Reckoning of the fables

Last updated on: August 5, 2021 at 6:59 pm by Fred Clark

Reckoning of the fables 2021-08-05T18:59:45-04:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Rebecca Onion on “The Fable of the Sick Anti-Vaxxer.” This is a helpful and timely discussion of the kind of approaches and stories that effectively persuade the unpersuaded, and of how and why that’s not always the same kind of approaches/stories that the already persuaded imagine will be effective.

It is, in other words, something for every would-be evangelist or missionary to read and consider.

The “Fable of the Sick Anti-Vaxxer” is often a true story — a personal testimony of regret and repentance. “I once was lost, but now am found,” etc. Such stories can be compelling, but they lose their capacity for persuasion when they’re embellished with triumphalism or schadenfreude. Onion cites a folklorist who notes the way theses stories tend to be told and retold less to persuade others than as a way to “cement the in-group of the vaccinated.” Another scholar describes this as a tool for “choice-supportive bias/post-purchase rationalization.”

It’s often employed, in other words, like those religious urban legends about the supposed death-bed conversions of infamous infidels. This in-group high-fiving and trash-talking offers a temporary morale boost for the in-group, but it’s off-putting to everyone else. And it makes even the truest of true stories seem less trustworthy and less convincing. When the in-group deploys real testimonies this way, it makes them seem as dubious as the fundamentalist preacher reassuring his flock that, with his dying breath, Charles Darwin declared that the fundies were right about everything and that he wanted everyone to burn his books and go buy tickets to the Ark Encounter.

The dynamic here — the way that in-group expressions of “choice-supportive bias” prevent and prohibit persuasion of outsiders — will be familiar to anyone who’s participated in certain forms of door-to-door or street evangelism. I’m thinking here of things like “Evangelism Explosion,” or the Fuller-Brush tactics of some Jehovah’s Witnesses, or those unfortunate kids who sign up to be door-knocking fundraisers for PIRG. You can only attempt such approaches for a short while before you begin to realize that their long-shot futility is a feature, not a bug. They’re not designed to bring others into the fold, but to cement and reaffirm your position as a right and righteous insider.

Upon realizing that, of course, you come to a crossroads. You have to decide what is more important to you: Your status as an insider? Or effectively persuading outsiders of what you regard as an urgently necessary truth? Allowing the former to eclipse the latter changes both the meaning of that insider status and the meaning of that urgently necessary truth — the meaning of whatever gospel of salvation it is that you’re promoting.

In-group exercises in “choice-supportive bias,” in other words, can wind up emphasizing opposition to outsiders and can nurture an obsessive concern with boundaries, distinctiveness and separateness and a sense of superiority — all the things that make connection and communication and persuasion all but impossible. (And at the same time, they change the character of in-group members into something less winsome and compelling — something more sulking and self-absorbed, like Jonah or the older brother in Jesus’ version of that story.)

Strengthening in-group bonds has its place, of course, but while “We few, we happy few” was a a great way to fire up his troops to defeat the French in battle, it would have failed miserably if the aim had been to persuade the French.

“Win over” can mean two very different things, but it cannot usually mean them both at the same time.

You can run a very successful marketing campaign based on just the kind of in-group flattery we’re talking about here. Lots of people have made lots of money by carving out a niche as the providers of elite, exclusive, superior and refined products catering to a sub-set of consumers who have the means to indulge in things that will reaffirm their sense of themselves as elite, exclusive, superior and refined.

But that’s why I’m talking about missiology rather than marketing. In missiology, you never want to carve out a niche or skim off a sub-set. You are, by definition, trying to reach everybody because you believe that everybody needs to hear this. This doesn’t mean that every iteration of your message needs to have universal appeal, but it does mean that it should never be exclusive or based on schadenfreude or triumphalistic mockery of others left holding their manhoods cheap, etc.

That’s one reason that vaccination campaigns need to be more like missiology than like marketing. Another reason is that vaccination campaigns aren’t selling something, they’re trying to give something away for free. That can be just as challenging and sometimes even more difficult.

Onion gives the almost-last word to Jonathan Berman, author of Anti-Vaxxers: How to Challenge a Misinformed Movement:

In his book, Berman categorizes anti-anti-vaccination persuasion tactics in three ways: “reactive” (think mean-spirited arguments with anti-vaxxers); “information-deficit” (dumping info on people); and “community-based” (tactics that demonstrate that other people around anti-vaxxers are vaccinating, “taking into consideration their self-identity and values”). These lessons, taken from research done around vaccination drives conducted in service of childhood vaccines, may or may not translate to our current situation. But I think it’s clear that these new fables will only be as useful as we let them. It’s difficult to be kind, when our fragile hopes for some post-pandemic normalcy seem to be falling apart due to other people’s refusal to get vaccinated. But the Fable of the Sick Anti-Vaxxer — a story aimed at the hesitant, from somebody who once thought as they did — may work best when we, the vaccinated, just let it sit, and resist the temptation to gloat.

Berman’s three categories make it clear which approach he prefers as the only one likely to be effective at persuading the unpersuaded. I’ve not read more of his argument than what Onion provides here, but I appreciate the cautious phrasing of “taking into consideration their self-identity and values.” These things must be considered and acknowledged and accounted for. We cannot hope to be heard by anyone, let alone to persuade them, if we don’t bother to figure out who they are and where they’re coming from. We can’t expect them to listen to our stories unless we’re willing to listen to their stories.

But that doesn’t mean that all stories are the same. Some fables are true. Some are not.

Part of “taking into consideration their self-identity and values” includes considering the possibilities that those things may literally be what’s killing them. And when that’s the case, our task is not to reaffirm or to cater to that sense of identity or those values, but to find ways to question them that may convince them to join in that questioning.

This, too, is another difference between missiology and marketing. Marketing is all about identifying and indulging a potential consumer’s identity and values. Missiology is often about challenging them. Sometimes the thing that most needs to be said is this: “Your self-identity and values? They’re killing you. So, yeah, those are gonna have to go.” Or, in other words, “You need a fresh start, a do-over. Ye must be born again.” Olly olly oxen free, etc.

Previous Post

August 4, 2021

Vaxx and facts

Next Post

August 9, 2021 Second helpings at the Applebee's salad bar

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was the mother of John the Baptist?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Deborah Hannah Mary Elizabeth