Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
You must remember this

You must remember this

Last updated on: October 14, 2021 at 5:28 pm by Fred Clark

You must remember this 2021-10-14T17:28:13-04:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Here’s an interview with historian Randall Balmer about his new book, Bad Faith: Race and the Rise of the Religious Right.

The story Balmer recounts and documents there is not an exposé revealing secrets never before made public. Nor is it arcana about the distant past unearthed in some musty archive. This was a story that unfolded publicly. It was on television and in all the newspapers. Balmer is a historian, but he is also a white evangelical who is now 66 years old, and so he remembers this story. I’m 53, so I do too.

Everyone our age who lived in that evangelical world during the 1970s and the 1980s remembers this story,* even — and probably especially — those most aggressively pretending they don’t. After all, it takes far more attention and focus to avoid looking at the elephant in the room than it does to acknowledge its presence.

If you can remember this, then you can remember when white evangelicalism had nothing to do with abortion-is-murderism.

That’s a bitter running joke about Randall Balmer’s work on this subject. Angry white Christians who feel compelled to dismiss his formidably documented argument try to label him as an obsessive crank going on about his hobby horse. That’s comical because, yes, he’s written many articles and books on the segregationist/anti-civil-rights roots of the religious right, and he’s lectured on it in classrooms for years, but he’s also written about many other subjects. And he’s free to spend most of his life and most of his time doing other things.

He’s free to have free time, in other words, in exactly the way that those angry white critics are not. Because, again, looking at what’s sitting right there in front of all of us takes far less work than avoiding ever seeing it. Refusing to see it is a full-time job requiring perpetual, constant vigilance 24/7/365. For years. Even once you’ve developed mechanisms and honed the skills and habits of not seeing, you can never let your guard down and relax. You must always be on the lookout for what you’re determined not to look at.

Yonat Shimron summarizes part of what it is that most white evangelicals are refusing to look at and pretending they don’t remember:

Specifically, as Balmer shows, it was government interference in “segregation academies” such as Bob Jones University in Greenville, South Carolina, that launched the religious right. Bob Jones and other schools, such as Jerry Falwell’s Lynchburg Christian Academy, refused to admit Black students. As a result, President Richard Nixon ordered the Internal Revenue Service to deny them tax-exempt status as a charitable institution.

In 1971, the Supreme Court agreed. In Green v. Connally, the court held that racially discriminatory schools are not entitled to a tax exemption. (Bob Jones University had its tax-exempt status revoked in 1976.)

White evangelicals were furious. But they could not organize politically by defending racial segregation. Instead, conservative political activists such as Paul Weyrich and Richard Viguerie landed on opposition to abortion as a more “high-minded defense” for their movement, Balmer writes.

That took a while. As Balmer shows, when the Supreme Court legalized abortion, few white evangelicals had anything bad to say about abortion. Baptists such as W.A. Criswell, the former president of the Southern Baptist Convention and pastor of First Baptist Church in Dallas, applauded the ruling. But by the election of Ronald Reagan in 1980, the strategy began to bear fruit.

I was 12 in 1980 and I remember the unanimous and wildly enthusiastic support for Reagan in that election, shared by everyone at our white fundamentalist church and private school. None of that enthusiasm had anything to do with abortion. It was Cold War Christian nationalism, frustration over the energy crisis and the hostages in Iran, and a dozen different Atwater-esque euphemisms disguising the real reasons that we, as white evangelical Christians, were abruptly joining Jesse Helms and Strom Thurmond as suddenly hyper-partisan Republicans.

And if you’re old enough to remember the 1980s, then you also remember that the ret-conning of our partisan realignment as something due to abortion took the rest of the decade to really catch on. It wasn’t until much later that we developed the “But the Supreme Court!” trump-card excuse (which made no sense at the time with appointments like O’Connor and Souter). And throughout the ’80s, there remained a huge distance between most white evangelicals preferences and rhetoric about abortion and those of groups like Operation Rescue or the American Life League. Their hard line of “it’s murder from the moment of conception” was regarded as lunatic-fringe nuttery by most anti-abortion white evangelicals well into the ’90s.

Randall Balmer remembers this. So do I. That doesn’t make us exceptional because every white evangelical who lived through those years remembers this too. Or they would if they allowed themselves to do so, or if they weren’t sure that others wouldn’t allow it.

