Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
The unholy trinity of Bell, Pew, and Henry

The unholy trinity of Bell, Pew, and Henry

Last updated on: March 27, 2021 at 6:18 pm by Fred Clark

The unholy trinity of Bell, Pew, and Henry 2021-03-27T18:18:53-04:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I’m cautious about praising or drawing attention to the many Good Things I come across from within mainstream institutional American evangelicalism. Praise for such Good Things sometimes prompts a perverse response from gatekeepers, the donor class, and other institutional powers that be — particularly when that praise comes from the wrong people. And because of that perverse response, any expression of praise or commendation or gratitude can wind up having the effect of discouraging the very thing one is trying to encourage.

So there’s a tricky business here, trying to draw people’s attention to worthy things while avoiding the attention of the perverse powers that be. You can help a campfire catch by blowing on it, but you can also extinguish a candle by blowing it out. The impulse to shout an “Amen!” to a worthy message may wind up prompting the backlash that sees that message silenced and strangled and suppressed.

And it’s not just the message one needs to worry about. Incautious praise that rouses the perverse powers can also endanger the messengers. That means real people, their real lives and livelihoods may be at stake.

Let me give a couple of examples, case studies of this pattern and dynamic involving two institutional pillars of white evangelicalism in America: InterVarsity Christian Fellowship and Wheaton College.

Urbana 15 — InterVarsity’s massive missions conference — featured a remarkable, powerful, prophetic sermon from Michele Higgins followed by an enthusiastic “Amen” and altar call led by worship leader Erna Hackett. The response from the 16,000 white evangelicals in attendance at Urbana was overwhelmingly positive — bearing witness to their having experienced something true and Spirit-filled. I was cheered and encouraged to see that and I wanted to respond with cheers and encouragement for that, but before I was able to figure out how to do so, it was already too late.

The widespread praise and admiration and hopeful excitement generated by Higgins’ sermon and the audience’s receptive response had already triggered a vigorously reactionary reaction from TPTB and the backlash was already in full swing. As I wrote just a few days after Urbana 15, “InterVarsity takes a firehose to Pentecost in a rush to quench the spirit“:

Higgins’ prophetic words on that stage, for that audience, seemed to be, as Tobin Grant described it, “a watershed moment in American evangelicalism.”

I watched that sermon. Twice. Seeing such a “watershed moment” unfolding, I chided myself for being overly cynical.

But then I remembered the pattern. It never allows you to forget about it for long.

And it didn’t take long, at all, for the pattern to reappear and reassert itself. It didn’t take long for me to realize, yet again, that whenever I worry that I’m being overly cynical about white evangelicalism, I’m probably still not being cynical enough.

Michelle Higgins stood in the pulpit at Urbana and said that white evangelicalism was committing spiritual adultery with the false god of white supremacy. She called on white evangelical Christians to repent and be born again — to tear down that false idol and get busy where God is busy, in the movement for justice.

But that’s not what InterVarsity is now saying happened there at Urbana. If you go to InterVarsity’s website, you’ll see that the backpedaling, qualifying and retracting of this prophetic moment has already begun in earnest.

A Very Good Thing happened at Urbana 15 and, as soon as that Very Good Thing drew attention and praise, TPTB at InterVarsity rescinded and retracted and apologized for it, promising never to allow anything of the sort to ever happen again. (A promise that, happily, TPTB are not powerful enough to keep.)

Orlando J.B. Bloom

I was kicking myself for not “remembering the pattern” in that post because of what had happened just prior to that at Wheaton College. A few weeks earlier I had written in praise of a fine statement produced and endorsed by students of that evangelical school who were criticizing the gun-toting, Muslim-hating Christian nationalism of Jerry Falwell Jr. — “Roll Thunder: Well done, Wheaton students.”

The donor class and other institutional Powers That Be at Wheaton were not at all pleased to see their students saying such things about an upstanding devout leader like Jerry Jr. If the students’ statement had only circulated on campus, TPTB might have found it sufficient merely to clamp down on the student paper or to threaten student government funding or some such other proportional response. But because the student statement got picked up in the press, becoming a minor national story that was earning cheers from all the wrong sorts of people, TPTB opted for a more severe form of backlash by making an example of a “tenured” faculty member. (Tenured is in ironic quotes there because, as it turns out, “tenure” protections do not actually apply to non-white, non-male faculty at Wheaton when TPTB are displeased.)

Ironically, the same folks who react with such perverse ferocity to any praise of white evangelical institutions from the wrong sorts of people will turn around and complain that those of us they consider the wrong sorts of people are “always critical” and “negative” about those institutions. They’ll get wind of a post like this one and chalk it up to “Oh, that guy is always bashing Wheaton and InterVarsity — he never has anything good to say about them.”

But all that shows is that we’ve tried to learn the lesson they’ve been emphatically teaching us. If we have something good to say about a sermon at Urbana, they respond with an apology for and a retraction of that sermon. If we have something good to say about Wheaton students, they respond by firing Dr. Hawkins for quoting Miroslav Volf. We’ve been taught that no good word will go unpunished, and that those punishments will be swift and severe. We’ve been taught never to praise any of the many Good Things that happen thanks to many of the good people at these institutions lest there be dire consequences for those very same good people. We’ve seen them shoot their hostages before and we know they’ll do it again if provoked.

