This ain’t a ‘historical narrative,’ it’s living memory

Last updated on: May 26, 2020 at 2:37 pm by Fred Clark

This ain’t a ‘historical narrative,’ it’s living memory 2020-05-26T14:37:40-04:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I’m a “New Associate Coach” at the Big Box which, as the name suggests, is big. On Day One for new hires, there’s a lot of ground to cover — literally. We have to introduce them to all kinds of retail lingo and Big Box-specific jargon, processes, procedures, policies, people, tools, tasks, tricks, etc., and we have to cover all of that quickly. It’s way to much for anyone to absorb at one time.

So what I tell the newbies is this: Relax. This is new to you, and you’re hearing it for the first time. Don’t worry about remembering all of this now. There won’t be a quiz at the end of this tour. You won’t remember all of this until after you’ve heard it three times, and in order for you to hear it three times, we’ve got to get the first time out of the way, and that’s what we’re doing now.

That’s how it works when we’re introduced to something new — especially to something new to us that’s too big to absorb all at once. The first time we encounter it, all the strange lingo and territory and information all at once can be kind of dizzying. That’s fine. It doesn’t all need to sink in the first time. That comes later, after the first encounter rinses away some of that strangeness.

This isn’t a historical “narrative.” It’s a screenshot from a video. And I remember this. I was 12.

This is why I’m feeling sympathetic toward conservative pundit David French as he struggles to maintain his footing after what seems to be his very first encounter with Randall Balmer: “Fact and Fiction About Racism and the Rise of the Religious Right.”

That column is a good example of why we don’t give newbies a quiz after their first big tour on Day One. It would be cruelly unfair to require anybody to absorb and understand so much new information all at once. Alas for David French, he’s a pundit, and thus felt compelled to give himself such a quiz — in writing, in public — and that doesn’t work out so well for him. His attempt to respond to Balmer’s history of the religious right goes sideways because he wrote it before he gave himself a chance to absorb all the new information he was newly encountering.

Granted, this shouldn’t be entirely new information for someone French’s age. What he defensively lashes out at as Balmer’s “narrative” of history ought to be part of his living memory. It’s part of mine and we’re roughly the same age. Like me, David French grew up in a white evangelical church that was lockstep conservative politically long before abortion politics ever became a thing for our people. That didn’t happen until we were teenagers. Before that, abortion politics wasn’t even a blip on our radar. I didn’t need to read Randall Balmer to learn that, I lived it. It ain’t history. It’s memory.

To be fair, French was only 11 years old when Ronald Reagan was elected president with the overwhelming support of the religious right and of white Christians like his family and mine. And by the time you’re in your 50s, memories of being 11 may have grown a bit fuzzy. It’s easy to project current attitudes back onto that past, blurring and confusing the earlier bits with the later bits. And that’s especially true of mythological, um, narratives that we’ve been steeped in for decades — such as the suggestion that the 1980 election was all about white Christians turning into Reagan Republicans because of abortion politics.

Nope. That didn’t happen. White Christian support for Reagan in 1980 wasn’t about abortion. It was about Commies, and the hostages, and the Commies, and welfare queens and “states rights” and the Commies. That’s harder to remember today than it is to remember, say, Tug McGraw striking out Willie Wilson to end the 1980 World Series, but then we haven’t had decades of self-aggrandizing myth-making intent on convincing us the Phillies never beat the Royals.

In any case, it’s not Randall Balmer’s “narrative” or “theory” that abortion politics didn’t come to reshape white evangelical politics (and theology, and ecclesiology, and identity, and doctrine, and piety, evangelism, spiritual practice, prayer, hermeneutics, education, discipline, etc.) until more than a decade after Roe v. Wade. It’s simply what happened. I was there. I remember.

You don’t have to take my word for it, though. Here’s the editors of the belligerently conservative journal First Things, describing early 1980s white Christian support for Reagan in 1996: “At that time the Cold War was the dominant fact in international affairs and largely shaped domestic politics.” That’s from the introduction to the journal’s reprinting of its founder’s 1981 manifesto “Christianity and Democracy” on its 15th anniversary. That essay never mentions abortion politics. Or abortion. At all. It argues, rather, that anti-communism ought to be the No. 1 priority for good white Christian voters, and that anything else is a dangerous and irresponsible distraction from that paramount concern.

Nobody indignantly condemned Richard John Neuhaus in 1981 for failing to mention the moral horror white evangelicals were experiencing after years of legal abortion had forced them to confront the new reality of millions of “murdered babies.” Because that moral horror hadn’t yet been conjured up. White evangelicals were Cold Warriors and as long as the Cold War was a sufficient basis for their politics, theology, and identity, it wasn’t necessary yet for them to reinvent themselves as culture warriors.

Anyway, the really fascinating thing about David French’s premature response to Randall Balmer is the way it confirms and exemplifies the very history/memory that Balmer recounts. If you want to understand how the religious right rose as a backlash reaction to the Civil Rights Movement, read Randall Balmer. If you want to see what that looks like, in practice, read that David French column. We’ll return to this subject later, in greater detail, but it’s spring at the Big Box and I’ve got to go coach some new associates.

evangelicals

religious right

Satanic baby-killers

Previous Post

May 21, 2020

Snake-handling is unwise, but at least it's not contagious

Next Post

May 28, 2020 The Civil Rights Movement shattered white evangelical identity

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What animal spoke to Balaam?

Select your answer to see how you score.

A donkey A lamb A lion A dove