Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
I’m thinkin’ ’bout burnin’ it down, boys

I’m thinkin’ ’bout burnin’ it down, boys

Last updated on: October 11, 2018 at 1:24 pm by Fred Clark

I’m thinkin’ ’bout burnin’ it down, boys 2018-10-11T13:24:10-04:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

• Joel Baden makes a very interesting point about Cyrus and Israel, and about what people are really saying when they call for an “American Cyrus”:

When Cyrus conquered Babylon, he did not declare that he and his gods had defeated Babylon and its gods, as would have been typical at the time. Instead, he announced — not without his own brand of chutzpah — that it was the gods of Babylon who had brought him there.

By appropriating local religious beliefs, Cyrus was able to authorize his imperial domination and curry favor with the conquered peoples.

Baden argues that it wasn’t so much “Our God has raised up a foreign power to save us” as it was a foreign power convincing others that their own gods wanted them to kneel before him.

• Yes, steroids played a role in the McGwire/Sosa-era of absurd home run totals in Major League baseball. But so did liberation theology — or, rather, the backlash against liberation theology from colonialist multinational corporations.

“How Much of a Role Did Steroids Play in the Steroid Era?” Ben Lindbergh asks for the Ringer. He concedes that the players may have been juiced, but lays out the evidence that the balls were too. Most of the league thought so — arguing that the balls were more tightly wound than ever before.

They were. For decades until then, official Major League baseballs had all been hand-stitched in Haitian sweatshops. But then in late 1990, the island nation held its first democratic election, with an overwhelming number of voters supporting the former priest and liberation theologian Jean Bertrand Aristide. Multinational corporations that had operated in Haiti for years under cozy arrangement with the Duvalier dictatorships feared a backlash, and they were terrified of the soft-spoken, diminutive Aristide.

One such corporation was the parent company of Rawlings, which panicked and pulled its baseball-making operations out of Haiti, relocating to Costa Rica, where new factories and new methods produced new baseballs. Different baseballs. The balls slugged by McGwire and Sosa and Bonds were not the same balls hit by Roger Maris and Hank Aaron. Because of liberation theology.

(Oh, and Barry Bonds belongs in the Hall of Fame. The man barely ever saw a fastball in the strike zone for the better part of a decade, which would make anybody grumpy. Then when the reporters who never liked him started celebrating the enhanced versions of McGwire and Sosa, I think Bonds decided to try the stuff they were using to see what he could do, and it turned out that what he could do on that stuff was terrifying.)

• Erik visits the American grave of someone truly deserving of all the invective he can muster: “This is the grave of Anthony Comstock, arguably the single worst American to ever live.”

That’s a dishonorarium for which there’s a lot of stiff competition. If we’re going to make a shortlist of potential “worst Americans to ever live,” the hardest part becomes keeping it short. One is forced to start making judgment calls about the relative odiousness of those who have been acutely and spectacularly evil — your Tim McVeighs and Jeffrey Dahmers and William Calleys, versus those whose harm and evil was far more influential and did massive lasting harm — your John C. Calhouns and Roger Taneys and Andrew Jacksons. Some candidates suggest themselves as a kind of archetypal embodiment of particular forms of awfulness — George Wallace, Andrew Carnegie, Leona Helmsley, Rush Limbaugh, Frank Rizzo.

Comstock is an interesting candidate in that he combines aspects of the second and third categories here. His particular brand of immoral moralizing and weaponized prudery lives on and still defines much of the makeup of our legislative and judicial branches of government. It might seem strange that, today, the most notable heirs of Anthony Comstock are a perpetually lying, sleazy failed casino mogul and a perjurious partisan hack accused of sexual assault by multiple women.

But then the more you think about Comstock and the people who followed him, the less strange that seems.

• Asked about potential replacements for Nikki Haley after her sudden resignation as the Trump administration’s UN ambassador, Donald Trump suggested that his own daughter, Ivanka, “would be dynamite.” He then said he wouldn’t nominate her because, “I’d then be accused of nepotism if you can believe it.”

And, well, yes — yes he would be “accused” of nepotism because he would be practicing nepotism. This would not be an “accusation,” but merely an observation. Hiring your own family members is exactly what “nepotism” means.

Trump loves to play this trick. He loves to characterize objective observations as criticisms or attacks, or to reframe the uncontroversial use of words according to their meaning as “accusations.”

He didn’t invent this trick, though. It’s something that arose from Very Bad Journalism of the sort that refuses to identify objectively negative actions as negative lest that objective naming of the thing be criticized as a criticism or as evidence of bias. Thus no matter how flagrantly corrupt a politician’s behavior might be, that corruption will only ever be named or identified at a distance, one or more steps removed, often through the passive voice. They will say a politician “has been accused of corruption” after accepting kickbacks and quid-pro-quo bribes on videotape. Or they’ll restate any disinterested negative points as the mere assertions of interested, biased “critics”: “Critics say the kill the puppies bill will result in puppies being killed.”

These “critics” never need to be named or directly cited — their function is to ensure that the reporter is not responsible for objectively identifying objective reality, because the reporter fears doing so will get them attacked for not being objective.

• Steve Earle, man.

Previous Post

October 9, 2018

'God's point of view'

Next Post

October 11, 2018 'They will inevitably learn and teach the wrong things'

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What valley did David face Goliath in?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Valley of Jezreel Valley of Achor Valley of Elah Kidron Valley