Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
‘I Found It!’

‘I Found It!’

Last updated on: March 22, 2022 at 12:51 pm by Fred Clark

‘I Found It!’ 2022-03-22T12:51:40-04:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Just finished a four-video evangelism course at the Big Box on how to spread the Good News of the easy, convenient financing options that could be yours today if only you pause for just a moment to pray the sinner’s prayer apply for our company credit card. I couldn’t help but think of every evangelism/”witnessing”/proselytizing training seminar I’d ever attended because of the wildly implausible role-playing scenarios in these videos.

Big Box Associate: Have you heard about all of the Big Box’s easy and convenient financing options?

Extremely Realistic Customer: No, but I’d love to. Please tell me more!

BBA: [Demonstrates the best-practices three-point approach to convincing customers to apply for credit card.]

ERC: That sounds great! Please show me how to apply! Let us do so, now, posthaste!

I’m a bit baffled by this. If most (any) customers were this eager to hear about and apply for our credit cards, then none of us would need training videos to help us convince them to do so. These videos ensure that our associates are well-prepared for the highly improbable circumstance of encountering a real, live customer who follows the script recited by the hypothetical ERC. But they also make it far likelier that our associates will be adrift, frustrated, and stymied whenever they try this script on actual customers who haven’t memorized their half of the dialogue.

I’ve come to believe that producing such confusion and frustration is an intentional feature of many of those bad evangelism-training seminars. I think they’re designed to increase in-group solidarity and loyalty by deliberately instigating off-script conversations with outsiders, thus causing the bewildered insiders attempting such conversations to view all such outsiders with greater suspicion and hostility.

But while that might explain the inept and unhelpfully optimistic “role-play scenarios” in those awkward evangelism campaigns, it doesn’t explain why profit-seeking corporate training videos would emulate them so closely.

Sometimes, of course, the over-eager earnestness of those evangelistic seminars was just a product of innocence and naiveté. The Very Nice People leading us through those role-playing scenarios genuinely seemed to expect that the conversations they were teaching us to start would go according to their script. After all, we were heading out to offer our neighbors the choice between eternity in Heaven and eternity in Hell, so why wouldn’t they all, instantly, be eager to hear and accept everything we had to say?

Granted, these evangelism gurus ought to have known better. They had tried these techniques themselves, after all, so surely they had already experienced, many times, the same frustration we were all being sent out to experience, in which every would-be convert we approached stubbornly refused to say anything even remotely similar to the eagerly receptive lines our practice scripts provided them. But as veteran soul-winners, they had also sometimes succeeded against all odds in stumbling across occasional converts this way. It might be a numbers game, with dozens of approaches for every successful attempt, but the thrill of those exceptional cases, their idea of the eternal stakes involved, and the human capacity for selective memory perhaps combined to allow them to reassure themselves, and us, that their implausibly scripted conversations accurately portrayed something that might happen (or that, in their view, should happen, or that they hoped would happen).

The first such big evangelistic effort I remember was the “I Found It!” campaign organized by Campus Crusade back in the mid-1970s. Our white fundamentalist church was all-in on that nationwide mass-evangelism blitz. We took up an offering to help purchase the “I Found It!” billboards the campaign put up throughout our area of Central Jersey. We had a Sunday evening evangelism seminar training us to welcome the wave of converts we should expect from this multimedia national event, after which we all slapped “I Found It!” bumper stickers on our cars, and every member of the congregation received, and proudly wore, a friendly blue “I Found It!” button.

I wore that button every day for months, yet no one ever approached me and asked, “What did you find?” thereby giving me the opportunity to answer, “I found new life in Christ, and you can too!” I figured my own lack of success was due to the fact that I was just a little kid, and that I spent nearly all of my time either at church or at our private Christian school, surrounded by other believers. But I’m not sure those buttons “worked” any better for the grown-ups in our congregation, even those who wore them every day out in the secular world of our Hell-bound neighbors.

Despite all of that, we were assured that the “I Found It!” campaign was a huge success. The cryptic billboards funded by our offering and the offerings of thousands of other churches across the country had enticed thousands upon thousands of people to call the phone numbers posted, asking the trained volunteers “What did you find?” and giving those volunteers the chance to say, “I found new life in Christ … and you can too!” And, we were told, thousands of those callers then said, “Tell me more,” just like in the script, and were led in the Sinner’s Prayer, and given contact information for local churches connected to the campaign.

So even though our own church didn’t gain any new members from the campaign, we were glad to think that other churches did and that, because of our financial contributions to the cause, the Lord was adding to the church daily such as should be saved.

Those memories of billboards, buttons, and bumper stickers came flooding back when I read this Christianity Today piece by Maria Baer last week: “$100M Ad Campaign Aims to Make Jesus the ‘Biggest Brand in Your City’.”

I cringed when I read that headline, and cringed tighter when I read this — “McKendry said approaching American Christianity’s image problem with business savvy is what Jesus would have done.” And by the time I reached the end of the article I found myself wracked in the kind of full-body cringe that it’ll take me a few hours to unclench from.

This new marketing campaign isn’t even billing itself as evangelism. It’s explicitly being described as a marketing campaign designed to address an “image problem” and to create a more positive public perception of “brand identity” for Jesus and the church (with a very particular, very limited, very white evangelical understanding of “the church”).

This bit from Baer’s piece is ringing a lot of worrisome alarm bells for many readers:

The $100 million for He Gets Us comes from The Servant Christian Foundation, a nonprofit backed by a Christian donor-advised fund called The Signatry. (Both declined to name the donors who helped envision and pay for He Gets Us, who want to remain anonymous.)

Donor-advised funds are popular with evangelical investors who want to make large gifts without setting up their own private foundations. Wealthy clients invest with The Signatry, which will then either manage the money in an investment fund or help them find nonprofits to support. So far, The Signatry has given away over $3 billion from Christian philanthropists.

So it’s the first big post-Citizen’s United, Dark Money evangelistic campaign. Just what the world needs.

Chrissy Stroop tries to follow the money here, chasing down the 990 forms that can tell us, if not who these mystery billionaires are, what else they’ve been funding beside this ad campaign. What that reveals is not encouraging — huge donations to right-wing political efforts that would all seem to exacerbate the very same “image problem” these ads intend to fix:

According to the Signatry’s 2020 form, the most recent available, in 2019 the organization directed over $19 million of funding to Alliance Defending Freedom, an SPLC-designated anti-LGBTQ hate group and the organization that wrote the model legislation on which Mississippi’s draconian new abortion ban was based. Nearly $8 million went to Answers in Genesis, the fundamentalist ministry behind the Creation Museum. Over $1 million is designated for Campus Crusade for Christ (rebranded as “Cru” since 2011). $374,800 went to Al Hayat Ministries, an organization that seeks to “respectfully yet fearlessly unveil the deception of Islam,” and that runs an Arabic-language Christian satellite TV station with the goal of converting Muslims to Christianity.

These are the kinds of billionaires now spending $100 million to fund a re-branding campaign for Jesus.

But please note that, like most billionaires, most of the money they’ll be spending isn’t their own. Whether or not this campaign actually spends anything like $100 million, it doesn’t seem like the “Servant Christian Foundation” or “The Signatry” intends to provide most of the budget here. They’ll control the spending, but much of that spending will come from the tithes and offerings of local churches recruited to support and “participate” in this campaign.

So the billionaires prime the pump with a few million bucks they’ll use to entice local churches to donate tens of millions more (in theory) and that money will, in turn, be “spent” on consultants and ad-buys and ad-buyers in ways that will likely turn out to enrich the billionaires themselves.

The whole thing, in other words, appears to be a fundraising grift based on roughly the model of the Ben Carson For President scam:

Team Carson has been plowing a huge portion of the money it raises back into fundraising, using costly direct-mail and telemarketing tactics. Pretty much every campaign uses those tools, but the extent to which Carson was using it raised eyebrows around politics. First, many of the companies being paid millions and millions of dollars are run by top campaign officials or their friends and relations, meaning those people are making a mint. Second, many of the contributions are coming from small-dollar donors. If that money is being given by well-meaning grassroots conservatives for a campaign that’s designed not to win but to produce revenue for venders, isn’t it just a grift?

These questions have been circling since last summer. If they’re right, the most sympathetic interpretation is that Carson, like his donors, was being taken for a ride by his aides, and wasn’t in on the scam. Carson seemed to suggest as much on Tuesday, implying he was taken advantage of by aides who treated the campaign as an ATM.

I can’t prove that “The Signatry” and the “Servant Christian Foundation” are pure grifts any more than David A. Graham was able to prove that Ben Carson’s campaign managers were running a scam on both the candidate and his donors. But, as Graham pointed out, the intent of that campaign hardly matters when that’s obviously what the effect of it was. The outcome was that donors handed over their money, campaign staffers made a mint, and Carson’s candidacy went nowhere. My guess is that the ultimate outcome of this “$100M ad campaign” will be something very similar to that.

Now please excuse me, as I need to go clock in at the Big Box so that I can tell even more people about the wonderful ways they can benefit from all of our convenient financing options.

Previous Post

March 22, 2022

March 22 Flashback: Rewriting the Bible

Next Post

March 23, 2022 March 23 Flashback: The priority of labor

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "Siloam" mean in Hebrew?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Cleansing Sent Peace Refreshing