Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
The shock jocks are in charge now

The shock jocks are in charge now

Last updated on: March 5, 2019 at 5:36 pm by Fred Clark

The shock jocks are in charge now 2019-03-05T17:36:26-05:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Harvest Bible Chapel is/was “one of the 50 largest churches in America.”

That’s an impressive-sounding category until you stop to think about it. Take a moment, though, and you’ll realize that most of the familiar names on such a list are recognizable because of their notoriety. “Church growth” is a popular topic in religious publishing, but the list of “the 50 largest churches in America” seems to offer more cautionary tales than it does models that other congregations would want to emulate.

We could almost divide that list of mega-churches into two categories: Scandal-plagued and Not-Yet-Revealed-to-Be Scandal-Plagued.

Anyway, Harvest Bible Chapel near Chicago has recently moved from the latter category into the former. Ruth “No Relation” Graham — one of the better religion reporters covering American Christianity — details that story for Slate: “How a Radio Shock Jock Helped Bring Down a Megachurch Pastor.”

Other reporting I’d seen on this story had misled me by delicately referring to the shock-jock in question — one Eric “Mancow” Muller — as a “talk radio host.” I should have picked up on that sooner since most of those reports also generously categorized Julie Roys as an “investigative journalist” rather than as the scalp-seeking right-wing gadfly I first encountered when she went after Moody Bible Institute for wavering from what she saw as “biblical” white supremacy. (I said there that Roys was part of a group of Moody critics who seemed like they were writing for the old segregationist Southern Presbyterian Journal. Roys is now writing for World — the Southern Gothic Presbyterian magazine founded to replace that old segregationist rag for readers nostalgic for its toxic perspective. So OK, then.)

I’m a long way from Chicago, so that Moody connection misled me into thinking that “talk radio host” Muller was a part of the white evangelical/fundamentalist radio world that has long thrived out of that city. (Unshackled! — the old-time radio drama produced by Chicago’s old-time Pacific Garden Mission is, like Coast-to-Coast Live, one of my favorite AM-radio guilty pleasures on late-night road trips.) That seemed to make sense. After all, when you come across a “syndicated talk-radio host” in stories about a big white evangelical mega-church, it seems obvious that you’re reading about some syndicated Christian-talk-radio host.

But, nope, that’s not what we’re dealing with here. Muller is, as Graham says, a “shock-jock.” He calls his show “Mancow’s Morning Madhouse” and wants to be known as “the wild man of Chicago radio.” Etc., etc. You know the type. Peter-Pan complex. An “edgy, equal-opportunity offender.” Trying very hard to “shock” listeners with his “outrageous antics” and bold, “politically incorrect” pronouncements. That sort of thing. The same hackneyed shtick we get from all the wanna-be Howard Sterns who function mostly as a helpful red flag for single women trying to date men in any American city. (“How’d it go?” “He told me I had to hear the latest Joe Rogan podcast.” “Eww, sorry.”)

Muller is a part of this story, though, because he was a part of the church. He helped “bring down” Harvest Bible Chapel’s pastor, James MacDonald, because he knew MacDonald — he was even baptized by the pastor in the Jordan River during a church-sponsored trip to the West Bank and Israel. (Although I doubt the church ever allowed the words “West Bank” to be used in reference to that trip.)

The earlier friendship between a white-evangelical mega-church pastor and a “Morning Madhouse” shock-jock might seem surprising until you realize that MacDonald is the author of books with titles like “40 Days to Biblical Manhood” and “Act Like Men: The Bible Study.” So, you know, they’ve got that shared resentful fear that patriarchy might be losing its grip. Toxic masculinity makes strange bedfellows.

Anyway, Muller and MacDonald fell out, and the radio host eventually played recordings on his show of Pastor MacDonald describing his critics and perceived enemies in terms that sound like, well, the way a third-rate radio shock-jock would talk:

In February, Muller escalated his crusade by airing clips on his show that seemed to capture MacDonald privately insulting his perceived enemies in terms that would be shocking to his followers — though not, perhaps, to Muller’s own listeners. The voice in the clips refers to the idea of planting child pornography on the computer of Christianity Today CEO Harold Smith in retaliation for the magazine’s coverage of him. It calls the magazine’s editor in chief, Mark Galli, a “certifiable prick,” and jokes that Galli and Julie Roys had an affair. (Roys firmly denies this on her blog and calls the joke “disgusting.”) It calls the magazine an “Anglican, pseudo-dignity, high church, symphony-adoring, pipe organ-protecting, musty, mild smell of urine, blue-haired Methodist-loving, mainline-dying, women preacher-championing, emerging church-adoring, almost good with all gays and closet Palestine-promoting Christianity.” Parsing those epithets would make a decent master’s thesis on contemporary American evangelicalism.

Is it transparently disingenuous for a “shock jock” to feign indignation at such “politically incorrect” language? Yes, obviously. Is it nakedly bogus for the sometime star of a D-level reality TV show called God, Guns & Automobiles to express a sense of betrayal over learning that his pastor wants to own a bigger, shinier motorcycle? Of course. “But that’s not the most blatantly disingenuous part of this story.

While I can’t begin to parse all of those epithets, let’s just boil them down to the main points. MacDonald thinks that so-called “mainstream” white evangelicals represented by Christianity Today are indistinguishable from the mainline Protestants he considers liberal apostates. He says they are insufficiently harsh in their opposition to “gays” and insufficiently dismissive of the concerns of Palestinians.

These are all sentiments that World magazine and its “investigative journalists” agree with completely. They might never use language like “certifiable prick,” but they wholeheartedly agree with MacDonald’s belief that Christianity Today and all of its writers and editors are a bunch of squishy liberals whose “biblical manhood” isn’t as firm as their own. (Ahem.) They will frame this in more sanctimoniously pious language than MacDonald did, with heapings of performative faux lamentation, but it really wouldn’t take much editing to turn his rant into an otherwise unremarkable World-magazine op-ed piece.

We should note here, as we always do, that Christianity Today is a publication that wants you to know it believes gay and lesbian couples are “destructive to society.” That was a phrase written four years ago by its editor, Mark Galli, in response to critics like MacDonald who were then suggesting that — secretly, imperceptibly somehow — the magazine was “almost good with all gays.” It’s typical of the way CT always responds to its critics from the far-right — by reciting a categorical affirmation of whatever “stance” the right-wingers have accused them of being squishy on, accompanied by a not always convincing “Grrr! Argh! So there!”

And like most of the white-evangelical “mainstream” establishment, CT spends probably about a third of its time and energy responding to such far-right critics. This must surely be as frustrating for them as it is for their readers, since I can’t think of anything more pointlessly futile than spending so much time and energy trying to appease people who will, by definition, never be appeased, or trying to win the approval of people whose whole purpose, identity, and business model is based on never approving of you.

One consequence of that is that you wind up spending so much time saying what you weren’t saying that you no longer have time to say anything else. You spend so much time saying what you’re not that everyone — including you — starts to forget what you are. And so you cease to be anything other than a perpetual target of, and response to, bad-faith right-wing critics.

All of which is why I’ve been using those quotation marks around the word “mainstream” — as in Christianity Today and the “mainstream” white-evangelical establishment. These days, the mainstream of white evangelicalism is no longer represented by graying institutions like CT. It’s represented by right-wing bloggers, corrupt mega-church pastors, radio hosts, and thoroughly politicized rags like World and Charisma.

The shock jocks are in charge now and the “mainstream” is whatever they say it is.

If you want to understand the current role and state of the former white evangelical “mainstream,” look again at that photo above from the late Billy Graham’s 95th birthday “celebration.” Graham is the old guy in the middle, the one whose confused scowl almost seems to recognize that he has been replaced and eclipsed by the smiling faces that surround him.

Just look at that photo. It’s all right there.

evangelicals

Christianity Today

church

Previous Post

March 1, 2019

LBCF, No. 225: 'An approved wanton'

Next Post

March 6, 2019 Take it, it's yours

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "Naphtali" mean in Hebrew?

Select your answer to see how you score.

God is my rock My struggle Chosen One The Lord is my strength