Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
It’s too soon to tell

It’s too soon to tell

Last updated on: January 10, 2019 at 4:09 pm by Fred Clark

It’s too soon to tell 2019-01-10T16:09:49-05:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

There’s a story — maybe more of a legend* — involving the Chinese Communist leader Zhou Enlai, who was asked in the 1970s what he thought of the French Revolution of 1789. Zhou replied, “It is too soon to say.”

That’s how I feel about two big recent stories from the white evangelical world, both of which might one day be regarded as positive “first steps.” But unless and until further steps are taken, we can’t be sure that’s what they are.

That’s the thing about first steps, after all. Their meaning and significance depends on whether or not there are subsequent steps, and what those steps look like. Without such additional following steps, even the best-seeming “first step” may mean next to nothing.

It’s like the difference between “John quit smoking on Saturday” and “John quits smoking on Saturdays.” The former might be a true first step. It might be big news, indicating a major positive change in John’s life. But the latter would tell us, instead, that nothing in John’s life is really changing at all. To the extent that it’s news, it’s bad news — the news that our friend John is stuck on a treadmill, trapped forever walking in place in an endless loop of meaningless “first steps.”

“It’s a positive first step.” (Wikimedia photo of Princess by Aaron Denunzio)

That’s why it can be difficult to know how to respond to such stories. Celebrating first steps can be a way of encouraging positive change — a way of reinforcing positive actions and thereby of making it more likely that those additional subsequent steps will be taken. But if we celebrate with John every Saturday when he repeats the same pretense of a first step, then all we end up encouraging for him is the meaningless ritual of empty words that will ultimately ensure he never takes any subsequent steps.

The other factor here, I think, is how well you know “John.” If you don’t know him at all, then hearing someone tell you, “Hey, John quit smoking on Saturday” will most likely seem as unambiguously hopeful and positive news. “Good for John,” you’ll think, wishing him well.

But if you and John go way back, and you’ve seen this happen many, many times before, then you’re bound to be a bit more skeptical on hearing this news. That skepticism will be appropriate — well-earned, well-deserved, and perfectly fair. You’ll think it still possible, in theory, that this might be hopeful and positive news. That could still turn out to be true, maybe. But if you know that this isn’t John’s first first step — that he’s taken so many false first steps that you’ve lost count — then based on that evidence and experience you’ll think it’s far likelier that this latest “first step” won’t mean anything either. You’ll expect that a few months from now, or a few years from now, you’ll find John exactly where he’s always been, exactly how he’s always been, unmoved and unchanged.

All of which is why I’ve struggled with responding to these two stories that might some day prove to have been positive first steps. I hope that’s true. But it’s too soon to tell.

The first such story comes from Louisville, “Southern Baptist seminary report ties founders to slaveholding, white supremacy“:

A 71-page report released [Dec. 12] from Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, the Southern Baptist Convention’s flagship seminary, says its early trustees and faculty “defended the righteousness of slaveholding.”

“They argued first that slaveholding was righteous because the inferiority of blacks indicated God’s providential will for their enslavement, corroborated by Noah’s prophetic cursing of Ham,” the report reads. “They argued second that slaveholding was righteous because southern slaves accrued such remarkable material and spiritual benefits from it.”

The seminary was founded in 1859 in Greenville, S.C., but suspended operations in 1862 during the Civil War and reopened in Louisville in 1877.

The Southern Baptist Convention was founded in 1845 when its members defended the right of missionaries to own slaves. Southern Seminary President R. Albert Mohler Jr. told Religion News Service the investigation expanded the knowledge and truth of what that defense meant.

“What we did not know and should have known was the degree to which open expressions of white racial supremacy were a part of the defense of slavery even on the part of some of the founding faculty of this school,” he said.

… “This report documents the contradictions and complexities of the experience of Southern Baptists and race in America,” it reads. “We have not overcome all the contradictions, but we are committed to doing so.”

The second such story comes from Wheaton, “At Wheaton summit, prominent evangelicals share stories of sexual abuse“:

[Beth] Moore was a featured speaker at a one-day summit on sexual abuse and harassment [Dec. 13] at Wheaton College in suburban Chicago — and one of many who described their own experiences of abuse and harassment.

Some shared their stories of sexual abuse for the first time, including bestselling Christian author and pastor Max Lucado and child advocate Kelly Rosati.

“We’re trying to help amplify a conversation others have started,” said Ed Stetzer, executive director of the Billy Graham Center at Wheaton, which organized the summit.

Evangelicals have not always done a good job of listening to survivors, Stetzer told attendees at the summit, and “we want to do better.”

Both of these stories include the language of first steps: “We want to do better,” “We are committed to doing so.” But to be credible, that language needs to be followed by the tangible evidence of second steps, and of third steps.

Until then …

– – – – – – – – – – – –

* Zhou was being interviewed through a translator and may have thought the question was about protests in France that same year, which would have made his response merely accurate and prudent rather than, like, whoa, kind of deep, man.

Previous Post

January 7, 2019

And we're not through yet

Next Post

January 11, 2019 LBCF, No. 218: 'Irreconcilable differences'

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month November 2026 October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What Christian group follows the "Three Self Principle" in church governance?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Seventh-day Adventists Quakers Chinese Protestant Churches Orthodox Christians