BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian
Beliefs
- Buddhist
- Catholic
- Contemplative
- Evangelical
- General Christian
- Hindu
- Jewish
- Latter-day Saint
- More Voices
- Muslim
- New Visions
- Pagan
- Progressive Christian
Topics
- Religion News
- Food and Religion
- Sports and Religion
- Religious Art
- Religious Music and Entertainment
- Religious Events
- History and Religion
- Style and Religion
- Politics and Religion
- Women in Religion
- Recreation Outdoors and Religion
- Business Finance and Religion
- Careers Workplace and Religion
- Education and Religion
- Family Parenting and Religion
- Health Fitness and Religion
- Home and Religion
- Relationships and Religion
- Technology and Religion
- Travel and Religion
Columnists
- Buddhist Columnists
- Business Finance and Religion Columnists
- Careers Workplace and Religion Columnists
- Catholic Columnists
- Contemplative Columnists
- Education and Religion Columnists
- Evangelists Columnists
- Family Parenting and Religion Columnists
- General Christian Columnists
- Health Fitness and Religion Columnists
- Hindu Columnists
- History and Religion Columnists
- Home and Religion Columnists
- Jewish Columnists
- More Voices Columnists
- Latter Day Columnists
- Muslim Columnists
- New Visions Columnists
- Nonreligious Columnists
- Pagan Columnists
- Politics and Religion Columnists
- Progressive Columnists
- Recreation Outdoors and Religion Columnists
- Relationships and Religion Columnists
- Religion News Columnists
- Religious Art Columnists
- Religious Events Columnists
- Religious Music and Entertainment Columnists
- Sports and Religion Columnists
- Style and Religion Columnists
- Technology and Religion Columnists
- Travel and Religion Columnists
- Women in Religion Columnists
Resource Library
- 2026 Calendar
- Library of World Religions
- The 100 Most Holy Places on Earth
- Patheos Answers
- Podcasts
- Videos
- Faith Leaders Database
- Anglican Episcopalian
- Bahai
- Baptist
- Buddhism
- Christianity
- Confucianism
- Eastern Orthodoxy
- Hinduism
- Holiness and Pentecostal
- ISKCON
- Islam
- Judaism
- Lutheran
- Methodist
- The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
- New Age
- Paganism
- Presbytarian and Reformed
- Protestantism
- Religion Behind the Scenes
- Roman Catholic
- Scientology
- Shia Islam
- Sikhism
- Sufism
- Sunni Islam
- Taoism
- Zen
- See all religions
Research Tools
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
- Trending:
- Forgiveness
- |
- Marriage
- |
- Consciousness
- |
- Death Penalty
- |
- Election
- |
- Halloween
- Home
- Progressive Christian
- 9/21 Flashback: Purity
9/21 Flashback: Purity
Last updated on: September 21, 2022 at 7:00 am by Fred Clark
9/21 Flashback: Purity 2022-09-21T06:41:46-04:00 Fred Clark
Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.
From September 21, 2016, “‘To keep oneself unstained by the world’”
The specific context for this post was something Donald Trump Jr. said that was cruel, evil, selfish, and stunted. That was six years ago, of course, and since then he and his father have said and done so many cruel, evil, selfish, stunted things that you may have lost track of this specific one, so here’s a refresher: “Donald Trump Jr compares Syrian refugees to Skittles.”
“Religion that is pure and undefiled before God, the Father, is this: to care for orphans and widows in their distress, and to keep oneself unstained by the world.” — James 1:27
It seems that James the Just is being unfair. He’s telling us to keep “pure and undefiled” and “unstained by the world.” But then he’s also telling us to be tangibly present in the world — to “care for orphans and widows in their distress.” Seems like a contradiction.
Just try to “care for orphans” while not getting at least a little bit dirty. Kids are a mess. And widows? Well, now you’re talking about single women. Care for them and tongues will wag — people will start to talk and to speculate and soon your reputation will be anything but pure, undefiled, and unstained.
Let’s face it — orphans and widows are part of the world. So if the goal is to remain pure and “unstained by the world,” then any contact with such orphans and widows puts that sacred purity at risk.
If we have to incur such a risk to deal with these worldly orphans and widows, then the safest course would seem to be to keep them at arm’s length. Otherwise their distress is going to become yours — it’s going to get all over you. So if you’re going to care for them, you’ll want to do it from a safe distance. Maybe set up some intermediaries and then write a check.
Even then, though, there’s no guarantee you’ll be able to maintain your undefiled purity while caring for these dangerous orphans and widows. Caring for them means accepting responsibility for them, and responsibility always entails the possibility of incurring guilt. What if one of these orphans you’re caring for grows up to become a criminal? Congratulations — you’re now responsible for that. You are thereby impure and defiled. Any one of those widows might do … well, almost anything really, and that would all come back to reflect on you.
Look, we’re called to be holy as God is holy. And how does God maintain God’s divine holiness? By avoiding the world — staying apart from it up there in Heaven and not rushing down here to risk getting stained and defiled by us filthy humans.
To understand what’s at risk here, let’s think of all those worldly orphans and widows you might be caring for as — oh, I don’t know, let’s say a big bowl of Skittles:

