Today in Satan

Last updated on: November 28, 2018 at 8:51 pm by Fred Clark

Today in Satan 2018-11-28T20:51:04-05:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

• I’ve lost track of the layers and players involved in the recent legal dispute between Warner Brothers studio, producers of The Chilling Adventures of Sabrina, and the Satanic Temple. The Temple sued the show due to its featuring a Baphomet-style statue that looks an awful lot like its own trademark statue.

So on the one hand we have a TV show that’s nominally about Satan-worshipping witches, but which uses that setting as a funhouse-mirror lens for exploring organized religion in general and Christian churches in particular. On the other hand is a nominally Satanic “church” that specializes in theatrically disruptive spectacles that it uses to critique organized religion in general and the quasi-established hegemony of Christian churches in particular. And at issue between them is the design of a statue which, in turn, is based on a centuries-old imaginary deity — Baphomet — who was invented by inquisitors as something to accuse their political enemies of worshipping. (Yes, I realize many people consider all deities to be imaginary. But I don’t mean that Baphomet itself is imaginary, I mean that its worshippers are. No such worshippers ever existed.)

So we’ve got a whole bunch of symbols that mean several things at once and different creative people using that shared imagery in different ways to make somewhat similar points.

Part of the conflict, I think, has to do with how many layers of irony one ought to employ in reimagining or reclaiming the imagery of Baphomet and/or Satan. Both the Sabrina creators and the Temple approach these with multiple layers of irony, but the show involves an even number of them while the Temple prefers an odd number. (I think — as I said, I’ve lost track of the layers here.)

Anyway, the suit has been “amicably” settled.

• Speaking of the Satanic Temple getting ripped off: People keep stealing ornaments off of their holiday tree in San Jose’s “Christmas in the Park” display. It’s probably not malicious vandalism or even the kind of prank that results in the annual theft of the baby Jesus from the event’s Nativity scene. It seems people just like their ornaments because, well, they’re kind of cool.

• Christmas displays in the park are one beloved, long-running American ritual. Here’s another: “Texas Venue Defends Ghost From Horrified Pastor.” Ghost is a Swedish band that specializes in the kind of performances designed to horrify Texas pastors. The pastor in question runs the kind of church that exists primarily to be horrified by Swedish heavy metal bands. It’s so nice that they found each other — there’s a lid for every pot.

• For the second year in a row, the Google news alert in my RSS feed for the word “Satanic” has produced a remarkable number of news stories involving Melania Trump’s holiday decor for the White House. There’s maybe a fine line between holly-berry red and gory bloody red, but the effect is striking. (I like it more than last year’s Jadis-ruling-over-Narnia theme.)

• “Is Celine Dion Working With the Devil?”

Msgr. John Esseff says the singer is nefariously serving the Evil One by undermining the patriarchy with her new line of gender-neutral onesies for infants. Esseff was quoted in a piece from the right-wing National Catholic Register — a publication with the ethics you’d expect from a rag whose whole shtick is trying to trick readers into thinking they’re reading legitimate journalism from the National Catholic Reporter. (Think of the Register-Not-Reporter as the Catholic equivalent of a Texas pastor perpetually railing against Scandinavian metal bands.)

Who is John Esseff? Well, he’s an exorcist and the founder of a training academy for exorcists. He’s Bob Larson, basically, but in purple. The faux-NCR seems to think Esseff is credible because he’s also a monsignor in the Diocese of Scranton.

All that proves, though, is that Esseff is an utterly clueless and incompetent exorcist. The Pennsylvania grand jury report released earlier this year identified 59 priests from the Diocese of Scranton as sexual abusers of children — 59! Esseff was silent for years while dozens of predator priests served in his diocese, but now at last he’s speaking up … in order to condemn a new clothing line from Celine Dion. I would not hire this man to identify and exorcise the presence of evil. He can’t reliably do either.

• The Fort Morgan (Colo.) Times just finished a fun series bylined by the small-town paper’s “Community History Writers.” I like the idea of that — using the paper as a means of preserving and recording a community’s memory.

I also enjoyed the long story itself, the gist of which can be gleaned from the headlines of its six parts:

Scully gets the last word, but there’s a good bit of Mulder in there too.

Previous Post

November 26, 2018

Without him you're toast

Next Post

November 29, 2018 Postcards from the class & culture wars (11.29.18)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

According to 2 Peter, what is the Lord not slow in keeping?

Select your answer to see how you score.

His promise His commandments His mercy His judgment