Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
We’re born again, there’s new grass on the field

We’re born again, there’s new grass on the field

Last updated on: March 2, 2021 at 3:57 pm by Fred Clark

We’re born again, there’s new grass on the field 2021-03-02T15:57:46-05:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

• This post is a bit weedy and academic and theory-ish, but also true and necessary, both for academic/theory-ish reasons and for practical reasons that apply to those of us interested in the political implications of theology and the theological implications of politics if not in the particular discipline of “political theology” per se:

“Political theology” is not a distinctive species of the genus theology. All theology is intrinsically political. All theology bears on our shared life together: it lays down norms of conduct, defines communities in terms of insiders and outsiders, and puts forward certain claims of legitimacy and authority. It is only the cultural idiosyncracies of post-Westphalia European secularism that prevents us from seeing that by setting up “religion” as this separate thing that must be kept as far from “politics” as possible. This is not to say that I advocate or support any particular avowedly “theological” form of politics — the vast majority seem to me to be hugely destructive. But I oppose them not for the formalistic reason that they are “theological” and thus don’t belong in politics, but for the reason that they are destructive.

• John Oliver’s Last Week Tonight addresses police raids. This is worth your time:

Just to focus on one small infuriating detail here: In most of America, when the police raid the wrong house, knocking down the wrong front door and damaging the wrong home for absolutely no reason, they have no obligation to clean up their mess, fix what they’ve broken, or replace the innocent family’s now-useless front door.

And police do this all the time.

Here in our township, if the municipal snowplows damage anyone’s mailbox, the township quickly replaces it. For free, with their compliments and apologies. My next-door neighbor got one of these a few years ago, set up before all the snow had even melted.

So as a tiny, tiny, tiny first step in addressing the authoritarian absurdity of reckless and ridiculously disproportionate police raids, let me suggest a bit of local legislation — reproducible in every municipality and jurisdiction. Introduce and pass laws mandating that when police knock down the wrong door, they’re required to replace it and to compensate families for any other damage inflicted by their negligently misdirected raid.

That won’t fix all the many problems highlighted in Oliver’s piece, but it’d be a good first step. And I’d love to see anyone anywhere try to oppose such a law.

• We don’t have any original audio recordings of the Apostle Paul. Of course, we don’t have audio recordings of anyone from the first century, but I think we’re especially missing out in Paul’s case because I’m pretty sure he did funny voices.

Specifically, I think he did a sarcastic-dumb-guy voice. You know the “Durrrrr-uh-I’m-a-big-doofus-uh-dur-dur-durrrr” voice, or at least whatever the first-century Mediterranean equivalent of that was. I’m pretty sure Paul did a funny voice like that because he wrote in that voice all the time. It was one of his favorite ways of presenting an argument: What? Are we supposed to think this, [insert dumb-guy-voice Bad Argument No. 1]? Or this, [DGV Bad Argument No. 2]? No, don’t be stupid! It’s this, [Paul’s actual conclusion].

But because we don’t have the audio — or even a text with punctuation — this device often gets misread, mistranslated, or misinterpreted in such a way that the ideas Paul mocked in sarcastic-dumb-guy-voice are taken as Apostolic Edicts with the force of holy scripture. The ideas he tells us to dismiss get embraced and his actual conclusions get ignored.

This happens a lot and it’s a big problem.

• Speaking of original biblical manuscripts … Here’s a fascinating Twitter thread by Nick Falacci about the (failed) attempt to produce a pristine copy of Citizen Kane for the 50th anniversary of the classic film. This is a 20th-century story involving a mass-produced text that was both revered and commercially valuable. But the original is gone and the best version we now have is a flawed, damaged, mix-and-match creation pieced together from fragments of copies.

Now think about the far greater challenge of remastering a pristine copy of, say, the Gospel of Mark. OK, then.

• “The Dragon of Wantley.”

Photo by Dave Pickersgill via Atlas Obscura (click for more photos)

I’m fascinated by the way popular culture preserves and encodes true stories and the meanings of those stories. Like, for example, our local ghost story which — more than a century later — led to the discovery of a very real mass grave.

The legend of the Dragon of Wantley never required a great deal of decoding. Everybody always knew what that story was really about, as Andres Schiffino writes for Atlas Obscura:

According to legends, a bat-winged, scaly dragon terrorized the villagers who lived near the region of Wantley (modern-day Wharncliffe Crags). The beast was massive and could swallow trees and buildings. The dragon was nearly invincible to any weapons, save for one rather sensitive spot.

A knight by the name of Moore took time off from his usual drinking and womanizing to end the dragon’s reign of terror. Wearing a specially designed suit of armor covered with spikes, Moore battled the dragon. The fight ended when Moore delivered a fatal blow by kicking the monster right in, what the original English ballad declares as, the “arse-gut.”

The true story behind this unusual legend, according to historians, involved a legal dispute in 1573. A lawsuit was taken against the Lord of the Manor of Sheffield, George Talbot, the sixth Earl of Shrewsbury. The lord was accused of misappropriating funds meant to pay for civic works, church upkeep, and helping the poor. The crusading lawyer who took the case on behalf of the people of Sheffield was named George More.

The legend and the ballad were the people’s way of indirectly mocking the corrupt, greedy landlord. Such artful indirection was wise because corrupt, greedy landlords are notoriously thin-skinned and, when mocked directly, they sometimes respond by running for president out of spite.

• It’s finally March and baseball is being played. It’s exhibition baseball, down in Florida, and the fields around here are still covered in snow. But it’s starting.

Previous Post

March 1, 2021

QAnon is a hoax designed for revenge against parents

Next Post

March 3, 2021 Moral panics are not moral crusades

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What Old Testament law was summarized as "love your neighbor as yourself"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

First five commandments Book of Leviticus only The whole law Only 10th commandment