Each of those Skittles represents one orphan or widow — most of which you can probably safely eat/care for without their distress completely soiling and staining your otherwise pure and undefiled religion. But three of them — and you can’t know which ones — are actually deadly poison. Eat them and you will die!
(I know that’s frightening, but please understand that I’m not trying to make you lose your mind and the continence of your bowels in a gibbering panic at the thought of eating Skittles. I’m simply trying to make you lose your mind and the continence of your bowels in a gibbering panic at the thought of caring for orphans and widows.)
Do you see what’s at stake here? Can you really afford to risk having your pure and undefiled religion getting indelibly stained by these filthy, worldly orphans and widows?
Purity is the main thing here, after all — retaining the unsullied perfection of our undefiled religion. The whole orphans and widows bit is really just thrown in there as an afterthought for those who feel kind of weird just sitting around, avoiding the world, stayin’ pure and undefiled. But clearly it’s optional. Extra-credit, maybe, but not required. The emphasis is all on being spotless and stainless when we stand before God, who is, of course, a harsh judge who reaps where he did not sow and gathers where he did not scatter seed. Best to err on the side of safety, purity, and shutting out the defiling world.
Sure, there are liberals out there who see this verse differently. Those liberals refuse to see the obvious contradiction in this verse — they refuse to recognize that these biblical commands are irreconcilably at odds with each other, and that we have to choose one or the other.
So those liberals will try to say that being defiled and stained by “the world” doesn’t mean avoiding the world around us, building walls and hiding from our unclean, unsafe, and probably poisonous neighbors. They’ll try to confuse the issue by pointing out that “God so loved the world” — like we’re the ones who don’t understand John 3:16! (As if we didn’t understand our own bumper-stickers and temporary tattoos!) They’ll go on about how what James means here by “the world” is what Paul talks about when he says “our struggle is not against enemies of blood and flesh, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the cosmic powers of this present darkness.”
It’s like these liberals refuse to understand that “the world” James is talking about — the big, scary, dirty, poisoned-candy world all around us — is obviously the blood-and-flesh orphans and widows and neighbors our pure religion requires us to keep at bay.
They’ll even go so far as to insist that this sentence from James makes sense — that he’s presenting a coherent, single thought rather than an obviously impossible contradiction. They’ll argue that what James is really saying is that the definition of purity, of being undefiled and unstained by the world, is being the kind of people who care for orphans and widows in their distress. They’ll try to make it out as though James is actually telling us to do that — like he thinks caring for poisonous orphans and filthy widows is some kind of good thing that pleases God.
That’s why you can’t trust liberals. They’re worldly.
Previous Post

September 20, 2022
Eleven herbs and spices
Next Post

September 21, 2022 Data polls and money polls
Browse Our Archives
Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized
Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003
Follow Us!
TAKE THE
Religious Wisdom Quiz
What sign does Paul give in 2 Thessalonians as his authentic mark in every letter?
Select your answer to see how you score.
A special blessing His greeting in his own handwriting His signature His seal
Related posts from slacktivist
Smart people saying smart things (10.20.26)
Some obscure footnotes of white evangelical history
The purpose-driven labor priest
'A hermeneutical Pandora’s box'
TRENDING AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian
The Ravana We Burn, the Ravana We Worship
From the Gond communities of central India to the Brahmins of Rajasthan...
Smart people saying smart things (10.20.26)
Take time to listen to Libby Garland, Molis Augustave, Nicole Noren, Soraya...
The Abolition of Man: Appendix: The Tao
Here I continue our discussion of C. S. Lewis’s book The Abolition...
The Wall That Heals I remember the Vietnam War. I was...
Reflections on the Attempted Revolution in France
Last night, flipping through some of the television channels before flipping...
October and the Psychology of Spooky Season
Every October, something curious happens. People who spend most of the year...
view all Progressive Christian blogs
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
- About Us
- 2026 Calendar
- Videos
- Podcasts
- Library of World Religions
- Faith In Media Tracker
- Advertise With Us
- Write for Us
- Privacy Policy
- Terms of Service
- Do Not Sell My Data
- Contact Us
- Radiant Digital
- Manage Newsletter Subscriptions
- Unsubscribe From Notifications
- Sitemap
Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.
Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In











