Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
Multi-level peer-to-peer marketing strategy

Multi-level peer-to-peer marketing strategy

Last updated on: September 12, 2018 at 8:44 pm by Fred Clark

Multi-level peer-to-peer marketing strategy 2018-09-12T20:44:16-04:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

So by the time you really realize what’s going on it seems like it’s too late to find any face-saving exit strategy. Not to mention the money, which you couldn’t afford, which was why you got into this mess in the first place.

The trunk of your car is filled with several cases of, like, herbal supplements or essential oils or off-label personal hygiene products. You own this stuff now, until you manage to sell it, and nobody seems to want to buy it. The whole load was only supposed to cost something like 800 bucks, but then there were all these brochures and display cases and one-time start-up fees and all-told you wound up spending something more like $1,400.

Not “spending,” they said. “Investing,” they said. Because while all of that stuff was “only” going to cost you a measly $800 investment, you’d be able to turn around and sell it for three times that. Your $800 was going to turn into $2,400, with a sweet $1,600 profit going right into your pocket.

Except it didn’t work out that way. Three months later you’ve sold about $65 worth of stuff and you stand to lose almost as much as you had once hoped to gain.

This is troubling and embarrassing. You were sure you’d done your homework and checked this out to make sure you weren’t getting swindled here. It all seemed legit. Bob and Sheila, who got you into this business, were very nice people and they seemed to be doing really well for themselves. You’d been to their house — a very nice, high-end house with a couple of very nice, high-end cars parked out front — and heard their first-hand testimony about how liberating it had been for them to work for themselves, eventually earning more than enough to quit their day jobs and do only this, full-time. They had assured you that you, too, could have that same level of success if you were just willing to put in the work.

They had also assured you not to worry because this was not a pyramid scheme. You had asked about that, after all, because you’re not stupid. And they had been very convincing when they explained how this was a legitimate multi-level, peer-to-peer marketing strategy, which was nothing at all like a pyramid scheme, really. Judges and juries had confirmed that definitively in several court cases — frivolous lawsuits brought by disgruntled people who hadn’t been willing to put in the work.

You weren’t like those people. You were willing to put in the work. And you did. You put in a lot of work.

But now it’s three months later and you’re kicking yourself as you begin to realize that it was never about putting in the work. You’re starting to realized that Bob and Sheila didn’t manage to quit their day jobs and pay off that big house by selling all the crap depreciating in your trunk. They made all that money by convincing suckers like you to join the scheme.

Or, rather, by convincing suckers like you to join the legitimate multi-level, peer-to-peer marketing strategy.

Wikimedia photo by Ricardo Liberato

And now you’re stuck. You’re either going to have to cut your losses and somehow come up with another side-hustle to make back your disastrous “investment” (plus the original expenses that investment was supposed to cover), or else you’re going to have to do what Bob and Sheila did and double-down, recruiting another level of saps by convincing them that they’ll be able to quit their day jobs and make all their dreams come true by selling this stuff and just putting in the work.

Doubling-down holds at least a slim chance of maybe making back the “investment” you seem otherwise sure to lose. Plus it would allow you to avoid the shame of admitting you’d gotten duped into making a poor choice in the first place.

That shame is interesting. It is, I think, misplaced. Because, yes, you got swindled, but you got honestly swindled. You didn’t fall for some get-rich-quick scheme. You fell for a earn-more-by-working-harder scheme, and there’s no shame in that.

You haven’t yet done anything shameful. If there’s any shame to be assigned here, it rightly belongs to Bob and Sheila. Sure, they tricked you, but there was nothing clever about that trick. Dishonesty and misrepresentation are not the hallmarks of cleverness. You trusted them and they proved untrustworthy. The shame of that is on them, not on you. You weren’t outsmarted. You were simply lied to.

But you’re still out several hundred dollars. And you now need several hundred dollars, which you’ll never get back from Bob and Sheila.

But you might get for yourself by imitating Bob and Sheila and turning around to take that money from another “level” of new recruits.

To do that, all you have to do is keep doing what you started. You have to tell others you believe in this product you’re selling, and that you believe in this business model as a good way to supplement your income.

And that was all perfectly true when you first said it three months ago, because three months ago you really did believe all of that yourself. And it was all perfectly true the whole time you yourself were putting in all that work.

So what would be the harm, really, in telling others something that you yourself once wholeheartedly and sincerely believed?

The difference, of course, is that three months ago you said all of that in good faith, but if you were to repeat it now you could no longer do so. Now you’d be saying it in bad faith. Three months ago, you yourself were honestly deceived, but now you would be dishonestly deceiving others.

But maybe there’s some wiggle room on that. I mean, it wouldn’t be dishonest to keep saying what you’ve been saying for these past three months if you really, earnestly want to keep believing it’s true, right?

Bob and Sheila will back you up on that. They’ll encourage to go on believing and to go on saying you truly believe. And once you convince those new recruits to join you, their utter genuineness of their new belief will fortify your own with a fresh infusion of honesty and sincerity, right? As long as you can keep adding new believers, the cumulative total of honest, good-faith belief should remain sufficient and thereby allow you and Bob and Sheila to comfortably reassure yourselves that there’s no shame in any of this, as long as you’re willing to put in the work.

Anyway, something like that, I imagine, accounts for the 32 percent of Americans who told Quinnipiac pollsters that they “believe” Donald J. Trump is “honest.”

Previous Post

September 10, 2018

Come too far to turn back now

Next Post

September 13, 2018 Smart people saying smart things (9.13.18)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was Mary's cousin?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Sarah Leah Rachel Elizabeth