Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
Moral panics are not moral crusades

Moral panics are not moral crusades

Last updated on: March 3, 2021 at 7:00 am by Fred Clark

Moral panics are not moral crusades 2021-03-02T17:52:04-05:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Lest we should see where we are,

Lost in a haunted wood,
Children afraid of the night
Who have never been happy or good.
— W.H. Auden, “September 1, 1939“

Here are two sentences, written back-to-back in a way that is intended to be reassuring. I would suggest that these two sentences, back-to-back, cannot be read in any way that is reassuring:

They want wrongs to be righted and they want justice to be done. But eventually, they will move on.

This is from historian Daniel Gulotta’s piece at the Bulwark, comparing “QAnon and the Satanic Panics of Yesteryear.”

It’s a workmanlike overview of the last high-water mark of the (never ending) Satanic Panic, framed with a general theme of Don’t worry too much — we’ve survived this before and we’ll survive it again. Hence that reassurance that “Eventually, they will move on.”

Except, again, that sentence follows one insisting that moral panics are motivated by a genuine desire for “justice” — “They want wrongs to be righted and they want justice to be done.” Moving on from that would seem like a bad thing — like a dispiriting surrender that no longer wants wrongs to be righted or justice to be done.

I don’t think that’s what Gulotta intended to say about those who “move on” after moral panics, but I think it’s actually closer to the truth than the rest of the paragraph in which these two strangely juxtaposed sentences appear.

Here’s that paragraph in full, which conveys the essence of what I think Gulotta gets wrong here:

Third, we have reason to hope that QAnon will eventually spend itself out. If the Satanic panics of the past can teach us anything, it is that many of these individuals — including many whose beliefs are bizarre or seem like they must be ironic — are sincere in their convictions and mean well. They want wrongs to be righted and they want justice to be done. But eventually, they will move on. We don’t know when that will be; it’s entirely possible that the climax of QAnon already came on January 6, or perhaps the movement will linger on for years in ever-shifting forms. But Satanic panics tend eventually to peter out, and to be looked back upon with some mix of shame and horror.

This comes at the end of Gulotta’s essay, which includes a lengthy discussion of the very long history of earlier variations of Satanic Panics. He — correctly — links the hysteria of the 1980s-’90s to:

A well-established pattern of Christian theology concerning conspiracies dating back to the medieval church and the witch hunts of the early modern era. The fear that children are being morally corrupted, sexually abused, and physically harmed is one of the most recognizable Satanic conspiracy tropes. In the witch trials of early modern Europe, accusations of killing infants and harming young children were common. For centuries, Jews throughout the Holy Roman Empire and Reformation Europe were accused of ritually murdering Christian children for magical purposes and cannibalism. Under stress and torture, both men and women — but mostly women — confessed to such Satanic crimes as using babies’ blood for spells, murdering children at witches’ sabbaths, and having sex with the devil.

… America’s most infamous witch hunt had its origin in the fear of Satanic harm befalling children. Beginning in 1692, Salem minister Samuel Parris and his wife Elizabeth were alarmed at their daughter Betty and niece Abigail’s declining health. The Reverend John Hale suspected a Satanic attack: “These Children were bitten and pinched by invisible agents.” Believing them bewitched, fears of a Satanic conspiracy against the colony took hold — ultimately costing twenty lives.

I do not think we can look at centuries of pogroms, massacres, and ethnic-cleansing of Jews, or at the witch hunts of New England or of Europe in the early modern era and truthfully say that those who carried them out were “sincere in their convictions and [meant] well.” Nor do I think we can say that they were motivated by a desire to see wrongs righted and justice done.

This is why spikes in the ongoing Satanic Panic, in all its historical forms, are not described as moral crusades, but as moral panics. The driving factor is panic — fear. Specifically, moral panics are driven by the fear that wrongs will be righted and that justice will be done. And where we gonna run to, oh, on that day?

The clearest illustration of this was an outbreak of Satanic Panic a generation after the Salem witch trials, one which lasted longer and was far deadlier and more gruesome in its toll: the New York Conspiracy Panic of 1741. The purported cause of this panic was a massive Jesuit conspiracy to lead New York City’s 2,000 enslaved persons in a revolt. There was never any evidence that such a conspiracy or revolt was really being planned, but mass hysteria seized white New Yorkers nonetheless because they all knew, with utter clarity and certainty, that a lethal slave revolt was what they deserved — what they had earned and what justice itself demanded if the most evident wrongs in their city were to be righted.

Moral panics are not sparked by sincere, well-meaning convictions of those who wish to see wrongs righted and justice done. They are sparked by the sincere, inescapable conviction that, in the words of the prophet Amos, the day of justice would be, for them, darkness and not light. The recognition that justice would not mean well for us.

Gulotta’s earlier discussion of the 1980s Satanic Panic also undermines the idea that it was driven by “sincere convictions”:

Memoirs began to be published concerning supposed Satanic cults and survivors of demonic possession, the most famous being Michelle Remembers (1980). Crimes with supposed connections to Satanic activity began to emerge, with the only evidence derived from the (subsequently discredited) practice of “recovered memory.” There arose a shocking, and frankly implausible, volume of accusations of child abuse by devil-worshipping cults at day cares, like those in Kern County, California. Soon an industry of so-called Satanic cult experts emerged, ready to offer their “expertise” to law enforcement and in courtrooms, as well as offering seminars and classes for the masses. For example, Dale W. Griffis offered his testimony as an expert on Satanic cults in the notorious trial of the West Memphis Three, despite having received his degree from an unaccredited university.

None of the drivers of the Satanic Panic mentioned here were sincere. Michelle Remembers was a hoax. Dale W. Griffis was a money-chasing disciple of Mike Warnke — another brazen, deliberate grifter. The Kern County cases were cooked up and exploited by shamelessly ambitious prosecutors in pursuit of higher office.

None of these people “really believed” in any of the Satanic conspiracies they were creating and propagating. They just had dollar signs in their eyes.

As someone once wrote:

So money was one motive for those who first created and began to spread these rumors. Theirs is the easiest case. Greed is relatively mundane and uncomplicated. But what of the others, what of those who pretended to believe these rumors and enthusiastically spread it to others without the possibility of financial benefit?

Theirs is a far more complicated, and more interesting, situation.

But if it was more complicated and interesting than the naked financial greed of the grifters, it was still a far cry from “sincere and well-meaning.”

evangelicals

Mike Warnke

Satanic baby-killers

Previous Post

March 2, 2021

We're born again, there's new grass on the field

Next Post

March 4, 2021 Remember the girl with the beehive hairdo?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who played cymbals in Temple worship?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Asaph Moses David Solomon