6/12 Flashback: A Fermi’s paradox Christmas carol

Last updated on: June 12, 2022 at 7:00 am by Fred Clark

6/12 Flashback: A Fermi’s paradox Christmas carol 2022-06-11T13:53:19-04:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

From June 12, 2019, “Where is everybody?”

The New York Times just did another of its long, strange stories about UFOs: “‘Wow, What Is That?’ Navy Pilots Report Unexplained Flying Objects.” (CBS News has a summary here if you want to read a paywall-free version.)

As with several similar stories from The Times on this subject, the article takes pains to maintain that these sightings are unexplained and unidentified. “What is that?” the pilot asks, because he doesn’t know and cannot say. And neither can the reporters for The Times or anyone else.

“Shepherds Witness UAP” by Henry Ossawa Tanner (1911)

But these articles all also seem to be written, and seem intended to be read, by people who quite clearly have a specific identification and explanation in mind: space aliens.

Which brings us back to Fermi’s paradox or, as he put it, “Where is everybody?”

The story goes that the physicist Enrico Fermi wound up in a conversation with several equally brilliant colleagues about the billions of Earth-like planets orbiting billions of other suns, and what they all agreed was the extremely high probability that intelligent life had come to exist on many such other worlds long before it came about here. They were all quite sure that such intelligent life must exist, must have a huge technological head start on us, and must surely be interested — as we are — in exploring the rest of the universe. So where are they? Why haven’t we yet found any evidence of their existence or of their technology and its effects?

One obvious solution to this paradox is that it isn’t a paradox at all — that Fermi and his fellow scientists were simply wrong to conclude that such other intelligent life and other civilizations exist anywhere other than here on Earth. Maybe there is no “everybody.” Maybe we are unique and alone and it’s just us with no one else and nothing else out there in all that empty space.

That’s possible, but as unsatisfying as it is unlikely. Fermi and his colleagues and thousands of other smarter, more knowledgeable people than me all seem certain that “everybody” must be out there, and they’ve outlined many formidable reasons why they think so. So again, if they’re all right about that, then where is everybody? What accounts for their apparent absence? Or, more precisely, what accounts for the apparent absence of any solid evidence of their existence?

This is a fun question that has prompted many fascinating suggestions. Maybe they’re all just avoiding us due to some benign principle of advanced civilizations that forbids meddling with relatively backwards folks like us. Maybe the hard limits preventing faster-than-light travel or interstellar communication are insurmountable and neither we nor “everybody” will ever be able to learn of one another’s existence. Maybe they’re out there, but they’re deliberately hiding. Maybe their technology is such that we’re not yet able to recognize what it is we’re already seeing.

Or maybe they’re already here, walking among us, disguised as us or somehow even thoroughly transformed so as to become like us.

Those last two words — “like us” — might be the biggest obstacle for trying to think about Fermi’s question. We can’t assume that whatever “everybody” might be out there would be, in any way, like us. Yet we also can’t help but think about them in that way because it’s the only frame of reference available to us for pondering such “alien” intelligence. We think about what we would be doing if we somehow had access to faster-than-light travel — exploration, discovery, conquest, plunder — and we can’t avoid projecting that onto “everybody” out there. So maybe we’re faced with an apparent paradox only because we’re not capable of comprehending a truly otherworldly point of view.

That same problem surely exists, also, for “everybody” as well.

Their world may be infinitely more advanced and wiser than our own, but that wouldn’t make them any more capable of understanding our point of view or how the universe appears to us. Such superior intelligence or wisdom would only make them more acutely aware of the difficulty of understanding the different way we see things. So how might such a hypothetically superior “everybody” go about trying to understand us?

Well, this is where I think the “They Walk Among Us” crowd might be on to something. Not so much the theories about aliens disguised as humans, sent here as spies to orchestrate some nefarious grand scheme (although that would explain a lot), but because walking and living among us would seem like the best way to come to understand who we are, what we are, how we think, and how the universe looks from our point of view.

It wouldn’t be enough for them to just put on a disguise. To really understand us, they’d need their explorers to somehow become us — to assume our form in a way that they could immerse themselves in our perspective, from cradle to grave, yet still somehow maintain their otherworldly identity so that they would be able to report back their findings and allow “everybody” to learn from that.

So imagine this has happened. What would “everybody” learn from it? What would they learn from taking on our form and our life, being born and growing up and living and working among us? Imagine some “everybody” born into some nobody here, some random someone in some backwards backwater town with all the indignities and injustices such a life here entails. It would be as miserable for them as it is and has been for billions of us, but added to that would be the immense frustration borne of their knowledge that life doesn’t have to be like that.

That frustration would compel them to say as much — to point out to their “fellow” humans that life here, and our way of seeing and thinking about life here, could and should be very different, could and should be better and kinder and richer and more just.

And then what would happen to them? The same thing that always happens whenever anybody has the temerity to suggest such a thing. The boot would come down, hard, on the apparently human face. The explorer from “everybody” would be silenced, extinguished, probably killed really hard, thus concluding the experiment.

And I imagine, if all of that had ever happened, that it would account for the apparent paradox that Enrico Fermi articulated. Where is everybody? They came, they saw, they withdrew. And now they’re avoiding us, perhaps, until we demonstrate that we’re capable of desiring — let alone of becoming — anything better.

Is this meant to suggest that Fermi’s Paradox can be a useful way of thinking about the incarnation? Or is it meant to suggest that the incarnation can be a useful way of thinking about Fermi’s Paradox? Yes.

Playing with the idea that Jesus may have been born and lived here among us as a kind of experiment and exploration by a superior alien intelligence may strike some as irreverent, but it’s something the creeds all affirm. But if that line of thinking seems uncomfortable, then don’t think about Jesus when reading any of the musings above. Think about Nat Turner instead.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

June 11, 2022

6/11 Flashback: Unfair is unkind

Next Post

June 12, 2022 What I like to do is see it and everything and stuff

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What Old Testament law was summarized as "love your neighbor as yourself"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

First five commandments Book of Leviticus only The whole law Only 10th commandment