to his contemporaries — like, say, Jonathan Edwards (1703-1758) — to excuse them for being unable to know any better. Edwards was a man of his time. He was also a man of Benjamin Lay’s time, and of John Woolman’s (1720-1772).

My objection there has been challenged by some historians who argue that it’s unfair and misleading to contrast Edwards with exceptional outliers like Lay and Woolman. Both were Quakers and were, in their lifetime, dissidents even with the limited realm of Quakerism. No fair comparing them as also being “men of their time” because they were actually “ahead of their time.”

Daniel Horsemanden was a man of his time. And of Edwards’ time.

But, of course, no one can actually be “ahead of their time” except for, again, someone like Sam Beckett or Billy Pilgrim (who are both, remember, fictional). What we mean by “ahead of their time” is that they were at odds with the majority of people in their time — that they were exceptional. It seems unfair to condemn someone for not being exceptional or for — like most people “of their time” — failing to heed the exceptional voices that 20/20 hindsight allows us to realize were right. (This is why Luke 16:29-31 must give these professional historians the heebie-jeebies.)

Hence Dr. John Fea’s insistence that Edwards’ time was almost wholly devoid of any anti-slavery voices of any consequence. He quotes Manisha Sinha’s The Slave’s Cause: “With few exceptions, Western thinkers had justified rather than challenged slavery”** and thus, Fea says, those seeking anti-slavery contemporaries to Jonathan Edwards “are pretty much left with Anthony Benezet, John Woolman, and the cave-dwelling dwarf Benjamin Lay.”

Well, sure, it’s possible to dismiss Benjamin Lay as a fringe figure with little or no influence because he was an irascible, theatrical, cave-dwelling dwarf but please re-read this sentence. Is there anything about Lay there that makes you less interested in him? Anything about being a “cave-dwelling dwarf” that makes you want to pay less attention?

Lay’s friend, admirer, and sometimes publicist, Benjamin Franklin helped to publish Lay’s All Slave-Keepers Apostates.*** That anti-slavery jeremiad was widely rejected, rather than widely embraced, but the key point here is the widely, not the rejected. Lay was notorious for causing scenes and he was very good at it. He was infamous but not un-famous. I’d bet that Edwards had heard of him and was at least vaguely aware of Lay’s argument.

But that doesn’t matter. Benjamin Lay is completely beside the point. So are Woolman and Benezet.

The dispute between Dr. Fea and his uppity bête noire on Twitter isn’t about the extent to which Edwards may or may not have encountered the dissenting arguments of those “few exceptions” among “Western thinkers.” The dispute, rather, is about the meaning of the incontrovertible fact that Edwards absolutely did encounter the dissenting witness of Venus, and Titus, and Joseph, and “Sue … wife to the said Jo.” They lived in his house.

This, I humbly submit, is the actual point of contention even though it is something neither Dr. Fea nor his interlocutor succeeds in articulating. I think that’s why they wind up wound up, angrily talking past one another without ever achieving disagreement.

The dispute is not about what it means that Edwards was a “man of his time,” but about what it means that Joseph was a also a man of Edwards’ time. It’s about whether, or how, Joseph’s life matters.

We cannot say that Edwards could not have known better because we cannot say he was of a generation that knew not Joseph. I’m quoting there from the King James Version of Exodus 1:8. Edwards stands indicted because, in the words of the NIV translation of that same verse, he was someone “to whom Joseph meant nothing.” If Joseph matters, too, then he merits the same empathy and generosity thus far denied him by those so intent on extending those lovely sentiments towards the man who enslaved him.

Or, as historian Malcolm Foley wrote in an essay I quoted here a few months ago:

I am reminded of the voices that call prominent theologians in the eighteenth and nineteenth century “men of their times” when referring to their virulently racist pro-slavery stances. It is not an imposition of a foreign standard that I apply when I call those stances virulently racist; it is the recognition and elevation of a standard contemporary to their own, namely that of the enslaved.

Jonathan Edwards was intimately acquainted with this standard contemporary to his own. He lived with (at least) four people who shared it.

Edwards is best known today for his most famous sermon, “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God.” The published version of this sermon is the one he read from when he delivered it on July 8, 1741, in Enfield, Connecticut. Four days earlier, in New York City, an enslaved Black man was burned at the stake.

This was part of the New York Conspiracy of 1741, a mass panic that began in April of that year resulting in show trials and dozens of public executions continuing throughout the spring and summer. The official death toll includes 13 enslaved men burned at the stake, 17 enslaved persons hanged, and two white men and two white women hanged after being named as participants in the purported conspiracy. That doesn’t include the countless others beaten, tortured, or killed by mobs of white New Yorkers convinced that a mass slave uprising was imminent.

