Yes that’s the book for me

Last updated on: May 18, 2021 at 6:27 pm by Fred Clark

Yes that’s the book for me 2021-05-18T18:27:40-04:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

• I’m a big fan of Joel Duff’s delightful blog “Naturalis Historia,” where he deconstructs young-Earth creationist arguments with detailed patience. But somehow I’d missed this piece from a few years back: “Reclaiming the Biblical Authority of Joseph’s Global Famine.”

It’s a fun piece of parody built on an Answers in Genesis’ piece “Reclaiming the Biblical Authority of Noah’s Global Flood.” Duff’s point — reinforced by his over-the-top “research” of actual supposed “evidence” — is that the famine in the story of Joseph at the end of the book of Genesis is described in the same language as the flood in Noah’s story at the beginning of that book. It was a famine “over all the land” and “over all the earth.” So why do the creationists insist on treating that description as “literal” for the flood but not for the famine?

Duff’s post is good stuff, but since it centers on the story of Joseph, I’m obliged to point out, yet again, that Joseph was not a Good Guy. See: “Joseph and the Appalling Tyrannical Despot.”

And since we’ve mentioned the story of Noah, here’s Paul Davidson on “Noah’s Flood: Competing Visions of a Mesopotamian Tradition.” The Gilgamesh Epic, he argues, only really makes sense in its original polytheistic context. The attempt(s) to retell it in a monotheistic setting gets rid of the whole argument between the gods and thus makes the flood seem, well, pointless.

• The link to that old post of Duff’s comes via Perfect Number, who also shares some thoughtful thoughts about introducing a toddler to the Bible:

There is a lot of good stuff in the Bible. There are a lot of very good and beautiful truths about God. There are a lot of stories that are great for kids to read. BUT. Most of the Bible is not that. So yes, I want to show my child the good parts, but I don’t want to misrepresent the Bible and have him think that the Bible is all about exciting stories, and teaching morality and godliness, and learning good things about God. No, the Bible is very much about foreskins, and genocide, and God sending war and disasters as punishment, and laws that had zero understanding of human rights.

It’s not a G-rated book, after all. Or, to put it in terms my evangelical kin would appreciate, if it’s truly “sharper than any two-edged sword,” then we should be careful about letting little kids play with it.

And we should also be very careful about letting adults play with it. Or, as Prof. Hamori puts it here, it’s “not a matter of accepting or rejecting the Bible wholesale. It’s a matter of figuring out what you think the value of the Bible is. It’s a rich collection of voices, and readers aren’t required to get on board with all of them.”

• Along the lines of this theme, here’s a polite, gentle rebuke to bonkers “Bible prophecy” folklore masquerading as legitimate biblical interpretation: “No, the COVID-19 vaccine is not linked to the mark of the beast – but a first-century Roman tyrant probably is.”

Will this kind of cordial, matter-of-fact presentation of conventional orthodoxy reach or persuade those whose “End Times theology” is shaped by Left Behind and The Omen? Probably not. But it’s good to put it out there every once in a while, just for the record.

Plus, it asks less of those folks than suggesting that they read a 10-year blog series reviewing the World’s Worst Books.

Sometimes, though, if I’m in a perverse mood, I’ll just ask “The mark of which beast?” And then start going through Revelation 13 with them to see if we can parse whether it’s the mark of the first beast or of the second beast, which “exerciseth all the power of the first beast before him, and causeth the earth and them which dwell therein to worship the first beast.” (“I don’t know.” … “Third beast.”)

• Speaking of first-century Roman emperors, here’s a fascinating story that has nothing to do with the Bible directly, but which ought to have a lot to do with, for example, how we should understand Romans 13: “Tiberius, Imperial Detective.”

This is excerpted from Emma Southon’s book A Fatal Thing Happened on the Way to the Forum: Murder in Ancient Rome. A taste:

This is, I believe, the only time in recorded Roman history that an emperor decided to investigate a murder by examining the scene of the crime. These things just didn’t happen in Rome because they didn’t have the same ideas about evidence and crimes that we have. Their murder trials didn’t involve people looking at daggers or gloves or other bits of physical evidence. They just involved people reciting really good speeches at each other, each using the same rhetorical strategies, mostly about the character of the defendant and/or victim and their general demeanor in life rather than the actual events of the case in question, until the jury or judge picked whichever person they liked best. Examining a crime scene wasn’t a particularly important part of that process. Tiberius going off to have a look at the window from which Apronia fell was therefore very surprising. So surprising, in fact, that Silvanus hadn’t even bothered trying to tidy up after the murder had been committed.

“The past is a foreign country …” And the Bible is a bunch of very, very old books.

Previous Post

May 17, 2021

A teeth, taxes, Toyota trifecta

Next Post

May 19, 2021 'And the shame, the shame was on the other side ...'

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not ____ it.

Select your answer to see how you score.

Comprehended Accepted Extinguished Understood