Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
Power and pow’r

Power and pow’r

Last updated on: October 23, 2018 at 4:30 pm by Fred Clark

Power and pow’r 2018-10-23T16:30:46-04:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Richard Beck has me revisiting some bloody hymns.

“I know these blood-themed hymns are currently out of favor,” he writes. “They are theologically ‘problematic’ for many.”

Well, yes. But the biggest problem with some of them is that they’re not a much bigger problem.

Let’s look at my favorite of the bunch — “Power in the Blood.” This is such a well-known and well-loved hymn that Michael Gerson and George W. Bush worked into into a classic dog-whistle for Bush’s white evangelical base: “There is power — wonder-working power — in the goodness and idealism and faith of the American people.”

The hymn was written by Lewis E. Jones and first published in 1899. It’s soaked in biblical imagery. But Jones was a graduate of Moody Bible Institute, so that biblical imagery is all wrenched weirdly out of context, conscripted into service of something very different, and repurposed to mean something far, far different from what the original scriptures meant.

Start at the beginning, with the first verse and the chorus:

Would you be free from the burden of sin?
There’s power in the blood, power in the blood;
Would you o’er evil a victory win?
There’s wonderful power in the blood.

There is power, power, wonder-working power
In the blood of the Lamb.
There is power, power, wonder-working power
In the precious blood of the Lamb.

I love singing all of that. You can slow it down reverently, or you can crank it up and do that campfire sing-along thing where you try to stick as many “pow’rs” as possible into the first and third lines of the chorus without tripping up the rhythm. (For those new to this song, the only thing you can’t or shouldn’t do when singing it is pronounce “power” as more than one syllable.)

And the theology here — as written — is terrific. Albeit also terrifying. It’s straight out of the Bible. You’ve got your people being crushed under a burden of sin and longing for a victory over evil, and you’ve got your promise of deliverance and salvation for those people “in the precious blood of the Lamb.”

Where in the Bible do we find all this? Two places, mainly. The big one is from the book of Revelation — that’s where you have to turn when you’re dealing with a capital-L Lamb. The Lamb That Was Slain is the deus ex machina hero of Revelation. The Lamb is the opposition, the only alternative, and the ultimate conqueror of the Beast, whose empire of sin and oppression defines life for everyone trapped within and beneath his beastly, imperial “burden of sin.”

The Beast — the enemy and counterpart of the Lamb — is portrayed in Revelation as something like the second coming of Pharaoh, and John’s Apocalypse portrays the Beast being overthrown by something like wave upon wave of the Plagues of Egypt.

That story, of course, is the other main place in the Bible that we encounter a story like the one Lewis Jones has had us singing for the past century. The people of Israel were not free, they were trapped under the burden of sin, crushed by an evil they were powerless to resist. Their salvation came through the wonder-working power of God, who plagued Pharaoh with a host of opportunities to relent before ultimately sending an angel of death to settle the matter with some finality. Death visited all of those who were part of the imperial system that made up the crushing burden of sin, but the people of Israel were spared because the angel of death passed over the homes of those who painted their doorways with — yes — the precious blood of a lamb.

These stories — the Apocalypse and the Exodus — are bloody, bloody stories. Such blood-themed, blood-soaked tales of liberation and salvation are, as Beck says, “currently out of favor” for most white Christians because we’ve accustomed and accommodated ourselves to life under Pharaoh and the Beast. White American Christianity is Vichy Christianity. We’ve built ourselves nice homes here under the burden of sin, and burning that all down so we can go off to live in tents eating manna doesn’t seem like an improvement in our situation.

“Would you o’er evil a victory win?” Well, look, evil and I have an arrangement*, let’s not go creating conflict …*

But of course none of this is what Beck means when he talks about this hymn being viewed as “theologically problematic.” Because none of this is what Lewis E. Jones meant despite the fact that it’s the only meaning afforded or allowed by the passages he explicitly cites in his hymn. And none of it is what white Christians have understood the hymn to mean as they have sung it here in America for the past hundred years.

