Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

slacktivist

You climbed on the ladder and you know how it feels

Last updated on: January 30, 2021 at 4:42 pm   by Fred Clark

You climbed on the ladder and you know how it feels 2021-01-30T16:42:41-05:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

• This is creeeeeeepy. It’s like a Little House on the Prairie reboot written by Shirley Jackson and Nathaniel Hawthorne.

• “Two Oath-of-Office Stories Embody a Divided America.” Andrew L. Seidel looks at the white Christian nationalist obsession with office holders swearing in using anything other than a white Christian nationalist Bible.

I’ll just add, again, that the Bible is the worst possible book to place one’s hand on when taking any oath. Use a copy of the Constitution, or the Riverside Shakespeare, or a dictionary, or a phone book if you can still find one. Any of those would be better because, unlike the Bible, none of those books expressly and explicitly forbid the swearing of oaths.

“Do not swear at all,” the Bible says. “Let your word be ‘Yes, Yes’ or ‘No, No’; anything more than this comes from the evil one.”

If you’re taking an oath of office or “swearing in” in court, you shouldn’t be anywhere near a book that says such a thing. Placing your hand on a Bible undermines whatever oath you’re swearing, introducing a level of paradox and irony that’s no different than if you were crossing your fingers and winking broadly during the swearing-in.

• Here’s another example of an evangelical attempt to grapple with “conspiracy theories” that flops and founders because it misdiagnoses the problem: “The Church is experiencing a real division between those who support and disseminate conspiracy theories and those who consider them only the result of ignorance.”

No. The problem is not ignorance, or gullibility, or naivete, or well-intentioned misinformation. The problem is bad faith, deliberate lies, and the bearing of false witness against our neighbors.

The writer is correct that fear is a major driver of this, but he doesn’t grasp what it is they’re afraid of. It’s partly that they’re afraid of — as Robert P. Jones has written and documented — “changing demographics” and a loss of hierarchical power. But more than that, even is their deeper fear of losing the flattering identity they’ve constructed for themselves, allowing them to pretend that they are society’s moral leaders and moral exemplars — the Good Guys. That deeper fear is entirely justified because that identity is rapidly crumbling, bringing with it the awful dread that comes from asking “Are we the baddies?” and realizing that the answer, undeniably, has been yes all along.

• Charles Kuffner knows that “The ‘Resign, Ted’ Caucus” won’t convince insurrectionist Sen. Ted Cruz to resign, and he knows that those calling for that entirely appropriate resignation knows this too. But, as he writes, their efforts may bear fruit in other ways:

The goal here isn’t resignations, because that’s not going to happen, but to rebrand these politicians and make their seditious actions stick with them. Can they make Cruz and Paxton et al toxic to mainstream corporate America and dry up their fundraising? Can they change how they are covered and portrayed by the media, so that their anti-democratic activity front and center in any story that includes them? Can they help drive this narrative so that less-engaged voters are aware of it, and are aware of the need for them to take action in the next elections? Even if it’s just helping them know that Ted Cruz spends more time Twitter fighting than doing anything to make their lives better? These things are more achievable. That’s the way to think about it, and to think about what you can do to help. There have to be consequences for what they did. This is a part of that, and we all have a role to play in it.

I’d add one more reason that “Resign” is an appropriate one-word response to people like Cruz and Paxton and Hawley and Rep. Scott Perry here in Pennsylvania: Because it is, in fact, appropriate. It is their due — what is due to them and what is due from them. Yes, they may all be thoroughly irresponsible people, but their irresponsibility does not mean that responsibility itself does not exist outside of them. They may have the ability to behave immorally and unethically, but they do not have the power to abolish the existence of morals and ethics.

So we say “Resign, Ted,” in part, to remind the world of that and to demonstrate that this is the nicest thing that any decent person can have to say to him at this point.

• Cops behaving badly.

• The lyric in the title of this post has been in my head because I just finished a 9-nights-in-a-row stretch as a ladder jockey doing “overhead organization” at the Big Box.

The song that lyric comes from is now 35 years old. The Waterboys’ original version wasn’t a hit in 1985, and barely charted when re-released in the ’90s. But it was gorgeous and ambitious and strange, and so it has endured, becoming whatever the 21st-century version of a standard is.

It’s not a love song, but what is it, exactly? Mike Scott says he was thinking about C.S. Lewis and Jimi Hendrix when he wrote it. (And he’s said he wasn’t thinking about Prince often enough that I’m pretty sure he was.) Lewis’ influence can be heard there, I think, in the singer’s longing to go beyond the “Shadowlands” toward something more real than real. But really the song works because the answer to “Who is this about?” is always going to be “Whoever the listener needs it to be about.”

Anyway, Fiona Apple recorded a version of this late last year, and it’s lovely.

 

evangelicals

CopsBehavingBadly

democracy

religious right

Satanic baby-killers

Previous Post



January 28, 2021

Singing Kumbaya with insurrectionists and antisemites

Next Post



January 30, 2021 Postcards from the class & culture wars (1.30.21)


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "Capernaum" mean?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Port of peace Place of water City of trade Village of comfort

Related posts from slacktivist

Family

Is this the right room for an argument?

slacktivist

Family

The Amish are not 'Evangelicals.' They're Amish.

slacktivist

Family

The lumpers, the splitters, and me

slacktivist

Family

'Is it right on red or left on...

slacktivist

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian

How to Make a Decision When You Can't...

Main point: It’s much more valuable to stay close to God so...

Archdiocese Hosts Military Marriage Retreat in Germany

RASTATT, Germany — The transient military lifestyle, with its frequent deployments and...

Minted in God's Image

Nearly every morning, I make the drive to Detroit with my high-school-age...

The Real AI Story Is Adoption Without Trust

Artificial intelligence has crossed a political threshold. It is no longer a...

Walking through History

  A new article, written by Jeff Lindsay and Gale L. Pooley,...

Swimfan: Forgotten Aughts Pleasures

This is a recovery effort. In 2002, My Big Fat Greek Wedding...

view all Progressive Christian blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube