A ‘Quadrilateral’ for Those Not Living in 18th-Century Britain

Last updated on: January 4, 2018 at 2:45 pm by Fred Clark

A ‘Quadrilateral’ for Those Not Living in 18th-Century Britain 2018-01-04T14:45:09-05:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

It’s 2018 and respectable publications are running scads of think pieces on the meaning of “evangelical” that read like the archives of this blog from 2004. It’s nice to see folks catching up.

This piece from the Christian Science Monitor’s Harry Bruinius is typical of this now-thriving genre, “In Trump era, what does it mean to be an evangelical?” Bruinius does a good job identifying some of the more perceptive scholars of American evangelicalism — George Marsden, Tim Gloege, Randall Balmer — and letting them speak in his piece.

Bruinius misspells “Bebbington,” which is kind of wonderful since it spotlights the weirdness of allowing a four-part description intended for Evangelicalism in Modern Britain: 1730-1980 to become the procrustean framework for understanding white American Protestantism in the 21st century.

The past (left) versus the present (right).

That’s why I think Kristin Kobes Du Mez — a history professor at Calvin College — offers the most clear-eyed answer to the question posed in the piece’s title. She isn’t trying to force her description to fit into the typology Bebbington created to describe 18th-century Bible Christians in England. Nor does she get trapped in the standard — and in some ways misleading — narrative of Scopes-Henry-Falwell sketched out earlier by Bruinius. Dr. Du Mez simply reminds us what it is that we’re looking at today in America when we look at this thing called “evangelicalism”:

“It’s hard to talk about modern, 20th-century American evangelicalism without putting race at the center,” said Kristin Kobes Du Mez, a professor of history at Calvin College in Grand Rapids, Michigan. “It’s not just a pure doctrinal matter.”

If people identify as being born again or as an evangelical, this means something to them, she said. And in addition to faithful church attendance, there’s also what she calls a “culture of consumption,” of popular evangelical media, books, movies, and music, often promoted by television personalities.

“I look at the last half century of American evangelicalism, I find as a defining feature the desire to claim cultural power,” Du Mez said. “And along with that comes a Christian nationalism.”

We can tease that into a “quadrilateral” that seems far more apt, valuable, and insightful for anyone attempting to say what it means to be an “evangelical” in America in the Trump era (or, for that matter, in the George W. Bush era).

1. Race is at the center.

2. Doctrine is secondary.

3. Membership in a market-driven consumer subculture.

4. Driven by a desire to claim cultural power.

This better-fitting quadrilateral helps to explain the True Scotsmen shenanigans and shifting weights and measures currently getting tossed around in an effort to defend some imagined Platonic ideal of evangelicalism from the observed reality of its lockstep association with Trumpism and W’s M.D.

The “desire to claim cultural power” requires evangelicalism to be defined as broadly as possible to make the numbers seem massive, powerful, and deserving of hegemonic control. So everybody who can be claimed as vaguely Bebbington-ish gets included — from Trump-worshipping court evangelicals like Jeffers and Falwell and Paula White, to all the black and Latino “evangelicals” otherwise excluded from the consumer subculture and from ever having a “seat at the table.” But when that close association with Trumpism diminishes all pretense of evangelical moral authority — thereby threatening its bid for cultural power — the lines have to be redrawn to exclude the previously included court evangelicals and Charismanews whackaloons. And all of those non-white “evangelicals” who get included when the push for cultural power requires bigger numbers also get excluded every other November because they fail to vote as they’re told by evangelical gatekeepers.

Bruinius gives the final word to another history professor, Bill Svelmoe of St. Mary’s College (Indiana), who describes himself as a former Republican and (therefore, by necessity) a former evangelical:

“What happens is, as you plant your flag over the Republican Party as the party not just with the right ideas about abortion, or even ideas about the economy, it becomes the moral party, God’s party,” Svelmoe said. “And now you have to defend everything with a religious fervor. And the folks on the other side are now your enemies, they are on the devil’s side.”

Svelmoe names the defining feature of American evangelicalism that might, at first, seem to be missing from the quadrilateral I’ve borrowed from Du Mez: abortion politics. But look again. Abortion politics is present in every one of those four distinctives — present as both expression and excuse.

Previous Post

January 2, 2018

White Evangelical Hostility to Science is Still a Thing

Next Post

January 4, 2018 They can't even sing to their shadows

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What Christian group is known for wearing black hats and beards?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Orthodox Jews Mennonites Amish Quakers