Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
LBCF, No. 205: ‘Bible studies’

LBCF, No. 205: ‘Bible studies’

Last updated on: October 12, 2018 at 3:23 pm by Fred Clark

LBCF, No. 205: ‘Bible studies’ 2018-10-12T15:23:24-04:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Originally posted May 15, 2009.

You can read this entire series, for free, via the convenient Left Behind Index. The ebook collection The Anti-Christ Handbook: Volume 1, is available on Amazon for just $2.99. Vote to protect the right to vote. Volume 2 of The Anti-Christ Handbook, completing all the posts on the first Left Behind book, is also now available. Volume 3 is coming soon(ish).

Tribulation Force, pp. 38-43

Chloe Steele is smitten with Buck Williams. Lest we judge her too harshly for this, keep in mind that unlike the reader, she’s never witnessed him in Buck-the-Player mode, working his charms on Hattie or Alice, and she’s never seen him as Buck-the-D-bag smirking behind the back of his female boss.

Like Buck, Chloe is aware that the End of the World is not the most auspicious time to begin a relationship:

“Sitting here talking about my love life, or lack of it, seems pretty juvenile at this point in history, don’t you think?”

Having read the back cover of the book, Chloe knows she’s in a PMD apocalypse novel, and thus she considers a pragmatic approach to that predicament:

“It’s not like there’s nothing to fill my time even if I don’t go back to school. I want to memorize Ezekiel, Daniel and Revelation for starters.”

Rayford laughed. “You’re kidding.”

“Of course! But you know what I mean, Dad? I never would have dreamed the Bible would even interest me, but now I’m reading it like there’s no tomorrow.”

Rayford fell silent, and he could tell Chloe was struck by her own unintentional irony. … “There aren’t many tomorrows left, are there?”

I might like these characters a bit more if they occasionally expressed a hint of intentional irony. (If I were in their shoes, I don’t think seven years would be enough time for “Hey, it’s not the end of the world …” jokes to ever get old.) A lack of appreciation for irony is often considered a mark of innocence, but I can’t fully trust someone who seems unable to appreciate or savor irony. That strikes me as a sign of a dangerous lack of perspective.

It’s too bad Chloe was kidding about her plan to memorize “Ezekiel, Daniel and Revelation for starters.” That plan shows good instincts — heading upstream for the most primary sources available is normally the best approach.

In the case of premillennial dispensationalism, however, such unmediated contact with the supposed primary source material would only be confusing. Without prior knowledge of the PMD mythology, there’s no way anyone could read those books of the Bible and arrive at anything like it’s intricately convoluted framework. The only way such a course of study might be helpful in understanding the PMD apocalypse would be if Chloe memorized them from a Scofield Bible — not the text itself, just the footnotes.

The Bible, actually, is not a primary source for PMD eschatology. Pieces of it — chapters, verses, words, syllables — provide a portion of the raw material that people like Scofield, Tim LaHaye or Hal Lindsay then combine with other ingredients to create, through textual alchemy, their finished product. But PMD eschatology is not found in, and does not come from, the Bible.

Consider just the events of our story so far. Russia destroys itself in an otherwise harmless nuclear attack on Israel. Every child on earth disappears, along with adults who are a very particular sort of Christian. Two men with guns trip and die while heckling two street preachers in Jerusalem. The pacifist president of Romania takes over the world, except for Israel, with whom he signs a peace treaty. Unless you were already steeped in the mythology and through-the-looking-glass logic of “Bible prophecy” delirium, you’d never guess that these events were meant to correspond to the Bible passages that LaHaye says they “fulfill.”

Or consider this sequence of events and see if you can find any rationale for reading the Bible in that particular order:

1. Turn to Ezekiel 38 & 39. Don’t read the first 37 chapters of Ezekiel, they don’t matter. And don’t read Ezekiel chapters 40 to 48 — they don’t matter either. You’re supposed to start reading Ezekiel at Chapter 38. That’s obviously why it’s Chapter 38.

2. Turn from Ezekiel 39 to 1 Thessalonians 4:16, being very careful not to read verses 13 and 14 of this chapter. (Those verses introduce the section that follows as being about death, hope and grieving and you’re going to have to try, instead, to read this section as though it is about the disappearance of all of the earth’s children, which it doesn’t actually mention.) Anyway, read on through the 11th verse of the following chapter and then jump to the obvious next passage in the plainest, most literal and logical reading of the Bible …

3. Revelation Chapter 11. Don’t read the first 10 chapters of Revelation — not yet. First finish Chapter 11, then turn to …

4. Revelation 6:1-2. Don’t read the third verse yet, because first you need to turn to …

5. The ninth chapter of Daniel. Skip the first 19 verses and start with Daniel 9:20.

If Chloe did, in fact, memorize Ezekiel, Daniel and Revelation, then this hopscotch approach to the Bible would probably strike her as even more arbitrary and irratinoal. This approach can be made to seem almost sort of somewhat semi-plausible if it’s being presented from the pulpit by a preacher who talks very fast and uses lots of distracting, authoritative-seeming PowerPoint charts, but neither Chloe nor any other reader could sit down and read Ezekiel, Daniel and Revelation and thereby conclude that such a course of events is prophesied to occur in such an order.

The Scofield/LaHaye hermeneutic: Feed Bible passages in one end and “prophecy” comes out the other.

Within the fictional world she inhabits, memorizing Revelation might still be a prudent step. LaHaye’s scheme doesn’t follow the chronology that book presents as written, but for the most part he treats all of its seals, vials, trumpets and bowls as a straight timeline of Very Bad Things that Chloe would do well to be prepared to face.

