Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
Immoderate

Immoderate

Last updated on: July 14, 2022 at 3:55 pm by Fred Clark

Immoderate 2022-07-14T15:55:53-04:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

OK, so I just got a promotion at the Big Box. I’m heading back to the night shift, mainly to do what I used to do during my previous pre-pandemic stint on the night shift, but for (a bit) more money.

Working overnights isn’t optimal, but even a sub-optimal set schedule will be an improvement over the erratic, prediction- and plan-defying, never-the-same-shift-twice-in-a-row chaos of the work schedule I’ve had for the past year. That predictability makes it a lot easier to write and to post and to carve out chunks of attention for this here blog. So that’s Good News.

What’s not Good News is that you won’t be able to write “Congratulations on your promotion” in comments here because it seems that “promotion” gets flagged as a restricted word by our comment filtering. If that word appears in a comment, that comment disappears into the limbo of “pending” comments. My full-time assistant can then log into our comment moderation portal and approve the controversial comment in question, thereby allowing it to be posted, somewhat belatedly.

But, alas, I do not have a full-time assistant. Or the time to make this a second full-time job for myself.

So I’m going to see what I can arrange with our hosts here at Patheos about freeing this particular blog from some of the restricted-word filters used in our automated moderation. (And also what I can do about, say, barring sea-lioning, dim-witted, fingers-in-their-ears, boastfully ignorant trolls from tracking their sophomoric filth all over the place as “guest commenters.”)

I apologize for the bewilderment and frustration that many of you have encountered thanks to that restricted-words filter. But I’m happy to see that many of you have also come to appreciate the unintentional hilarity of it and the puzzle-solving dilemma of trying to parse whatever it was the filter was intending to do.

Sometimes that’s easy to figure, as some of the restricted words are obviously naughty or likely rude. Among those recently flagged by the filter are: “fuck,” “STFU,” “shit,” “poop,” “bowels,” “feces,” “naked,” “butt,” “masturbate,” “scum,” “jerk,” “anus,” “pee,” “porn,” “asshole,” “jackass,” “idiot,” “dumb,” “pinko commie,” and “bastards.”

I get that. The desire to keep things “family friendly” even seems commendably well-intentioned. And, accompanied by a full-time human assistant, this filter could serve to ensure that our cooler heads and better angels prevail.

But this algorithmic approach, like all censors, betrays itself to have a dirtier mind than those it seeks to protect or to protect against. Hence this filter’s rejection of the following restricted words even when the context was far-removed from the filter’s filthy imagination:

“sucking” (Ross Perot quote)
“screwed” (up)
“screw” (loose)
“bowels” (quoting Oliver Cromwell)
Ever seen a Mobius strip? It’s hot. Take it off, baby. Take it ALL off.

“naked” (in the sense of transparent or stark)
“Homo” (erectus)
“Homo” (sapiens)
“who’re” (as a contraction of who are)
“weed” (gardening, not Reefer Madness)
“bag” (the noun, not the pejorative poetical suffix)
“bag” (the verb, not the pejorative poetical suffix)
“hard on” (the adjective meaning stern or strict, not the noun meaning an erection)
“knob” (a dial on an AC unit, not a British penis)
“bone” (skeletal noun, not a reference to the bone-like texture of sexually engorged soft tissue)
“bone” (china)
“blow” (several non-fellatio-related uses of this verb)
“strip” (Möbius)
“strip” (verb, but not in the sense of an ecdysiast)
“pre-teen” (it’s really creepy that the filter finds every reference to this age group to be really creepy)
“penetrate” (the hull of a UFO, nonsexually, I think)
“hooters” (owls, not breasts)
“Beaver” (Leave It To)
“seaman” (actual mariners, not the homophone)
“thrust” (noun meaning gist, not as sex-related verb)
“virgin” (Mary)
“Oral” (Roberts)

Having a pertinent, inoffensive comment filtered for any of those reasons (and those are all actual examples) tends to be mystifying and infuriating — the kind of thing that makes one exclaim a string of words that are likely also restricted by the filter. And again, I’m sorry that this has been happening.

But I’m glad that many of you have also come to appreciate the comic aspects of this absurd AI Comstock. It’s always, on some level, funny when you have to pause and think before realizing that the prudes always turn out to be much dirtier-minded than the rest of us. (And that you’ll perhaps also find it partly reassuring, as it’s evidence that the Rise of the Machines and our tyrannical SkyNet overlords are still a good ways off.)

Similar problems afflict the filter’s also well-intentioned attempts to prevent scammy spam from cluttering up our comment sections. That’s why you can’t say “promotion” or mention that you “work from home.”

Some of the words this filter restricts are a bit harder to find any well-intentioned explanation for.

“Lesbian” is restricted, I guess because it’s a term the filter’s designers think of primarily as a potential PornHub search term. You know what’s far, far worse than using any of the restricted words in this filter? Reducing the humanity of other people to the extent that their very existence can’t be mentioned and revealing that you think of them, primarily, as a sub-category of porn. I try to avoid using phrases like “the heteronormative male gaze” but sometimes I guess you just gotta. Sexualizing the existence of other humans and then therefore barring any mention of their existence as inappropriately sexual is DeSantis-level eliminationist fascist crap.

The word “menstruation” is also restricted, which — at best — has big NASA-sending-Sally-Ride-into-space-for-four-days-with-a-year’s-worth-of-tampons vibes. Let’s be charitable and presume it’s just that kind of incomprehensible refusal to find a clue rather than something more deliberately Gilead-ish and patriarchal. (Although, of course, I’m not sure that distinction holds up.)

Some religious terms are restricted words, which is confounding for a site meant to celebrate and equip us all for life together in a robustly pluralistic society.

“Islam” and “Muhammad” are restricted. I suspect, depressingly, this restriction applies to Christian blogs here due to the hard-learned lesson that their use is likelier to be disrespectful and insulting than to be simple references to the religion of more than a billion of our neighbors. That’s probably a well-intentioned restriction, then, but it puts us in the uncomfortable place of standing alongside the increasingly genocidal religious nationalists of the BJP who also refuse to allow those words to be uttered.

“Arian” is also a restricted word. That one’s just funny. Particularly since reciting the Athanasian Creed would get your comment filtered (“flesh,” “bodily”) and because, I imagine, either “homoiousios” or “homoousios” would get you flagged.

Then there’s the word “slave.” This word was previously forbidden from being spoken in the US Congress because the “peculiar institution” was simultaneously understood — unanimously — to be both a monstrously unjust atrocity and the essential pillar of our laws, culture, religion and government. So, Congress decided it was best just to avoid thinking about it and to forbid even saying the word for the first, oh, four-score and seven or so years of our history.

That was Very Bad then. And, for John Quincy Adams’ sake, it’s Very Bad to include that word now in any list of “restricted words.” The only people that helps are those who are fighting — aggressively and, as ever, violently — to ensure that we never come to grips with, repent from, or correct the vast, monumental, and existential horror of the American Holocaust.

Really the only civil and appropriate response to efforts to once again bar any mention of slavery is to go full-Carlin and resort to a bunch of those restricted words from the first list up there at the top.

I will, however, refrain from starting there when I raise these concerns with our hosts.

Anyway, again, I’m sorry for the inconvenience and the Orwellian funny business. And I’ll try to address it. Thank you for your patience.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

July 14, 2022

When concordance-ism eats itself

Next Post

July 15, 2022 7/15 Flashback: Malice

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What was the name for a standard silver coin in Biblical times?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Shekel Mina Denarius Talent