The prosecution’s case was based largely on the testimony of one person who had been caught with stolen goods and was promised leniency (and financial reward) in exchange for naming names. All other evidence was the product of duress. The consensus view, today, is that there was no conspiracy and no slave revolt. It was simply a panic sparked by the fear — and the expectation — of such a revolt. It was mass hysteria based on the white majority’s recognition of the alternative standard contemporary to their own. They reasonably and rationally feared that the 10% of New Yorkers living in slavery would seek to revolt — to free themselves and to avenge the harms done to them — because that is what 100% of New Yorkers understood is what anyone would do in their circumstance.

Jonathan Edwards was likely aware of the chaos consuming New York City. It was big news in New England, where people still chafed at the mockery New Yorkers had directed toward them for decades after the debacle of the Salem witch trials. One New Englander — a Plymouth judge named Josiah Cotton — sent an anonymous letter to a lawyer involved in prosecuting the supposed “conspiracy.” Cotton’s letter chides the lawyer by comparing the city’s panic to that in Salem: “This occasion puts me in mind of our New England Witchcraft in the year 1692 Which if I don’t mistake New York justly reproached us for, and mocked at our Credulity about.”****

But, again, it doesn’t matter one way or another whether or not Edwards was aware of the 1741 Panic in New York. Either way, we know what he knew, what all of those terrified white New Yorkers knew. “Every white man there [had] this thought stowed somewhere or other in his mind. … It was a kind of secret which [they] all knew and were too clever to tell.”

*See previously:

6.20.14: Our job is to unlearn the lies we learned from the theologians of slavery
6.21.14: Unlearning the lies we learned from the theologians of slavery (part 2)
6.26.14: Unlearning the lies we learned from the theologians of slavery (part 3)
7.9.14: Whatever happened to the clobber texts for slavery? (Unlearning the lies, cont’d.)
8.21.14: The Hole in Noll: The whiteness of ‘[White] America’s God’
1.26.16: Slaves in the hands of an angry white God
4.18.16: What if we learned about the Bible from the people who got it right?
3.12.18: The Half Has Never Been Told
8.8.18: George Whitefield was worse than Hybels, Swaggart, Haggard, Patterson, Pressler, Bakker, Hinn, Tilton and all the rest put together
2.4.19: Bad Reputation: The right subject, the wrong question
2.8.19: ‘It was a kind of secret which we all knew and were too clever to tell’
2.10.19: If ‘we’ didn’t know, now ‘we’ know
2.13.19: Never been partial to shackles or chains
9.6.20: Most 21st-century white evangelicals oppose child-trafficking and rape. That’s new.
11.13.21: Father Abraham had many sons
3.15.22: ‘Onesimus’
8.22.22: No time like the present

** “Western” is, in this sentence, a limiting, qualifying, restrictive term. It bounds the parochial realm within which slavery was justified, rather than challenged, by “thinkers.” Note also that the immediately following sentence begins with the word “but”: “With few exceptions, Western thinkers had justified rather than challenged slavery. But popular prejudice against slavey had long been prevalent, at least since the collapse of serfdom in western Europe. Notions of inherent racial inferiority served to counter this sentiment.”

I’m not sure that Sinha is saying what Fea thinks here.

*** Full title: “All Slave-Keepers That keep the Innocent in Bondage, Apostates, Pretending to lay Claim to the Pure & Holy Christian Religion; of what Congregation so ever; but especially in their Ministers, by whose example the filthy Leprosy and Apostasy is spread far and near; it is a notorious Sin, which many of the true Friends of Christ, and his pure Truth, called Quakers, has been for many Years and still are concern’d to write and bear Testimony against; as a Practice so gross & hurtful to Religion, and destructive to Government, beyond what Words can set forth, or can be declared of by Men or Angels, and yet lived in by Ministers and Magistrates in America.” Phew.

**** Cotton goes on to say, “I entreat you not to go on to Massacre and destroy your own Estates by making Bonfires of the Negros and perhaps thereby loading yourselves with greater Guilt than theirs. For we have too much reason to fear that the Divine Vengeance does and will pursue us for our ill treatment to the bodies and souls of our poor slaves.”

So here, too, we find another contemporary witness to the then-evident evil of slavery.

Uncategorized

history

slavery

Previous Post

December 20, 2022

12/20 Flashback: Livin' easy, lovin' free

Next Post

December 21, 2022 12/21 Flashback: Half-way out of the dark

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month November 2026 October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What kind of bird did Noah send out second from the ark?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Owl Dove Pidgeon Eagle