I should be more specific about the identity of those “Powers That Be.” Who is it that Paul’s phrase describes here? The same three groups who have played this role in white evangelical institutions since before I was born. Not bell, book, and candle, but Bell, Pew, and Henry.

Here, again, is the tragedy of Frank Gaebelein at Selma, as summarized in Peter G. Heltzel’s Jesus and Justice:

In 1965 [Carl] Henry sent Frank E. Gaebelein to cover the march in Selma, Alabama. An associate editor of Christianity Today and the founder and headmaster of the Stony Brook School, New York, Gaebelein went to Selma and was so inspired that he wired Henry in Washington, DC, that [white] evangelicals needed to join the march. But Gaebelein’s stories of the Selma march never saw the light of day. The resistance at Christianity Today was coming primarily from two people: J. Howard Pew, the Texas oil man and the financer of Christianity Today, and L. Nelson Bell, Billy Graham’s father-in-law and an editorial adviser at Christianity Today, who still had segregationist views. Pew and Bell did not want Christianity Today to speak out too critically against racism and capitalism, because they thought it would alienate important segments of the magazine’s constituency.

Bell, Pew, and Henry. The segregationists, the Mammonists, and the administrators who capitulate to their desires. Always those three, working together to quench the Spirit and to put a halt to any tiny steps in the direction of justice. Today, as in 1965 or in 1865, these are the gatekeepers of white evangelicalism, TPTB who cast out and “controversialize” any voices they deem to be threats from within white evangelicalism and who work to silence even those voices outside of it with their hostage-taking. (“Meddle in our affairs by praising those we fear and we will make them jobless and homeless. They will be Ciziked and Hawkinsed and Throckmortoned into exile without severance and you meddling outsiders will be responsible for their fate!”)

Heltzel’s final sentence in the paragraph above doesn’t quite convey the whole truth about either the why or the how of Pew and Bell’s influence on Henry. He wrote: “Pew and Bell did not want Christianity Today to speak out too critically against racism and capitalism, because they thought it would alienate important segments of the magazine’s constituency.” But this wasn’t merely a prediction. It was a threat.

The racist and the Mammonist were guaranteeing that any support for the Civil Rights Movement “would alienate important segments of the magazine’s constituency” because they would actively promote and generate that alienation. They were informing Henry that they would use all of their influence and money to turn his constituency against him. He would be deluged with angry letters from former supporters and with cancellations of subscriptions by pastors who would denounce CT to their flocks and anathematize it in their congregations.

This is the same threat that the 21st-century Bells and Pews make against the administrators they’ve conditionally and provisionally allowed to run white evangelical institutions today. If a college administrator “allows” the students of that college to criticize a Club Member like Jerry Jr., or if some professor unnerves them by demonstrating solidarity with oppressed groups, then they warn that administrator that this might “alienate important segments of the institution’s constituency.” Meaning, in other words, that they would employ all their resources to generate fear, disgust, angry letters and revocations of support from every potential donor or the parents of every prospective student that they were capable of turning against the institution. Meaning, in other words, “Nice college you’ve got here. It’d be a shame if something happened to it.”

This form of raw power — the networks of media and direct-mail Scary Story fundraising outfits also controlled by these same Bells and Pews — enables them to threaten and exert control over even those white evangelical institutions they do not directly support with their imprimaturs and large donations. It’s not just the threat of withholding their direct support, but also the threat of directing attacks.

All of which is why I can enthusiastically recommend that video I posted yesterday because it includes the wisdom and insights of Dr. Korie Edwards from Ohio State and of Dr. Robert Chao Romero from UCLA.

And it’s why I’ll also whisper, quietly, that the other three panelists, brilliant folks who don’t work for big state universities, are also very much worth listening to here. They’re incisive, righteous voices with urgently important good news, and their work is a great credit to their respective institutions. But I’ll refrain from mentioning them by name and from naming those institutions, just in case Bell and Pew and Henry are listening.

P.S. I used to post pictures of the 19th-century abolitionist Jonathan Blanchard to accompany discussions of Wheaton College as a reminder of that school’s radical roots and its social justice warrior founder. At some point I switched to using pictures of his namesake — actor Orlando Jonathan Blanchard Bloom — because, well, he’s just so much prettier. And yes, that’s really his name because his family were the kind of people who named their children after 19th-century abolitionists and 16th-century composers, which is pretty cool.

P.P.S. I made it all the way through this discussion of the vindictiveness of white evangelical gatekeepers without ever once making any sardonic comments about how these same vindictive jerks are now pretending to be horrified by the bogeyman of “cancel culture.” I think my restraint there is commendable.

evangelicals

gatekeepers

Previous Post

March 26, 2021

Smart people saying smart things (3.26.21)

Next Post

March 30, 2021 Postcards from the class & culture wars (3.30.21)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: Samson's strength came from his long hair.

Select your answer to see how you score.

TRUE FALSE