“You’re not allowed to remember” is the theme of Ramesh Ponnuru’s National Review column refusing to look at the facts and the documented history and the undeniable record that Randall Balmer collects in his book. Ponnuru squints his eyes shut and jams his fingers in his ears, chanting “Lalala I can’t hear you” and mocking Balmer’s history and living memory as “A Nutty Conspiracy Theory About Pro-Lifers.”

And that is, again, something he wrote for the National Review. I invite Ponnuru, and anyone else who cares to do so, to sift through the archives of that magazine from, say, 1961 through 1981. Make two columns: One for every mention of legal abortion and another for every mention of integration and/or the full legal and civil equality of Black people. Can you guess which will prove to be the larger factor and the greater priority for this key platform of American conservatism?

Let me remind us again of “Christianity and Democracy” — Richard John Neuhas’ 1981 manifesto for the intellectual wing of the still-new religious right:

Here’s the editors of the belligerently conservative journal First Things, describing early 1980s white Christian support for Reagan in 1996: “At that time the Cold War was the dominant fact in international affairs and largely shaped domestic politics.” That’s from the introduction to the journal’s reprinting of its founder’s 1981 manifesto “Christianity and Democracy” on its 15th anniversary. That essay never mentions abortion politics. Or abortion. At all. It argues, rather, that anti-communism ought to be the No. 1 priority for good white Christian voters, and that anything else is a dangerous and irresponsible distraction from that paramount concern.

Nobody indignantly condemned Richard John Neuhaus in 1981 for failing to mention the moral horror white evangelicals were experiencing after years of legal abortion had forced them to confront the new reality of millions of “murdered babies.” Because that moral horror hadn’t yet been conjured up.

In 1981, the framework of the Cold War still provided the emotional reassurance that anti-civil-rights white conservatives desperately needed in order to be able to look at themselves in the mirror. They wanted and needed to imagine themselves as good people and yet they were actively and daily failing the largest and most obvious moral test of their day. The Cold War provided a pretense of binary moral absolutes: Good Guys vs. Bad Guys. And thus all one needed to reassure oneself of one’s own apparent goodness was to stake out a position on the side of the Good Guys. This had been white conservatives’ go-to emotional strategy ever since the 1950s, labeling lunch-counter protesters and Rosa Parks and MLK as “communists” and therefore as the Bad Guys — making us, therefore, the Good Guys and good people.

By 1996, that framework was no longer capable of satisfying our emotional need to imagine ourselves as good. The Cold War was over. Ronald Reagan himself had signed a law making Martin Luther King’s birthday a national holiday. Anti-communism was no longer an effective tool for quieting the gnawing realization that we have not been and are not now the Good Guys in this story.

And so, somewhere in those intervening years, in between 1981 and 1996 — gradually, and then all at once — we switched to a different mechanism for quieting that anxiety and a different pretense allowing us to deceive ourselves into imagining we’re the heroic Good Guys.

I remember this. If you were there, you remember it too, even if your need to preserve your current status within white evangelical churches or institutions won’t allow you to admit that.

* A few years back I wrote about the living memory of this history in a post with the overlong title “The con-game of anti-abortion partisanship that replaced Christianity has been so successful that we forget how recently it was invented.” That included this riff:

This entire construct — this bamboozling shtick — was concocted and created and adopted in my lifetime. It’s a new thing, younger than the Happy Meal. This isn’t ancient history, it’s living memory for Generation X.

It is a curious thing to learn that the highest ethical priority, this supposed bedrock of evangelical ethics and of identity, did not even exist when the first four Ramones albums came out. Or, to put it in friendlier terms for white evangelicals, when the first four Second Chapter of Acts albums came out.

And if you’re old enough to remember those albums, you’re old enough to remember this too. Whether you were singing along to “Rockaway Beach” or to “Mansion Builder,” you remember a time when white evangelicals were not bound by this moral hierarchy, when they would have found it bewildering.

Linking back to that because it’s apt and because it’s a good excuse to share this:

Previous Post

October 11, 2021

Run around the block and see a new show start

Next Post

October 14, 2021 How come I can't see you in my mirror?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What do the "Weeping Prophet" and "Book of Lamentations" refer to?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Jeremiah Daniel Isaiah Ezekiel