Presume good faith, but check it out

Last updated on: November 1, 2017 at 8:08 pm by Fred Clark

Presume good faith, but check it out 2017-11-01T20:08:47-04:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

A basic rule of civil discourse is the presumption of charity. What that means is that we ought to start off by giving others the benefit of the doubt — the assumption that they are speaking truthfully, in good faith, that they mean what they say.

This idea is a Good Thing. It’s not merely polite, but a moral obligation. This is Golden Rule stuff — treating others as we would want them to treat us. It’s also practical and useful, facilitating clearer communication that helps us to quickly resolve — or at least precisely identify — disagreements. This is where we should begin when we engage in conversation with others.

But it’s not where we always should end. The presumption of charity is exactly that — a pre-sumption. It’s a starting point and a working theory that we should stick with for as long as that theory remains viable. But not after that. The presumption of charity in conversation is just like the presumption of innocence in a criminal trial. Every defendant is presumed innocent unless and until they are proven guilty. When the evidence and the testimony allows for no reasonable doubt that the defendant is, in fact, guilty, then the presumption of innocence no longer holds force. It’s a starting point, but not a mandatory, foreordained conclusion.

The presumption of charity is the subject of a great deal of handwringing among the sort of people who talk a lot about “civility” and “civil discourse” and such. They fret that such high-minded notions are all too rare these days, and that our discourse is suffering as a result.

They’re wrong about that. The problem is not that we have abandoned this presumption of good faith, but that we have become reluctant to abandon it even in the face of clear evidence that it is untenable. Those who make a living by arguing in bad faith know this, and they’ve gotten very skilled at exploiting it. The presumption of good faith has thus been weaponized and turned against itself.

BelieveTrump

This is what’s missing from this Atlantic article — “How American Politics Became So Exhausting” — in which Emma Green interviews Alan Jacobs. Jacobs is perceptive on many points here, and to his credit he takes pains to acknowledge that “a plea for civility can be a way of consolidating power,” and that the victims of injustice have every right not to allow notions of civility to keep them from seeking redress. But in this bit, he’s missing the forest for the trees:

Conspiracy theories tend to arise when you can’t think of any rational explanation for people believing or acting in a certain way. The more absurd you think your political or moral or spiritual opponents’ views are, the more likely you are to look for some explanation other than the simplest one, which is that they believe it’s true.

One category that’s gone away in America is “wrong.” Nobody is just “wrong.” They’re wicked, they’re evil, they’re malicious, they’re the victims of these vast subterranean forces.

Just consider those first five words: “Conspiracy theories tend to arise.” No. No they do not. Conspiracy theories are not the weather. These are human artifacts — human creations. They do not arise via spontaneous generation. People make them up. People write them.

Normally I get upset when someone refuses to give credit to writers. Here it’s less a case of these writers being denied credit than of them being shielded from blame.

The kinds of “conspiracy theories” Jacobs is talking about are a kind of folklore. They are the work of folks, and cannot “arise” without them. Like most folklore, their composition tends to be both anonymous and collaborative. These stories get invented, embellished, refined, crafted and re-crafted over time. And every step of that process is intentional. That intent may sometimes be less than wholly conscious, but it can never be wholly unconscious either. People are making choices at every step. Others beyond this collaborative process of creation are also making choices — the choice to receive the folklore, the choice to presume its innocence without examination, the choice to pass it along.

It’s difficult to pin down for sure what Jacobs means here by “conspiracy theory.” On the one hand, he seems to be referring to convoluted ideas that involve “some explanation other than the simplest one.” But in the next breath, he describes such thinking as accusatory — as imputing wickedness and malice. The problem here is that such an accusation of malice is sometimes the simplest explanation.

Again, the key distinction here is between our starting point and the conclusions we may reach later based on the evidence before us. Jacobs seems most concerned with certain kinds of conclusions — with concluding that others are “wicked … evil … malicious.” But such conclusions are not the problem when that is what the evidence suggests. Following the evidence to reach such conclusions does not make us more prone to inventing, accepting, or spreading “conspiracy theories.” On the contrary, conspiracy theories tend to arise — i.e., to be deliberately invented, and crafted, and spread — when this attribution of wickedness and evil is our starting point, but we can find no evidence to support it.

Whether we call these “conspiracy theories” or simply false witness borne against our neighbors, such folklore is the embodiment of bad faith, dishonesty, and deliberate malice. And one reason such false witness is so easy to spread these days is because we’ve persuaded ourselves that it would be uncivil — and therefore forbidden — to recognize it as such.

Previous Post

October 31, 2017

There's a crack in the mirror and a bloodstain on the bed

Next Post

November 2, 2017 Jell-O salads and Catholic hospitals

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was the high priest when Jesus was crucified?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Gamaliel Nicodemus Caiaphas Annas