Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
A Modest Proposal Regarding Prayer Breakfasts

A Modest Proposal Regarding Prayer Breakfasts

Last updated on: May 1, 2018 at 7:40 am by Fred Clark

A Modest Proposal Regarding Prayer Breakfasts 2018-05-01T07:40:13-04:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

And whenever you pray, do not be like the hypocrites; for they love to stand and pray in the churches and at the street corners, so that they may be seen by others.

“Gov. Eric Greitens … is scheduled to be the keynote speaker at a St. Louis Area Police Chiefs Association prayer breakfast on Wednesday,” the St. Louis Post-Dispatch reported yesterday. Let’s break this down and attempt to enumerate some of the many Bad Things involved in that short sentence.

1. Missouri Gov. Eric Greitens is currently facing two felony charges and other allegations of serious ethical violations. One felony charge involves his alleged attempt to blackmail the woman with whom he was having an affair (the woman has also accused Greitens of coerced, non-consensual sex — i.e., rape and assault). The second charge, “computer tampering,” involves the alleged misuse of a charitable database for political fundraising.

It’s astonishing that Greitens is still in office. The financial allegations are deeply sleazy and the sexual/blackmail allegations are stomach-turning. How is this man still getting invited to offer spiritual insight at a prayer breakfast?

2. I’m not a lawyer, but as I understand it, “in the criminal justice system, the people are represented by two separate yet equally important groups: The police, who investigate crime, and the district attorneys, who prosecute the offenders.” (Dun dun.) The efforts of those district attorneys seem to be undermined if the police chiefs, in concert, heap pious honors on accused offenders by inviting them to be the keynote speakers at official police prayer breakfasts. This would seem to constitute an unwelcome meddling in the prosecution of Mr. Greitens.

3. Eric Greitens seems to be a Very Bad person and a Very Bad governor, but apart from that, governors in general should not be invited to speak at prayer breakfasts. Government officials and politicians, as a rule, should not be invited to speak at prayer breakfasts.

Yet such invitations are routinely extended and accepted. So much so that they’ve become a kind of political ritual. The bigger the politician, the bigger a deal the prayer breakfast is seen to be. This is also Very Bad.

Governors get invited to speak at prayer breakfasts because religion is seeking validation from the state and from partisan political identification. Governors accept such invitations because they are seeking validation from religion. Both sides of that bargain are corrupt and corrupting.

Inviting the governor to speak at your prayer breakfast is like inviting Herod to join the disciples in the Upper Room. Or like inviting Pilate to Gethsemane.

Oh, wait, someone actually did invite Pilate to Gethsemane. Remember who did that? Yeah, it was Judas. Maybe try not to emulate Judas?

4. Police Chiefs Associations shouldn’t be having prayer breakfasts. All of the problems with point No. 3 above are compounded and multiplied by the idea of a Police Chiefs Association prayer breakfast, an event at which not just the guest speakers, but everyone in attendance is a government official. A Police Chiefs Association prayer breakfast is a transparent, cynical attempt to wrap the police in a mantle of sanctimonious piety. It’s an exploitation of religion, not an expression of it. That’s Very Bad.

5. This is the St. Louis Area Police Chiefs Association. You know, the bozos who brought us this:

That’s from the hyper-militarized cos-playing reaction of St. Louis Area police chiefs to unarmed citizens peacefully exercising their right to protest the extrajudicial killing of an unarmed man by Ferguson police. Those same St. Louis Area police chiefs also approved the use of tear gas on the population they are paid to “serve and protect,” gassing women, children and clergy.

The St. Louis Area Police Chiefs need to get Jesus’ name out of their mouths. I don’t want to hear a word about prayer from this bunch unless it’s prayers of confession and repentance. They need a fast, not a breakfast. Sackcloth and ashes, not pancakes and sausage.

6. Prayer breakfasts tend to be either pervasively sectarian or else so flaccidly vague and generic as to be meaningless expressions of nothing more than the politicized civil religion of the status quo. Either of those is Very Bad. In this case, I suspect the prayer breakfast in question manages the tricky feat of being both. This is Even Worse.

7. Officially, this event is the “Police Officer Memorial Prayer Breakfast.” That seems more defensible, in general. Mourning the dead is always good and proper, after all, and prayer certainly seems like a traditional and appropriate aspect of that. Honoring the memory of police officers, particularly of those who died in the line of duty, is surely above reproach.

But it’s because such memorializing of the dead is beyond reproach that this whole affair seems even sleazier. See again point No. 3 above and consider what it is that the memory of the dead is here being used to validate, how this whole political/sectarian/status-quo-worshipping ritual is exploiting their memory in service of political/sectarian/status-quo-worshipping ends.

8. There shouldn’t be “prayer breakfasts.” At all.

I will refrain here from making an extended Baptist/Anabaptist argument against these ceremonies of public piety and civil religion and just point out the basic risk/reward arithmetic involved in the decision to organize any given prayer breakfast. Make a pro-/con- list if you like. On the con- side, consider all of the above and all of the potential damage done to religion and politics, to church and to state, posed by any given prayer breakfast. Include also the actual damage done to religion and to politics, to church and to state, by numerous actual prayer breakfasts that have actually occurred.

Now, on the pro- side, list all of the Good Things that have resulted from prayer breakfasts in the past.

Can you think of any? Can you point to any such positive results? I cannot. Or, at least, I cannot think of any that could not better have been produced through other, less dangerous, less corrupting means. The very best prayer breakfast seems to contribute less good to society than the very worst monthly Rotary luncheon.

If “abolish prayer breakfasts” seems like an extreme or dangerous notion to you, then take a moment to reflect on how vanishingly little any of us would stand to lose from such a proposition. Get rid of prayer breakfasts. No one will miss them when they’re gone, and religion and politics would both be better off for their absence.

Previous Post

April 24, 2018

'A kind of resentful nostalgia'

Next Post

April 26, 2018 'If no one asks, then no one answers'

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who denied Jesus three times before the rooster crowed?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Judas Peter Thomas John