Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
LBCF, No. 235: ‘Pan-Con One’

LBCF, No. 235: ‘Pan-Con One’

Last updated on: May 10, 2019 at 5:34 pm by Fred Clark

LBCF, No. 235: ‘Pan-Con One’ 2019-05-10T17:34:44-04:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Originally posted January 25, 2010.

You can read this entire series, for free, via the convenient Left Behind Index. The ebook collection The Anti-Christ Handbook: Volume 1, is available on Amazon for just $0.99. Brian Kemp wants to know when you last had your period. Volume 2 of The Anti-Christ Handbook, completing all the posts on the first Left Behind book, is also now available. Volume 3 is coming someday.

Tribulation Force, pp. 139-147

* * SPOILER ALERT * *

Rayford Steele will eventually take the job of Head Chief Master Boss Pilot of Air Force One.

No, this doesn’t mean that “Captain” Steele is going to enlist in the Air Force. In Tribulation Force, “Air Force” One seems to be a civilian plane, evidently staffed by a civilian crew from the passenger carrier Pan Continental Airlines. The airline also apparently oversees the hiring and vetting of the pilot, with no input from the White House.

Here it may be helpful to draw a distinction between the fantastic realms of LaHaye World and Jenkins World. LaHaye World, as we’ve discussed, is the through-the-looking-glass alternate universe in which it would be possible for the allegedly biblical prophecies outlined by Tim LaHaye to come true. Jenkins World is also an alien landscape, also radically different from the world in which we live, but those differences aren’t preconditions for prophecy — they’re simply the result of ignorance and a lack of research. Thus in Jenkins World we have cruise ships on the Jordan River, the island of Manhattan stretches north into New England, and the presidential airplane called “Air Force One” is actually just a commercial airliner leased or chartered by the executive branch of the federal government.

The spoiler alert above is just a joke. It’s not really possible to give “spoilers” for the Left Behind series. Jerry Jenkins’ idea of foreshadowing is to spend three chapters ponderously telling you what’s going to happen in the fourth. That leaves readers with three chapters in which absolutely nothing happens that might be revealed in a spoiler, followed by one chapter that comes pre-spoiled.

And that’s within the broad outlines of the series, which readers are forewarned is going to closely follow LaHaye’s prophecy outline. So it’s no spoiler to tell you ahead of time that our heroes have in store for them a huge earthquake, locusts, water turning into blood, Armageddon and the rest of that. The only surprise is how long it takes the authors to get around to all that apocalyptic stuff.

What we get, instead, are pages and pages of the sort of thing we read today: Rayford’s class trip to Human Resources.

Rayford and his boss, Earl, are still right where we left them, circling around in the same conversation with Earl telling him he shouldn’t have proselytized at his flight examiner and him insisting to Earl that the flight examiner was the one person on earth he didn’t try that with. To spare us time, I’ll paraphrase:

“Shouldn’t have.”
“Didn’t.”
“Shouldn’t have.”
“Didn’t.”
(3x)

Earl mixes in a little variety by introducing the idea that Rayford’s religious aggression may cost him his chance to become the pilot of Air Force One, to which Rayford responds that he wouldn’t have wanted the job anyway.

“Shouldn’t have.”
“Didn’t.”
“If you hadn’t, then you could’ve.”
“I don’t want to, but anyway I didn’t.”
“Shouldn’t have.”
“Didn’t.”
“Everybody wants to, so you shouldn’t have.”
“Not me, and I didn’t.”
d.c. al coda

And after three or four pages of that you start to think it would have been far more frightening and disturbing in The Shining if Shelley Duvall had tiptoed up to Jack Nicholson’s desk to find that this was what he’d been busily typing all those weeks up there at the Overlook Hotel. Compared to a dozen pages of this, hundreds of pages of “All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy” seems reasonable and interesting.

Rayford Steele shares the good news of salvation with his co-workers at Pan-Continental Airlines.

The babbling pilots finally pull out of their conversational tailspin with this:

“Why is this so important to you, Earl?”

“You don’t know?”

“I don’t.”

“Because it’s something I’ve dreamed of all my life,” Earl said. “I kept up on all the latest certifications all my years in this position, and I’ve applied for the pilot’s job with every new president.”

“I never knew that.”

“Of course you didn’t. Who would admit that and let the world know he got his guts ripped out every four or eight years, seeing other guys get the job? Your getting it would be the next best thing. I could enjoy it vicariously.”

And in two short paragraphs readers know more about Earl Halliday than we have learned about Rayford Steele or Buck Williams in nearly 600 pages. Earl’s hopes and dreams may not make sense (if your goal in life is to be the pilot of Air Force One, then you might want to join the Air Force), but at least we know he has hopes and dreams. He wants something. It would be possible for an actor playing this scene to get a handle on Earl, but the actor playing Rayford would, like the reader, have no way of knowing what makes this guy tick.

We get another full page of “shouldn’t have”/”didn’t” until finally — 13 pages into this conversation — it occurs to Rayford to ask what, specifically, this new complaint against him says:

Earl buzzed his secretary. “Francine, bring me your notes on the complaint you got from Dallas this morning.” She brought him a single typed sheet …

Typed. Probably on carbon paper. This was written in 1996 and set in the future.

… She brought him a single typed sheet. Earl read it and slid it across the desk to Rayford. It read:

Took a call at 11:37 a.m. from a woman who identified herself as Jean Garfield, secretary to Pan-Con Certification Examiner Jim Long of Dallas. Asked how to go about lodging a complaint of religious harassment against Rayford Steele due to his pressuring Long during his recert this A.M. Told her I would get back to her. She did not leave a number, but said she would call back later.

“This smells,” Rayford tells Earl, pointing out that flight examiners don’t have secretaries! (dum-dum dummm).

And so they do some “detective” work (Jenkins’ word) and discover that no one named Jim Long works as an examiner for Pan-Continental and nobody named Jean Garfield works for the company either. They have proof, in other words, that it was all just a set-up.

So, OK, why? Why would someone do that? And how? And what would the purpose possibly be? Here you have a guy who, by his own admission, has harassed* every single Pan-Con employee he has encountered with only one exception, so what’s the point in trying to frame him for religious harassment by accusing him of harassing that one guy he actually left alone?

We eventually sort of get a sort of explanation for this belabored tangent. (Nicolae and Hattie are trying to manipulate Rayford into taking the Air Force One job by trumping up charges to disqualify him from it. Or something.) But I think the main point here didn’t have anything to do with the plot. I think it was an attempt to demonstrate the virtuousness of Rayford’s character.

The world of Left Behind doesn’t have any place for the usual sorts of things that might mark a character as virtuous or heroic. The members of the Tribulation Force don’t take decisive action, they do not sacrifice themselves for others, they are not brave, determined, loyal, honest, valiant or clever. And they don’t ever really do much of anything. So L&J instead decide, as a kind of short-hand, to show that they are Falsely Accused and therefore Righteous.

I don’t really follow the “therefore” there. I mean, good people may be falsely accused, but being falsely accused does not necessarily imply that one is a good person.

But it’s not important here that this makes sense to me. It’s L&J’s fantasy, not mine. And for L&J, being falsely accused is the hallmark of virtue. Jesus said so in the Beatitude (the way RTCs read the Gospels, there’s just the one): “Blessed are you when people insult you, persecute you and falsely say all kinds of evil against you because of me.”

This is a favorite verse for every American Christian who believes he is persecuted by the store clerk who wishes him happiness during the holidays, or by the presence of that one congressman from that one district who said he wasn’t 100-percent sure of the existence of God. Or — more pertinent here — who feels persecuted by that boss who warns him to stop pestering his co-workers about the damnation of their souls after they’ve asked him politely to stop for the third time. Such RTCs can reassure themselves by reciting the Beatitude and reminding themselves that they are Falsely Accused and therefore Righteous, just like Rayford Steele.

– – – – – – – – – – – –

* Just to be clear, “witnessing” to a co-worker or inviting them to church is not, in itself, religious harassment.

The rules against religious harassment are roughly parallel to the rules for sexual harassment. Asking a co-worker out on a date is not, in itself, harassment. But refusing to take No for an answer is. As long as you’re willing to accept No for an answer, you’re perfectly free to ask out or proselytize everybody in the office. Once. (It’s a bit more complicated if you’re their boss rather than their peer. With that power dynamic, any religious or romantic invitation becomes implicitly coercive, so such invitations are out of bounds.) Rayford could have done that, but chose not to. He chose, instead, to confront his co-workers not with the religious equivalent of “Would you like to join me for a drink after work?” but with something more like the religious analog of “How’s about a quickie in the conference room?” accompanied by an awkward attempt to cop a feel. This approach is just as winsome and winning for religion as it is for romance.

Uncategorized

Left Behind

Previous Post

May 9, 2019

Sister, won't you tell me where I went so wrong

Next Post

May 14, 2019 The T-shirt is fake. The harmful theology is 'real.'

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was the major prophet during King Hezekiah's reign in Judah?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Daniel Isaiah Jeremiah Ezekiel