Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
A political scientist, a pastor, and an Ivy League professor

A political scientist, a pastor, and an Ivy League professor

Last updated on: July 26, 2022 at 3:59 pm by Fred Clark

A political scientist, a pastor, and an Ivy League professor 2022-07-26T15:59:16-04:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

It sounds like a joke: A political scientist, a pastor, and an Ivy League professor of religious studies walk into a bar …

But it’s not a joke. Just three observers making the same observation from very different angles. (None of these folks, as far as I know, developed any of their insights due to reading this blog — but they could have.)

• This (via Off the Kuff) is Mark Caro’s fascinating profile of a researcher and his research: “The Big Truth.” Subhed: “University of Chicago professor Robert Pape has spent the past year and a half examining the January 6 insurrectionists — and sounding the alarm about the future of democracy. Is America listening?”

The research Pape and his team are doing helps us to understand the millions of our neighbors who see violence as a legitimate tool to prevent the full equality of people they do not regard as legitimate Americans. That’s not quite how Pape would put it, but since he points to belief in “replacement theory” as the key factor here, it fits. Those who believe in that theory therefore also believe that any election not determined by only the votes of their irreplaceable kind — white, Christian, straight — shouldn’t count.

Pape’s scrupulous research, his measuring and re-measuring and number-crunching, has led him to a conclusion that won’t be surprising to most historians:

By April 2021, CPOST had analyzed 377 Americans arrested or charged in the Capitol attack and was able to go into greater detail about demographics and attitudes. “The people alleged by authorities to have taken the law into their hands on Jan. 6 typically hail from places where non-White populations are growing fastest,” Pape wrote in a Washington Post column, noting that two independent surveys conducted by CPOST indicated that the biggest driver was “fear of the ‘Great Replacement.’”

The riot and insurrection of January 6 thus turns out to be one more example of a well-established pattern: The growing acceptance of non-white populations prompts fear and violence from some white Americans who see that violence as a legitimate response to any threat to their exclusive legitimacy. It’s Wilmington and Colfax and Tulsa and Rosewood and a century of lynching. It’s Metacomet’s severed head on a spike as the symbol of our shining city on a hill.

White Bostonians celebrate the Bicenntennial. (Stanley Forman/Boston Herald American, 1976)

That’s all terribly grim, and Pape’s matter-of-fact confirmation of this enduring grimness has me desperately seeking to distract myself. So reading that piece, I kept thinking that this motley crew of Midwestern researchers would be a terrific setting for a Three Days of the Condor-style thriller in which their research inadvertently stumbles across some evidence that nefarious conspirators don’t want them to know. (This would, alas, not bode well for the story’s version of Pape’s character, or for most of his team apart from the one plucky researcher who winds up on the run, etc. etc.) I’m a sucker for that story in all its forms — from the recent Epix series version of Condor, to North by Northwest, or Enemy of the State, or even The Man With One Red Shoe. But my impulse here to turn from grim reality to escapist story-telling isn’t helpful.

It’s comforting to retreat into stories that imagine our biggest challenge is caused by a nefarious, but small conspiracy of shadowy evildoers whose grand scheme might be overcome by one resourceful and determined underdog protagonist. But Pape’s research confirming all that grim history points to something far more daunting and difficult to address:

Violence organized and carried out by far-right militant organizations is disturbing, but it at least falls into a category familiar to law enforcement and the general public. However, a closer look at the people suspected of taking part in the Capitol riot suggests a different and potentially far more dangerous problem: a new kind of violent mass movement in which more “normal” Trump supporters — middle-class and, in many cases, middle-aged people without obvious ties to the far right — joined with extremists in an attempt to overturn a presidential election.

And, according to Pape and his research, there are 18 or 20 million such people living all across the country. These are our neighbors. And so, ultimately, the task of dealing with them does not fall exclusively to Pape and his brilliant researchers, or to the congressional panels for which he’s called to testify, or to some intrepid journalist who will receive the Maguffin from Robert Redford and publish the definitive exposé that will fix everything. We all have our parts to play as neighbors.

• On a related note, here’s former Southern Baptist leader Russell Moore on how “Fantasy Role-Playing Is Hurting America.”

Don’t worry, that’s not an old-school, ’80s-style anti-D&D rant. Moore is writing about the preference many Americans now show for a make-believe realm in which they can pretend to be heroes, but not as a game or a hobby — as a way of life that’s reshaping their politics, religion, and relationships.

This is, in other words, a variation of the argument that Russell Moore blocked me for making on Twitter years ago. It’s Moore’s attempt to do what I wrote about here 14 years ago (and have repeated ad nauseum ever since):

You can’t be doing well if it seems like an improvement to base your life and your sense of self on a demonizing slander that you know is only a fantasy. To challenge that fantasy, to identify it as nothing more than that, is to threaten to send them back to whatever their lives were like before they latched onto this desperate alternative.

That suggests to me that if we are to have any hope of disabusing them of their fantasies, then we will need to recommend some third alternative, something other than the lie or the reality that had seemed even worse.

It’s encouraging to see this argument adopted by someone like Moore. It’s good to see him reminding his audience of white evangelical pastors that their parishioners are getting caught up in things like QAnon and Great Replacement conspiracy theories because those congregants do not center their lives or their identities or their source of meaning on the gospel that those pastors are supposed to be preaching.

Now to gently, gently nudge him in the hopes that he will start to see where this leads.

• That piece from Moore and a similar recent RNS column by Donovan Schaefer have me thinking that I could start a new revenue stream for this blog by renting out my hobby horses. “Buying into conspiracy theories can be exciting – that’s what makes them dangerous,” Schaefer writes. (The column even includes a variation of Mulder’s “I Want To Believe” poster.)

Like Moore, he recognizes that conspiracy theories aren’t mainly fueled by misinformation or ignorance, but by feelings. Specifically, by the need to escape into an alternate reality in which you’re the smart one, the good one, the brave and courageous and heroic one.

Schaefer — a religious studies prof at Penn — writes:

Much of the commentary on conspiracy theories presumes that followers simply have bad information, or not enough, and that they can be helped along with a better diet of facts.

But anyone who talks to conspiracy theorists knows that they’re never short on details, or at least “alternative facts.” They have plenty of information, but they insist that it be interpreted in a particular way – the way that feels most exciting.

Schaefer and Moore offer the same diagnosis. Schaefer seems a bit further along in recognizing the template and trajectory of Satanic baby-killerism. I suppose that’s because, unlike Moore, he hasn’t spent the past 30 years as a professional enforcer of Satanic baby-killerism in its politest, most mainstream form.

evangelicals

Satanic baby-killers

Previous Post

July 26, 2022

7/26 Flashback: Solidarity

Next Post

July 27, 2022 7/27 Flashback: YNATKC

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: 2 John is addressed to Gaius, the beloved friend.

Select your answer to see how you score.

FALSE TRUE