Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
‘Allegiance to a particular notion of American identity’

‘Allegiance to a particular notion of American identity’

Last updated on: November 2, 2020 at 5:12 pm by Fred Clark

‘Allegiance to a particular notion of American identity’ 2020-11-02T17:12:26-05:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The 2018 Netflix documentary Behind the Curve looks at the internet-advertising-driven phenomenon of 21st-century “Flat Earth” enthusiasts. One highlight of the film involves the flat-Earth proponents scraping together $20,000 to purchase a state-of-the-art laser gyroscope that they are convinced will prove once and for all, scientifically, that the planet we all share is neither round nor rotating.

This foray into actual science does not go well for the science-denying (and sailing-denying and Dante-denying) conspiracy theorists:

This is a humiliating moment for poor Bob Knodel, a man whose career and reputation were built on the popularity of his flat-Earth videos online. What he had hoped and expected to be his moment of glorious victory turns, instead, into categorical defeat as his expensive gyroscope demonstrates — conclusively — that our big blue marble is spinning in space.

Knodel staked his credibility on a factual claim that was conclusively proved to be false. This was a major blow not just to him, but to the entire flat-Earth “movement.”

Something similar happened in 2012 for adherents of the equally bogus “birther” conspiracy hoax. The foremost proponent of that theory, Donald J. Trump, had — just like Bob Knodel — wagered his reputation and a big pile of money on a single high-stakes experiment that he claimed would prove, once and for all, that President Barack Obama was born in Kenya. To prove this Trump wouldn’t need a laser gyroscope, he just needed to get his hands on Obama’s long-form birth certificate. Everything hinged on that long-form birth certificate, Trump said, claiming to have hired a squadron of private investigators to track it down. Once that long-form birth certificate was made public, Trump assured his followers, he and his birtherism would be proved correct.

This played out for Trump exactly the way the gyroscope experiment played out for flat-Earther Knodel. President Obama got the original, official, notarized “long-form” birth certificate from the Hawaii hospital where he was born and released it publicly, conclusively proving that Trump and his “birther” theories were utterly wrong.

So what happened when Trump’s claims and assurances were proved to be utterly, humiliatingly wrong? Well, among other things, he was invited to Liberty University to address its students at a mandatory convocation and receive an honorary business degree.

This is recounted in a sweeping Politico report on Liberty’s travails following the ouster of long-time school president Jerry Falwell Jr., “‘They All Got Careless’: How Falwell Kept His Grip on Liberty Amid Sexual ‘Games,’ Self-Dealing“:

Trump travelled to Liberty to speak at its biweekly convocation, where Falwell called him “one of the most influential political leaders in the United States,” lavished praise on him for having “single-handedly forced President Obama to release his birth certificate” and considering a run for president, and presented him with an honorary Liberty business degree.

This seems bizarre. No one “lavished praise” or bestowed honorary degrees upon Bob Knodel for having “single-handedly forced” science to prove he was a foolish, dishonest man. Yet there were Jerry Falwell Jr. and the full institutional weight of Liberty University doing exactly that for Donald Trump — and doing so not in spite of, but because of his abject humiliation.

This doesn’t seem to have been a quid pro quo gesture by Liberty, the kind of sleazy-but-conventional conferring of an honorary degree that sometimes follows a large contribution from a wealthy donor. It was just something the school chose to do, as an expression of its values, after months of Trump publicly accusing the president of dishonestly before, ultimately, being exposed himself as a shameless liar and a fool. Falwell and Liberty, the school’s board members, administration, and academic leaders all witnessed Trump’s epic failure and fraudulence and they thought to themselves: Let’s reward that. Let’s affirm that. Let’s bring some of that here, as a model for our students.

Liberty University, in other words, didn’t even have as much good sense as members of the flat-Earth “movement” demonstrated when they sidelined Knodel for his version of Trump’s historic own-goal.