The “problematic” aspects of this bloody hymn Beck refers to are the ways it is understood to teach “penal substitutionary atonement,” twisting all of that stuff about Pharaoh and the Beast into nothing more than a milquetoast metaphor for an exclusively individual and exclusively individualistic, otherworldly “salvation” that is utterly pow’rless to change anything or to mean anything in this world.

The burden of sin? That’s just a metaphor. Victory o’er evil? Also just a metaphor. The Lamb that was slain? The Beast? Pharaoh? Just more metaphors — more flaccid, impotent metaphors for something not imagined or discussed in any of the passages Jones’ hymn directly cites.

Consider the third verse of this hymn:

Would you be whiter, much whiter than snow?
There’s power in the blood, power in the blood;
Sin stains are lost in its life giving flow;
There’s wonderful power in the blood.

Doesn’t that refer to a biblical promise of individual deliverance from the stain of sin? Isn’t that what the Bible says in the passages Jones alludes to here?

Though your sins are like scarlet,
they shall be like snow;
though they are red like crimson,
they shall become like wool.

Well, let’s look at that passage in full. It should be a familiar one for American readers because it was a favorite passage of Frederick Douglass, who is being recognized more and more for the great work he is doing. It’s from Isaiah 1:18, so come now, let us argue out the full passage.

“Ah, sinful nation, people laden with iniquity” God says here. There’s your burden of sin. Would you be free from the burden of sin? In Isaiah 1, God explains how that can happen. But first God explains how that won’t happen:

What to me is the multitude of your sacrifices?
says the Lord;
I have had enough of burnt offerings of rams
and the fat of fed beasts;
I do not delight in the blood of bulls,
or of lambs, or of goats.
When you come to appear before me,
who asked this from your hand?
Trample my courts no more;
bringing offerings is futile;
incense is an abomination to me.
New moon and sabbath and calling of convocation—
I cannot endure solemn assemblies with iniquity.

Your new moons and your appointed festivals
my soul hates;
they have become a burden to me,
I am weary of bearing them.
When you stretch out your hands,
I will hide my eyes from you;
even though you make many prayers,
I will not listen;
your hands are full of blood.

To be fair, we could turn to many biblical passages that can be read to make a case for something very much like the abstract theological theory of “penal substitutionary atonement.” But this ain’t one of them.

This passage in Isaiah addresses that idea directly and, in the voice of God, describes the whole idea as exasperatingly beside the point. (“Who asked for this?” God says. “Where did you get the idea that this was what I wanted?”)

In Isaiah 1, it is God who finds all this blood and bloody imagery “problematic.” The blood of lambs, God says, is not delightful to God.

So if God isn’t out for blood, then what does God want? We’ve got God talking here, God personally and directly answering our personal and direct question: Would you be free from the burden of sin?

What is God’s answer?

Wash yourselves; make yourselves clean;
remove the evil of your doings
from before my eyes;
cease to do evil,
learn to do good;
seek justice,
rescue the oppressed,
defend the orphan,
plead for the widow.
Come now, let us argue it out,
says the Lord:
though your sins are like scarlet,
they shall be like snow;
though they are red like crimson,
they shall become like wool.

Step back and squint. Move closer and inspect each word. Rub your eyes for a bit and then read them all again. But try as you might, you won’t find any way to make this passage mean what this hymn seems to want it to mean. “Seek justice” is not a metaphor. The oppressed, the orphan and the widow are not metaphors here for the crippling burden of personal sin in your personal life.

Richard Beck notes that this song is particularly moving for the incarcerated men he meets and sings and fellowships with. “They live in a world of blood. And these songs speak to them.”

This song should speak to us Vichy Christians as well, but what it ought to say to us shouldn’t be nearly as reassuring.

Let’s close with a different hymn — a song we never refer to as a hymn even though the title seems perfectly apt. This is a hymn that visits all of those same biblical passages — Pharaoh and the Beast and the words of God’s own mouth in Isaiah 1. But this song lets those passages say what they say and mean what they surely mean.

Would you be free from the burden of sin? Listen to Nina Simone.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

October 23, 2018

Tuesday morning open thread

Next Post

October 24, 2018 Maybe baby that somebody is you

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month November 2026 October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What natural disaster did God use to destroy the earth in Noah’s time?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Earthquake Fire Famine Flood