Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
School-boards, mission boards, and the SBC

School-boards, mission boards, and the SBC

Last updated on: June 21, 2021 at 6:04 pm by Fred Clark

School-boards, mission boards, and the SBC 2021-06-21T18:04:18-04:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The SBC is the Southern Baptist Convention, not the Southern Baptist Church. That’s an important distinction for anyone trying to make sense of recent developments in America’s largest Protestant denomination.

Take that phrase, for example, “largest … denomination.” Southern Baptists love to talk about the “largest” part. That’s a point of pride for them, something they regard as evidence of God’s blessing in contrast with the shrinking mainline Protestant denominations. But the word “denomination” doesn’t sit well with them. That’s not how Baptists are organized — to the extent it’s ever possible to describe Baptists as “organized.”

Baptists have “conventions” or “associations.” Mostly autonomous local congregations choose to work together for some common purposes — many of which require formal institutional structures — but it’s all a kind of nonbinding democracy. There’s no monolithic institution, no hierarchy, and no “headquarters.”

That was a forbidden word when I worked at the national offices of the American Baptist Convention in Valley Forge. We were never, ever, permitted to think of ourselves, let alone refer to ourselves, as being the ABC “headquarters.” We were employees hired by and working for the associating congregations of the “denomination,” not elders or bishops. That included the office of the ABC’s “president” — an executive who was elected by the congregations’ representatives to oversee their cooperative efforts, not to oversee them.

The main denominational functions of these Not Headquarters Baptist structures are their various “mission boards.” These date back to the early 1800s when Baptist congregations began joining together to commission and support missionaries — a task that could be done far more effectively and efficiently through formal cooperative structures than by autonomous congregations working separately. The work of those mission boards led to further forms of institutionalized cooperation — such as publishing houses for Sunday school curriculums, seminaries for training clergy, hospitals, nursing homes, and pension boards to handle the sometimes tricky financial aspects of compensation for ministers and missionaries.

These various “mission boards” are also literally “boards” in that they’re all overseen by boards of trustees or directors who are either directly elected by representatives of the associated congregations or appointed by the pseudo-denominational executives they elected. They’re designed and intended to be practical and task-oriented.

Think of your local public school board. That’s an elected office, but it wasn’t designed or intended to be a partisan or a political office. The job is just to ensure that schools are staffed and equipped to fulfill the task of educating the children of the community. The role of a school board member is to be scrupulously competent, not ideological. The only ideology that a school board requires, or can accommodate, is a commitment to quality public education.

That’s an oversimplification, of course, since everyone’s understanding of what “a commitment to quality public education” means is inherently tangled up with ideology. Nothing is ever wholly “a-political.”

But the plague of “politicized” school boards involves more than that. It’s the trend of turning school boards into something other than school boards — into proxies or additional fronts for the partisan political struggles of our national politics — eclipsing the primary purpose and function those boards were designed and intended to serve. We now have school boards that include elected members who are indifferent toward or even opposed to the steady, capable function of our schools — who view the idea of ensuring “quality public education” with hostility.

These anti-school school-board members didn’t seek election to keep the schools running well, they sought election in pursuit of the power they hoped would help them achieve some (mostly) unrelated political goal.

I think that’s helpful for understanding the so-called “conservative resurgence” that transformed the SBC in the early 1990s and the aftershocks of that which shaped its annual meeting last week in Nashville.

The biggest news out of that meeting was the three-way election to selection the convention’s next president. One candidate for the position was Al Mohler, who helped to lead that “conservative resurgence” and orchestrated a purge of all non-fundamentalists at Southern Baptist seminary in Louisville. Another candidate was Georgia pastor Mike Stone, representing a faction of fundies who believe that Mohler has gotten soft and now merits purging himself. And the third candidate was Alabama pastor Ed Litton, who ultimately won the run-off against Stone by a narrow margin.

Several outlets described the new president as a “moderate,” apparently because in contrast with guys like Mohler and Stone, anyone might appear relatively moderate. But there were no “moderates” — theologically or politically — on the ballot. As Greg Thornbury put it:

I know Ed, I’ve met Ed. Ed is a super-conservative guy, but The New York Times called him a moderate.

I mean, compared to what? Idi Amin? The SBC is already so far to the right that anybody who says anything in general about unity or love or kindness is viewed as a compromiser.

Or as Jacob Lupfer wrote: “Thinking [Litton] is anything other than a strident theological conservative reveals just how dramatically to the right the goalposts keep shifting.”

Veteran SBC-beat journalist Bob Smietana agrees:

Litton described himself as both theologically and politically conservative. Like Stone, Mohler and other candidates, he is an inerrantist and a complementarian — believing the Bible is without error and that men and women have different roles in the church and family.

Some critics of Litton have referred to him as “moderate” or liberal. The term “moderate” was used during the Southern Baptist conflicts over the Bible and theology of the 1980s and 1990s to refer to those who opposed inerrantists and other conservatives. …

The current debates among Southern Baptists are among varying conservative camps.

Like Mike Stone and Al Mohler, and like anyone else who had any chance of becoming the SBC’s next president, Ed Litton is extremely conservative politically and extremely fundamentalist theologically (which is really more modernist than “conservative,” because the left-right thing doesn’t track for theology, but fundies think of themselves as ultra-conservatives so in that sense that’s what he is).

When people refer to Litton as a “moderate,” then, they mean it in the sense that people like David French or John Kasich are now sometimes described as a “moderates.” It’s not about his political ideology or his theology, but about his respect for the role and function of institutions in opposition to the bull-in-a-china-shop lawlessness of someone like Donald Trump or Paige Patterson.

The choice between Stone and Litton was not a choice between “conservative” and “moderate,” or even a choice between “ultra-conservative” and “conservative.” It was a choice between the faction that views all institutions as mere tools for the will-to-power and the faction that respects the actual purpose and function of those institutions. Stone and Mohler, like Trump and Patterson, look at the various Southern Baptist mission boards and view them primarily as levers for power — seats that can be stocked with loyal foot-soldiers who will ignore their intended functions and use those positions to consolidate and concentrate authoritarian power.

Litton thus became the preferred candidate for SBC congregations who want those institutions to do what they were intended to do — to send missionaries, publish Sunday school materials, secure pensions for clergy, etc. And he became the preferred candidate who want the SBC to remain a “convention” and not a hierarchical denomination complete with a magisterium and a pope.

That’s the split here and the choice that Litton’s too-close-for-comfort election represented. Once you understand how the Paige Patterson faction of the SBC views institutions and power, you will appreciate that Thornbury’s “Idi Amin” line wasn’t quite as hyperbolic as it seemed.

evangelicals

SBC

Previous Post

June 18, 2021

Don't give yourself away

Next Post

June 23, 2021 And the funny thing is it has no end

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How many books are in the New Testament?

Select your answer to see how you score.

21 27 39 24