But even in her fictional context, as a character inhabiting the world created by LaHaye and Jenkins, it would still be a waste of time for Chloe to memorize Ezekiel and Daniel. Don’t get me wrong — Ezekiel is fantastic and reading it is not at all a waste of time. The dung-fires and dioramas of the trippy prophet’s street theater are unlike anything else in the Bible. Some of Ezekiel’s imagery — a wheel within a wheel, a valley of dry bones — is as indelible as it is inscrutable. But them bones them bones them dry bones would be nothing but a distraction for Chloe. That story would be no more practical during the Great Tribulation than would the story of Daniel and the Lion’s Den (or the less-popular Daniel and the Miracle Vegetarian Exile Diet).

Meanwhile, Buck is thinking of Chloe too:

Buck Williams lay on his stomach in his new bed for the first time. It felt strange. His was a nice place in a good building …

Should there still be such a thing as “a good building”? Post-Event, an apartment building would either be filled with newly vacant units from which the stink of rotting food would seep into the hallways, or else it would be a building with no empty units, i.e., a building full of sinners. I guess this is a building filled with the better sort of sinner — the quiet, considerate damned who never play their devil’s music loudly too late at night.

Like Chloe, Buck decides to do a little Bible-reading, and he too knows the short list of Prophetically Important texts he’s supposed to be studying. And yet, happily:

… he found himself turning to the Gospels rather than the Old Testament or the Revelation prophecies. What a revolutionary Jesus turned out to be. Buck was fascinated with the character, the personality, the mission of the man. The Jesus he had always imagined or thought he knew about was an impostor. The Jesus of the Bible was a radical, a man of paradoxes.

This is interesting. And promising …

Buck set the Bible on the nightstand and rolled onto his back, shielding his eyes from the light. If you want to be rich, give your money away, he told himself. That’s the gist of it. If you want to be exalted, humble yourself. Revenge sounds logical, but it’s wrong. Love your enemies, pray for those who put you down. Bizarre.

Yes! Yes it is bizarre and that is, more or less, the gist of it. By George he’s got it! Alright, now Buck, what does this mean for you as a new Christian? How does –?

His mind wandered to Chloe.

Aaaand that’s that.

Buck’s meditation upon the revolutionary, upside-down character of Christ and his kingdom evaporates as abruptly as it arose. And he never speaks or thinks of it again, never acts on it, never chooses or changes because of what it might mean.

It wasn’t an epiphany after all, merely an observation — a fleeting, half-glimpsed observation that flickered at the corner of Buck’s eye and then disappeared forever.

But what a strangely out-of-place observation that was here, from this character, in these books. Buck almost guiltily turns away from the PMD-approved “prophecy” passages and thus, for one brief moment, he is able to encounter the Jesus of the Gospels. The “gist” of Jesus’ message takes shape in Buck’s mind as almost the precise opposite of who he is and how he lives his life. The self-centered, self-aggrandizing, vindictive GIRAT summarizes that message as generosity, humility and love for enemies. And then:

… Bizarre.

His mind wandered to Chloe.

And nothing ever comes of it. Buck spends the next three pages praying about what to say to Chloe:

All he wanted to know was whether he should keep pursuing Chloe. He started praying about it, and all of a sudden he was thinking about marriage and children. Craziness. Maybe that’s how God works, he thought. He leads you to logical, or illogical, conclusions.

Buck calls her, gets stuck on the phone with Rayford instead, and then he just goes right back to acting the way we’re accustomed to seeing him: Oblivious to others, exalting himself, hating his enemies.

This is immensely frustrating. It’s like that scene in every episode of The Sopranos when Tony comes to a fork in the road and sees that redemption is possible, that redemption is available and that here, at last, is his chance to be relieved of his burden, to be released from his bondage, his chance at last to be the father, the husband and the man he has always longed to be and … and he doesn’t take it.

Except on The Sopranos that frustration was the point. Here, Buck Williams is supposed to be the good guy, the hero, a role model. To see Buck Williams offered this sudden opportunity only to shrug it away is just bewildering.

For three short paragraphs it almost seemed as though we were heading for a complete about-face. For a moment there, Buck resembles the Rev. Henry Maxwell — the hero of the only American publishing phenomenon to rival the success of the Left Behind series.

One hundred years before Jerry Jenkins started typing, Charles Sheldon wrote a similar scene in the early pages of his novel, In His Steps. The Rev. Maxwell is offered almost the same epiphany that presents itself to Buck here, but Maxwell seizes it and runs with it. “What would Jesus do?” he asks, and the startling answer, he realizes, is to be found in that paradoxical, revolutionary message of the Sermon on the Mount. Maxwell embraces that message wholeheartedly and it turns his whole world upside down until not one stone is left on another.

Buck Williams is given that chance here, but instead of taking it, he rolls onto his back and shields his eyes from the light till human voices wake him and he drowns.

I doubt that’s how I’m supposed to be reading this chapter. I don’t really think LaHaye & Jenkins intended for us to view Buck here as a spiritual J. Alfred Prufrock. But if not that, then what on earth was this scene for? Why were we shown Buck fumbling the handoff on what might have been a life-changing epiphany?

Bizarre.

Uncategorized

Left Behind

Previous Post

October 11, 2018

'They will inevitably learn and teach the wrong things'

Next Post

October 13, 2018 Halloween music: a supplemental playlist

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What Christian tradition is famous for the musical "Gregorian chant"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Methodist Roman Catholic Presbyterian Anglican