Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

slacktivist

The 1611 Project

Last updated on: December 3, 2020 at 8:20 pm   by Fred Clark

The 1611 Project 2020-12-03T20:20:34-05:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

A while back I changed my Twitter handle to “The 1611 Project.” So let me explain that.

For those who didn’t grow up in white fundamentalist American churches, 1611 is a Big Date for white Christians because it marked the publication of the KJV — the authorized and official King James Version of the Bible.

The KJV wasn’t the first English translation of the Bible, or even the first such translation approved by the English-speaking church. But it would become the first mass-produced English translation, the version of the Bible that would make white Bible Christianity possible.

First Quarto of the King James Bible, 1612 (Wikimedia photo by Jeremylinvip)

Bible Christianity — what eventually became “evangelicalism” — did not exist for most of Christian history. It hadn’t yet been possible for it to exist. Evangelical Christianity is proudly “Bible-based,” and that wasn’t something it was possible to be without readable Bibles in the hands of ordinary laypeople. The mass-production and mass-consumption of the KJV is what made English-speaking evangelicalism a possibility. Such a thing could not exist before the availability of a readable, affordable, accessible Bible in every Christian home. The possibility of its existence began in 1611.

Here was a new thing. English-speaking Christians now had the opportunity to read the Bible for themselves, on their own, unmediated by liturgy or clergy. This was not something they would be able to learn to do from prior generations of Christians. It was something they were going to have to figure out how to do on their own, over the coming generations, in the context of those generations.

Which brings us to the “Project” part of “The 1611 Project.” That’s a reference to The New York Times’ ambitious “1619 Project,” which explores how the history and culture of the United States was shaped by — and continues to be shaped by — slavery:

In August of 1619, a ship appeared on this horizon, near Point Comfort, a coastal port in the English colony of Virginia. It carried more than 20 enslaved Africans, who were sold to the colonists. No aspect of the country that would be formed here has been untouched by the years of slavery that followed. On the 400th anniversary of this fateful moment, it is finally time to tell our story truthfully.

And no aspect of the Christianity that would be formed here has been untouched by the years of slavery that followed. That Christianity took shape thanks to those two things that had suddenly become available in every Christian home in the English colonies of the New World: Bibles and slaves. 1611 and 1619.

There’s been a great deal written about how the presence of those Bibles shaped those English-speaking Christians’ attitudes toward slavery, but far less about how the practice of enslaving others shaped the way those English-speaking Christians taught themselves to read, study, and interpret those Bibles.

Consider, for example, historian Mark Noll’s excellent book on The Civil War as a Theological Crisis. It’s a really good book, offering a wide-ranging and insightful survey the full spectrum of ways that early 19th-century white Christians understood what “the Bible says” about slavery. But that antebellum 19th-century focus is also too late — 200 years too late. It skips over the most important aspect of this “theological crisis” — the centuries in which the practice and rationalization of slavery taught English-speaking white Christians how to read and interpret the Bible.

This is where the “evangelical” or “Bible Christian” hermeneutic comes from. Everything we take for granted about white evangelical hermeneutics was shaped by the defense of slavery — the clobber-texting literalism, chapter-and-verse concordance-ism, even the faux-naive pretense that it isn’t even a “hermeneutic” at all because such a fancy-sounding term isn’t necessary for good-hearted good people reading their own Bibles for their own selves. It was — and still is — a hermeneutic designed to bless blasphemy and sin.

Acknowledging that is a necessary step for any attempt to separate evangelical Christianity from its pervasively intrinsic white supremacy. And that is only the first step before beginning the much longer, harder task of re-learning to read those Bibles we suddenly got our hands on back in 1611.

I’m not convinced that American white evangelicals will ever be willing or capable to take such steps. But there’s a sliver of hope in the current ferocity of their attacks on “critical race theory,” which is never accurately described, yet widely condemned as the bogeyman du jour for “conservative” white evangelicals. See, for example, Jemar Tisby’s summary of such condemnations in his fine post: “Southern Baptist seminary presidents reaffirm their commitment to whiteness.” These Southern Baptists would say that their main concern here is the “defense of scripture,” which in their minds requires a defense of whiteness because they’re at least dimly aware that their peculiar way of reading and interpreting the Bible is inextricably linked to that whiteness, that they cannot secure the one without defending the other.

 

While this dim awareness remains unexplored and has not been consciously acknowledged, their attacks on whatever it is they imagine “critical race theory” to be are making the link between their hermeneutic and their whiteness increasingly obvious and explicit. Perhaps it will eventually become obvious and explicit enough that even they will come to understand what it is that they’re saying. Should that time ever come, they’ll have some consequential choices to make.

evangelicals

Bible

history

religious right

SBC

slavery

Previous Post



December 2, 2020

'Epistemic nihilism'

Next Post



December 7, 2020 The Benjamin Button version of Martin Niemoller


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What Christian group believes in continuing revelation from prophets?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Lutherans Baptists Latter-day Saints Presbyterians

Related posts from slacktivist

Family

It's not 'pick and choose.' It's pick a...

slacktivist

Family

Is this the right room for an argument?

slacktivist

Family

Team Everybody sliding into our DMs

slacktivist

Family

Texts of terror? Terrific!

slacktivist

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian

Notes toward planning my funeral

  I'm pleased to report that the fortieth installment of our Becoming...

From Beginning to End, Scripture Is Pro-Physical Bodies

C. S. Lewis spoke of Christians to whom the body was “‘a...

Michele's Reviews - Get to Work by Jonny...

  Get to Work: Seeing Your Daily Grind as God’s Good Gift...

I Used to be Small

My Journey from Faith to Wholeness by Karl Forehand For those leaving...

Chapter 1, Sarah: The Impossible Choice

Open and Relational Theology & Social Psychology About this series: This series...

Political Gain from Personal Pain is Ungodly

By now, the story has reached the far edges of the internet:...

view all Progressive Christian blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube