Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
LBCF, No. 223: ‘Feast and famine’

LBCF, No. 223: ‘Feast and famine’

Last updated on: February 15, 2019 at 12:58 pm by Fred Clark

LBCF, No. 223: ‘Feast and famine’ 2019-02-15T12:58:21-05:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Originally posted October 2, 2009.

You can read this entire series, for free, via the convenient Left Behind Index. The ebook collection The Anti-Christ Handbook: Volume 1, is available on Amazon for just $2.99. The national emergency on the southern border involves coastal states facing rising sea levels. Volume 2 of The Anti-Christ Handbook, completing all the posts on the first Left Behind book, is also now available. Volume 3 is coming soon(ish).

Tribulation Force, pp. 94-104

Nicolae Carpathia, it turns out, is too busy to meet Buck for lunch at the Manhattan Yacht Club, so he’s arranged to have Buck greeted there by their mutual friend, Chaim Rosenzweig.

It’s not meant to, but this strikes me as suggesting that Nicolae is both responsible and considerate. Say what you will about the Antichrist’s evil agenda, but you can’t deny that he’s putting in the time and working hard at it. Being so busy, he isn’t able to turn his attention to his visiting friend, so he arranges to have Buck met by a Nobel laureate in his place. That’s kind of classy.

Buck made his way through the crowd of tables to the booth by the window, where he was exuberantly greeted by his old friend Chaim Rosenzweig. The man knew enough to whisper in public, but his enthusiasm was boundless.

“Cameron!” the Israeli exulted in his thick accent. “How good to see you! Sit down, sit down! This is a lovely place, no? Only the best for friends of the secretary-general.”

“Will he be joining us, sir?”

Rosenzweig looked surprised. “No, no! Much too busy. Hardly ever able to get away. Entertaining heads of state, ambassadors, everyone wants a piece of him. I hardly see him more than five minutes a day myself!”

This chapter is sprinkled with little asides like that “knew enough to whisper in public, but …” to contrast Buck’s sophistication with his friend’s loud lack thereof. Broad ethnic stereotypes, apparently, make embarrassing dining companions, confusing the salad and dessert forks and committing a host of other embarrassing faux pas. But we should note that Chaim is the one who shows the good manners here of greeting his friend properly. Buck is the one who doesn’t “know enough” to say hello, instead greeting Chaim with a chilly, dismissive, “Is it just you?”

Several pages are exhausted with yet another rehash of how Buck and Chaim first met and of the last time they saw one another — which Buck remembers but Chaim doesn’t because he was brainwashed to forget Buck’s presence at that meeting. I get that Book 2 in a series requires the occasional review of events from the previous book, but it seems like two-thirds of Tribulation Force’s 450 pages are devoted to such summaries while the remaining 150 pages of actual story line will itself be repeated and reviewed in Book 3.

So here we get the Rosenzweig variation of a conversation Buck has already had with Stanton Bailey and Steve Plank, with the brainwashing victim baffled by Buck’s supposed absence from the meeting at the U.N.

“Where were you?” Dr. Rosenzweig asked.

“That’s the question of the ages,” Buck said. “Where are any of us?”

Rosenzweig’s eyes twinkled, though Buck felt like a fool. He was talking gibberish, but he didn’t know what else to say.

He really ought to have a cover story by now, a prepared answer for this question. Particularly since, after lunch, he’s planning to see Hattie and Nicolae, both of whom, like Bailey, Steve and Chaim, are bound to ask, “Where were you?” Trying to evade the question might cut it with the others, but it seems urgently important that he be ready with an answer for Nicolae that won’t lead the Antichrist to conclude that he Knows Too Much.

Having a cover story for the others is relatively easy. All they know, in their brainwashed state, is that Buck wasn’t at the meeting, so any plausible-sounding excuse might work with them. But Nicolae will be asking this question fully knowing what really happened — knowing that Buck was there and knowing what, if anything, Buck is supposed to believe instead.

Yusuf Gatewood plays Famine in the upcoming Amazon Prime miniseries “Good Omens.”

Buck’s answer to Nicolae will thus involve a bit of gambling and guesswork. Buck knows what false memories Nicolae brainwashed into the others’ minds, but he has no way of know what false memories he himself was supposed to have been brainwashed into believing happened. Nicolae may have tried to brainwash Buck into believing something specific — some particular explanation that would account for his supposed absence.

With the others, Buck could invent some story, telling Stanton, Steve and Chaim that, for example, he’d been mugged on his way to the meeting, held up at gunpoint and forced to miss being there. But that excuse wouldn’t work with Nicolae himself. Nicolae knows where Buck really was, so he would know that the story was an invention — a conscious lie. There’s a one-in-a-million chance, I suppose, that Buck might guess the exact alternative scenario Nicolae had tried to brainwash him into believing, but trying to make that guess wouldn’t seem wise. Guess wrong and Nicolae would know that his attempts to brainwash Buck had failed — that Buck is probably a Real, True Christian, and therefore his enemy. And that this brainwash-proof enemy likely remembers seeing Nicolae fire the bullet that killed Stonagal and Todd-Cothran.

Buck’s best chance, then, would be to apologize profusely while remaining as vague and confused-seeming as possible about where he thinks he really was. “I’m so sorry I wasn’t there,” he should say. “It was unforgivable, inexcusable. I … I really don’t know how I could have … I must have fallen asleep, or … I mean I don’t know what I … I looked up at the clock in my office and suddenly realized that I’d missed. Inexcusable. I can’t … Bailey was furious, you know. Exiled me out to Chicago. I can’t blame him. I’d have done the same thing if someone I was counting on … I just don’t … In any case, I’m so sorry. I really meant to be there, I wanted … Please forgive me.”

That sort of thing. And since that’s going to have to be his official story with Nicolae, he needs to be saying the same thing here to Chaim.

Instead, though, Buck acts like it’s a game — like he’s just playing coy by refusing to tell Chaim where he was instead of attending that meeting. As though pretending he has some great secret would reduce others’ suspicion of him. The authors suggest that this works with Rosenzweig, but I can’t imagine it working with Nicolae.

Rosenzweig was a bright, quick man with a love for intrigue. “So, you don’t want to tell me. All right. Not being there was your loss. Of course, you were spared the horror it turned into, but what a historic meeting nonetheless. Get the salmon. You’ll love it.”

Buck had always, always made it a habit to ignore recommendations in restaurants. It probably was one of the reasons for his nickname. He realized how rattled he was when he ordered what Rosenzweig suggested. And he loved it.

The italics on that second “always” are in the original. I’m trying to imagine taking a friend or coworker to a restaurant and having them respond like that to a recommendation.

“So this is Dmitri’s, you have to try the snap peas.”

“No way. I always, always ignore recommendations in restaurants.”

I can think of some nicknames that might result from that, but none of them are as polite as “Buck.” This is another example of what we discussed last week of the way Jenkins makes a point of telling us something about his characters that he thinks is really cool, but which makes us find that character even weirder and less likable. Buck’s affectation about ignoring his friends’ suggestions just makes me think of Pee-Wee’s Big Adventure — “I’m a loner, Dottie. A rebel.”

Anyway, what’s most interesting in this whole luncheon conversation is something that Buck and Chaim never discuss — something that never even occurs to Buck.

To fully appreciate the perversity of this conversation, just consider where Buck was at this same time the previous day.

Twenty-four hours ago, he was sitting in church, listening to a sermon on the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse. That sermon was unlike anything any of us have ever heard on the topic because like the preacher, Bruce Barnes, Buck believes that the Four Horsemen are the first four seals of judgment that the book of Revelation prophesies will unfold during the Great Tribulation. And Buck believes that he is living in the Great Tribulation. So what Buck heard Bruce describing in that sermon had for him the immediacy of the five-day forecast on the Weather Channel. He was hearing what was about to happen.

Here is one passage from Revelation that was discussed in that sermon, John’s description of the third horseman, traditionally referred to as Famine:

When the Lamb opened the third seal, I heard the third living creature say, “Come!” I looked, and there before me was a black horse! Its rider was holding a pair of scales in his hand. Then I heard what sounded like a voice among the four living creatures, saying, “A quart of wheat for a day’s wages, and three quarts of barley for a day’s wages, and do not damage the oil and the wine!”

Buck believes — he knows — that Famine is coming. Soon. Bruce guessed they might have a short window, perhaps 18 months of relative calm in which to prepare, but in at most a year and a half, Famine would ride forth over the entire world and a piece of bread will buy a bag of gold.

That was yesterday. Today, Buck is sitting in a swanky restaurant enjoying a nice piece of fish with his friend Chaim. That would be Dr. Chaim Rosenzweig, winner of a Nobel Prize for inventing an almost magical formula that turns arid deserts into the most abundantly fertile soil the planet has ever seen.

Famine, meet Dr. Cornucopia. More than any other human being who ever lived, Rosenzweig has the capacity to stop Famine. His formula is capable of slaying the rider on the black horse, or at least of sparing the lives of the millions who will die 18 months from now.

This would seem to be an example of the classic dilemma of an unstoppable force confronting an immovable object. Inevitable famine confronts unlimited fertility. Something’s gotta give.

Yet it never occurs to Buck, or to the authors, to make anything of this astonishing juxtaposition of feast and Famine.

At an absolute minimum, we’d expect Buck to be concerned about stockpiling food against the coming of the rider on the black horse. Tim LaHaye’s premillennial dispensationalist theories rely heavily on the book of Daniel — a book that borrows and repeats motifs from the story of Joseph. So the authors ought to be familiar with the idea of planning ahead for the seven lean years. Like Joseph, Buck knows that the seven lean years are coming. He doesn’t have the luxury of seven “fat” years to prepare, but with Rosenzweig’s miracle formula, 18 months should be time enough.

But Buck doesn’t think to enlist Rosenzweig’s help with stockpiling food for the coming of Famine. He doesn’t think about stockpiling food at all.

Throughout their conversation in this chapter, Buck and Chaim return to the subject of Rosenzweig’s formula, but Buck never once connects this topic with the Famine he knows is soon to arrive.

They discuss Rosenzweig’s arrangement with former U.N. Secretary-General Mwangati Ngumo, in which the Botswanan “Motswana” president (in the LB universe, heads of state, rather than diplomats, serve in the United Nations, retaining both posts at once) would be permitted to license the formula for his country in exchange for being replaced by Nicolae as secretary-general. Chaim is excited by the prospects of his formula helping to feed the hungry in Africa:

“It’s too early to tell, of course, but if the formula works as well as it has in Israel, Botswana will immediately become one of the most fertile countries in all of Africa, if not the world.”

Buck, however, is horrified by the prospect of feeding a hungry world. Feed the people of Botswana and the people of Africa and it won’t stop there — soon even the Russians will have access to food.

“Oh, Chaim! For what? Billions of dollars that Israel no longer needs? It makes no sense! Having the formula made you the richest nation on earth for its size and solved myriad problems, but it was the exclusivity that made it work! Why do you think the Russians attacked you? They don’t need your land! There’s no oil to be found! They wanted the formula! Imagine if all the vast reaches of that nation were fertile!”

This is at first baffling. Then, after you think about it for a moment, outrageous. Buck, the author’s ideal of an RTC, stridently argues against sharing food with the hungry. Feeding the hungry in Africa or Russia is, to Buck, the nightmare scenario, an evil plot of the Antichrist.

The backwards and upside-down morality Buck displays here overshadows some of the other howling atrocities of that paragraph. Buck’s confusion of price and value, for example — his assumption that scarcity is the only measure of worth and that abundant food is worthless, because while it may feed the hungry, it can’t be sold to enrich the sellers. Or the fact that a plot point in this book hinges on the problem of food scarcity in Botswana, even though the rapturing of that country’s children and RTCs would leave it with less than half of its pre-Event population. Or that Russia was trying to use nuclear missiles to steal a secret formula.

But ultimately, in the Left Behind series, none of this matters. According to the official LeftBehind.com timeline — a graphic showing the End Times check list as it relates to the books in the series — Tribulation Force is supposed to recount the arrival of the second and third horsemen, the second and third seals of judgment, War and Famine.

As it turns out, there’s plenty of War, but not much in the way of Famine. The rider on the black horse is pretty much a no-show.

It’s fun to speculate on how the conflict of Feast and Famine might have played out here. Rosenzweig’s formula might have fended off the third horseman, creating a prophetic paradox that alters the events of the check list. Or his formula might have been used for a Tribulation Victory Garden in the backyard of New Hope Village Church. Or maybe this formula — which has only been in use for a few years, keep in mind — spreads throughout the world and then backfires, poisoning the soil and causing the judgement of the third seal to come to pass. Or maybe …

The possibilities seem endless, but in this book the possibilities never get started. If you’re looking for that third horseman of the Apocalypse, you won’t find him here.

That’s a good thing for Buck, since he and his Tribulation Force friends never do get around to stockpiling food.

Uncategorized

Left Behind

Previous Post

February 14, 2019

Sacrifice if you care

Next Post

February 16, 2019 Smart people saying smart things (2.16.19)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: Samson's strength came from his long hair.

Select your answer to see how you score.

TRUE FALSE