Adam Serwer doesn’t mention Liberty’s 2012 celebration of Trump or its endorsement of his birtherism in “Birtherism of a Nation,” his Atlantic essay from earlier this year, but what he writes here explains the white evangelical school’s otherwise inexplicable decision. It did not matter to Liberty’s board members that Trump and his birtherism had been proved false, because the whole “theory” never had anything to do with the actual facts of Obama’s birth (in the United States, to a mother who was a U.S. citizen). Liberty’s endorsement of birtherism was, Serwer writes, “a statement of values” — of explicitly antebellum, white-supremacist values:

Birtherism was never meant to answer a factual query. Birtherism is not trying to explain some purportedly mysterious phenomenon, like Tupac Shakur’s unending posthumous releases, the lingering sight of water condensation behind aircraft, or how 19 hijackers evaded detection and managed to execute the most successful terrorist attack in American history. These theories are outlandish, weird, and offensive, but they are all attempts at answering actual questions, even if those questions are stupid. Birtherism was, from the beginning, an answer looking for a question to justify itself.

Birtherism was a statement of values, a way to express allegiance to a particular notion of American identity, one that became the central theme of the Trump campaign itself: To Make America Great Again, to turn back the clock to an era where white political and cultural hegemony was unthreatened by black people, by immigrants, by people of a different faith. By people like Barack Obama. The calls to disavow birtherism missed the point: Trump’s entire campaign was birtherism.

Trump won the Republican primary, and united the party, in part because his run was focused on the psychic wound of the first black presidency. He had, after all, humiliated and humbled Obama. None of the other Republican candidates could make such a claim. None could say, as Trump could, that they had put the first black president in his place. And so none could offer an answer to the anguish that produced birtherism. That very same anguish helped Trump win the presidency.

You could call birtherism a conspiracy theory, sure. But in 2020, looking at the Trump administration’s efforts to diminish the power of minority voters, imprison child migrants, ban Muslim travelers from entering the country, and criminalize his political opposition, it could be more accurately described as the governing ideology of the United States.

Liberty university’s “allegiance to a particular notion of American identity” was not a product or result of Trump’s birtherism. That allegiance pre-existed Obama’s presidency and Trump’s recent turn toward the religious right. It was the purpose and cause of the school’s founding: Christian nationalism. Which is to say, always, white nationalism.

That is the cause for Liberty University’s existence, the “spirit” of its founding that the Liberty alumni group “Save71” hopes to restore in sweeping Jerry Jr.’s scandals under the rug. What happened in ’71? Jerry Falwell Sr. founded a college in defense of “a particular notion of American identity.”

And everything about Liberty University ever since has been in service to that particular notion.

BWAA? (But What About Abortion?) What about the purported flagship issue of Falwell’s Moral Majority, and of the rest of the religious right, and of the entirety of white evangelical identity, white evangelical doctrine, piety, and practice for the last 40 years?

This is no different from birtherism and Trumpism. It’s always been all about “judges” — about the federal judiciary and the Supreme Court above all, the pious purpose of appointing “pro-life” justices there who would overturn settled laws and interpret the Constitution in such a way as to “protect the unborn and the sanctity of life.”

But every single judge white evangelicals have ever supported in the name of that cause also just so happened to be a judge who was committed, above all, to “a particular notion of American identity.” Which is to say that every single one of them seeks to downplay, dismiss, disregard or demolish the Reconstruction Amendments and their unqualified, emphatic expansion beyond that cramped antebellum and explicitly white definition of legitimate American identity. (Nowadays these nominees are not even judges — they’re lawyers or lobbyists or professors or even recent law school grads. The pool of plausibly qualified actual judges willing to ignore 150 years of black-letter constitutional law was long ago depleted.)

Birtherism was never about the obviously false claim that Barack Obama was not born in Hawaii. Nor was it about the obviously false claim that his mother was not an American citizen. It was simply a racist howl of protest against the 14th Amendment — a rejection of its blanket statement that “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.”

That same howl of protest, dressed up in fancier language, is the paramount concern of two-thirds of the justices now sitting on the Supreme Court. And it is the paramount concern of the white evangelical Christian nationalism that put them there.

Previous Post

October 31, 2020

A More Perfect Union

Next Post

November 3, 2020 I don't have a friend who feels at ease

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

In Jude, what did the Lord do to the people he saved from Egypt who did not believe?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Cast them into the wilderness Punished them Destroyed them Let them wander forty years