Here comes the jackpot question in advance

Last updated on: December 30, 2021 at 3:17 pm by Fred Clark

Here comes the jackpot question in advance 2021-12-30T15:17:21-05:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

• The Dunning Kruger School. Eric Levitz on “The Authoritarian Right’s 1877 Project.”

Shorter version: The white right that rules today’s Republican Party hates the first Reconstruction — the brief spasm of actual constitutional democracy that existed for about a dozen years after the Civil War. The white right also hates the second Reconstruction, i.e., the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s, which led to the brief spasm of actual constitutional democracy that the Roberts Court has been aggressively dismantling ever since.

A 6-to-3 majority of Supreme Court justices wholly disregards the existence of the 15th Amendment. These lawless jurists claim this makes them “conservative,” but it merely makes them Confederate.

• The good news here is that a Methodist church in Boise, Idaho has removed a stained glass window honoring and depicting the traitor Robert E. Lee. The bad news here was that a Methodist church way up north in Boise, Idaho, had a stained glass window celebrating treason in defense of slavery and kept it there, in the sanctuary, until the year of two thousand and twenty one.

Idaho became a state in 1890. It’s statehood was a brazen exercise in partisan politics — an effort to add two more Republican votes in the Senate. This is why we added so many stars to the flag in the years following the Civil War, and it’s why we have two Dakotas even though one would obviously have been sufficient. Adding states in order to gain votes in the Senate was a tactic first embraced by the Radical Republicans — the actual Party of Lincoln — to ensure the ratification and enforcement of the Reconstruction Amendments. By 1890, alas, the Republican Party had mostly abandoned Reconstruction, so the addition of Idaho’s senators didn’t help to make the 15th Amendment any more meaningful in 1890 than it is today.

I happen to believe that the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments to the Constitution are, in fact, constitutional and ought to be enforced whether or not a majority of white senators agrees. So I’m supportive of efforts to revive this traditional tactic, adding two new senators each from Columbia, Puerto Rico, and Birmingham.

N.B.: That RNS piece linked above reports that the stained glass window was “deconsecrated” after it was removed from the Methodist sanctuary, thus suggesting that the Scalzi family church was probably also formally deconsecrated before it was sold to its new owners.

• Niebuhr-blogging: Moral Man and Immoral Society and vaccination mandates. This is John Fea applying a general statement from Niebuhr to a particular context:

It is the responsibility of the federal government, with all its resources and scientific experts, to reduce the impact of COVID-19 on American life. When the vaccine was released, the federal government (led by the CDC) tried to achieve “solidarity by a mutual accommodation of interests.” In other words, the government tried to convince people to take the vaccine. But when their efforts at “social cohesion” failed, and people placed their “liberty” over the common good, mandates became necessary.

Let’s add my other click-bait hobby horse into the mix here — subsidiarity. Yes, “it is the responsibility of the federal government … to convince people to take the vaccine,” but this is not solely or exclusively the responsibility of the federal government. Other agencies and actors — state and local governments, educational institutions, religious institutions, religious congregations, families, neighbors, voluntary associations, media, clubs, teams, guilds, bands, businesses, and all other facets of civil society — all share direct and indirect differentiated responsibility “to reduce the impact of COVID-19 on American life.”

And, like the federal government, all of these actors ought to avoid coercion until, in Niebuhr’s phrase, “efforts to achieve solidarity by a mutual accommodation of interests have been exhausted.” And once those efforts have been exhausted, all those other actors — in all of their various and differentiated direct and indirect capacities — are, just like the federal government, obliged to employ whatever more coercive means they have available.

You are an individual citizen in a nation state. You are also a child or parent, a sibling or cousin, a neighbor, a customer, an employee or employer, a congregant, a member, a fan, a subscriber, a correspondent — a resident of an inescapable network of mutuality. Do what you can, where you can.

• Dennis Quaid was extraordinary in The Rookie, and Zachary Levi was charming in Chuck and Shazam. That might be enough to persuade me to watch the two of them in a Kurt Warner biopic, but not when that movie is billed as “faith friendly” and “inspirational” and comes from the white evangelical world of “Christian cinema.” I trust the cast, but not the writers, directors, and producers. So thanks anyway. (But it is a pretty great story.)

• Congratulations to the “24 inmates awarded BA degree in pastoral ministry [who] will serve NC prisons as ministers.”

I have questions, concerns, and caveats here — many of which are similar to those I have regarding the program that trains brave inmates to become skilled firefighters who save lives and homes in California every year during wildfire season. But none of those concerns qualify my admiration for the men who have pursued the training and mission offered by either program.

• The title of this post comes from this classic Frank Loesser song, “What Are You Doing New Year’s Eve?”

It’s a terrific song that has become a year-end holiday standard and a track that great singers love to include on Christmas albums. That wasn’t what Loesser had in mind. He was thinking of this question being blurted out by someone so love-struck that they were suddenly unable to imagine a future without their beloved. It’s one thing to ask someone to celebrate New Year’s Eve with you in late December. It’s quite a bit more than that if you say this on a first date in June.

In any case, I love this song, but I love it less this week. When you sing “What Are You Doing New Year’s Eve?” on December 30 you seem to be taking the other person for granted in a way that’s almost disrespectful.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

December 28, 2021

'It was just what you did'

Next Post

December 31, 2021 Postcards from the class & culture wars (12.31.21)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was the youngest king of Judah?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Josiah Asa Hezekiah Jehoshaphat