The IMDB “Goofs” page for the book of Genesis

Last updated on: September 15, 2021 at 6:43 pm by Fred Clark

The IMDB “Goofs” page for the book of Genesis 2021-09-15T18:43:39-04:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Philip Jenkins writes about “Ed Murrow’s Water Bottle, Or How Not to Use Films in Teaching History.” I like the main thrust of his argument, which is that apart from their stories or subject matter, movies can teach us a lot about the culture and customs of the time in which they were made. Here’s one of his many examples:

The 1970 film M*A*S*H notionally concerns the Korean War, but it tells us nothing whatever about that conflict. It is richly informative about American society, culture, values, and gender attitudes as they existed in 1970, and can serve as a primary source for that topic.

That’s a good point, although neither the movie nor the CBS sitcom of M*A*S*H was ever really about Korea. They were both set in Korea, but they were both about Vietnam. And one of the things they can teach us about American society, culture, and values ca. 1970 to 1983 is that America was unwilling and unable to talk directly about Vietnam. In other words, in Jenkins’ terms, neither M*A*S*H is a reliable contemporary primary source for learning about the Korean War, but both are excellent contemporary primary sources for learning about Americans’ attempts to come to grips with the Vietnam War.

Jenkins’ title comes from a flub in George Clooney’s 2005 film Good Night, and Good Luck, which was set in 1953:

A careful viewer would note a scene in an office where you see a water bottle sitting on a desk, in a way that water bottles did not in 1953, any more than did Macbooks or Starbucks cups. The interesting thing is not that somebody left the bottle there, but that nobody else noticed it was odd, or anachronistic. They assumed that what was normal today was normal back in that earlier era. We see things as we expect them to be, according to our own familiar realities. And whether we recognize it or not, those realities change over time. Put another way, we see things not as they are, but as we are.

That’s not the only anachronism in Clooney’s film — IMDB lists several more on the “Goofs” page for the movie involving telephones, military uniforms, typefaces, a Knicks game, and a Moscow “hotline,” among other things. Of course, neither Jenkins nor the nitpickers compiling those goofs for IMDB are suggesting that such minor details make Good Night, and Good Luck a bad film. It’s a terrific film, well deserving of the six Academy Award nominations it received (including for its art director and set director). And David Strathairn is so, so good in it.

An anachronistic map from “Raiders of the Lost Ark” — showing both “Thailand” and “Sri Lanka” — raises questions about the historicity of Indiana Jones. Maybe it’s not that kind of story?

Anyway, for a much older example of precisely the kind of anachronistic blindness Jenkins is getting at, consider Abraham’s camels in the book of Genesis. Abraham was a wealthy, prosperous man, Genesis tells us, and thus he had a lot of camels. Those camels even play a big role in the lovely story of Rebekah at the well in Genesis 24.

The problem here is that the story of Abraham is set in the second millennium BCE — more than a thousand years before domesticated camels were introduced in the Holy Land. Oops.

This is a useful anachronism. We don’t have an IMDB for ancient texts where we can look up the publication or release date for the book of Genesis, but it’s anachronisms help us try to figure that out. The unremarkable presence of domesticated camels suggests that the story of Abraham was written much, much later than the time in which it is set — that it was written sometime long enough after the 9th-century BCE introduction of camels that their presence in the story would be, for the writers and compilers, “things as we expect them to be, according to our own familiar realities.”

This anachronism is one data point among many confirming this much later date of composition for the book of Genesis. If there were an IMDB “Goofs” page for Genesis, the anachronisms section would be very long indeed.

The book of Genesis, in other words, is not a reliable contemporary primary source for learning about the ancient age of the patriarchs. It is, for that, at best a far-removed secondary source compiled long after the events it describes by people with few resources available to them. That does not definitively rule out the possibility that Abraham and Isaac were historical figures, but it does mean that the text of Genesis is, on its own, incapable of supporting the claim that they were.

But what this also means is that the book of Genesis is useful as a primary contemporary source of the time in which it was written. Like M*A*S*H, which is mostly useless for learning about Korea but richly rewarding for learning about Vietnam, the book of Genesis is a valuable artifact of its own time, if not of the time of its notional setting.

Jenkins’ discussion has me thinking not only of the Bible itself, but of “biblical” films. Cecil B. DeMille’s sandal-epic The Ten Commandments is a terrible introduction to the biblical story of the Exodus, but it is a useful artifact of 1953 America which may have as much to teach us about the culture of that time as Good Night, and Good Luck does. This has nothing to do with the anachronistic safety pins, zippers, and tire tracks scrupulously compiled by the nitpickers of the movie’s IMDB “Goofs” page (none of which kept its costume and set designers from Oscar nominations either). But DeMille’s campy spectacular can teach us a lot about white popular theology in mid-20th century America.

It’s not that I want to recommend watching this movie — it hasn’t held up nearly as well as Clooney’s film. My main reaction to The Ten Commandments is to turn it off once Yul Brynner shows up and to switch over to The Magnificent Seven — if you’re gonna give me Yul Brynner, then give me Yul Brynner.

But if you’re into empire criticism or interested in (or reflexively opposed to) liberationist theologies, The Ten Commandments has a lot to show us about what a non-liberationist reading of Exodus looks like. It has something to teach us, I think, about both the style and the substance of Billy Graham’s preaching in the early 1950s. And if you’re watching that movie in 2021, you may find yourself thinking of recent books by Kristin Kobes Du Mez, Anthea Butler, Jemar Tisby, Samuel Perry and Andrew Whitehead, Robert Jones, etc., and thinking, “Yep. They’re right.”

Uncategorized

Bible

history

Previous Post

September 14, 2021

and what i want to know is how do you like your blue-eyed boy Mister Death

Next Post

September 16, 2021 'The redeeming effects of the Christian worldview'

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What city’s walls fell after the Israelites marched around them?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Nineveh Jericho Babylon Jerusalem