Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

slacktivist

‘Between Zero and One’

Last updated on: October 30, 2017 at 8:01 am   by Fred Clark

‘Between Zero and One’ 2017-10-30T08:01:37-04:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

As relief agencies struggle to deal — simultaneously — with two of the largest refugee crises since the second World War, the Trump Administration has slashed the number of people the United States is willing to grant refuge.

The United States, one of the wealthiest nations in the world and formerly a leader on the world stage, admitted only 53,716 refugees in the fiscal year ending last month. Church groups, the UN, and relief workers all say that number is far too low, but the Trump administration apparently wants to make it even lower.

White House chief of staff and Hand of the Trump John Kelly — the former general disgraced last week by his choice to make up nasty lies about a grieving Gold Star family and a member of Congress — apparently thinks that accepting any refugees is accepting too many.

“Kelly said he’d prefer to admit between zero and one refugees into the US each year,” The Hill reports:

White House chief of staff John Kelly reportedly told other members of the Trump administration that if it were up to him the number of refugees admitted into the U.S. would be between zero and one.

The New York Times reported Wednesday that Kelly made the comment while the administration debated lowering the cap on the number of refugees allowed into the country.

President Trump eventually decided to lower the refugee cap to 45,000, the lowest levels since the Reagan administration, when the Refugee Act was passed.

Admitting zero refugees would, of course, be blandly evil. That’s what a villain would do.

But John Kelly’s idea of admitting just one, single refugee — that’s what the villain would do. That is not just evil, but literary evil. Rejecting all refugees simply makes one a part of the immoral crowd, a participant in amorphous, faceless cruelty. But rejecting every refugee except one — that makes you the antagonist.

JohnKelly

“Save one, let all the others die” is an ancient, time-honored tactic for antagonists who seek to impose a blanket oppression, but who also want to savor their cruelty. This was the approach attempted by Haman in the story of Esther. It was the same villainy demonstrated in the story of Lot in Sodom and its parallel in Judges 19.

“One of you will be spared, but all the rest will be killed” is the hallmark of the most sadistic villains. “You’re all going to die” is never quite as twisted or creepy as that. This is why those horrifying Saw movies were such big hits. Your wife or your child? Which of your children?

Kelly’s Single Refugee idea is almost like a more extreme, deadlier version of the Joker’s bombs-on-two-ferries scheme in The Dark Knight — as though Kelly wanted to replicate that, but with millions of bombs on millions of single-person canoes.

The idea is like the start of a hackneyed epic fantasy series: “Spare the orphan boy, but let his kindly old mentor and the rest of his village die,” the Dark Lord cackles, six books before that boy grows up to be the Chosen One who overthrows his evil empire.

“Between zero and one.” Good people don’t think like that. John Kelly does. So does his boss.

The best that can be said for Kelly is that he’s speaking out of fear. Admitting refugees, he seems to think, creates risk. But the risk that John Kelly is worried about is not a risk to public safety — he knows that’s nonsense. He knows that refugees are families fleeing war and disaster, and that they pose no risk to America. But what he’s worried about is political risk. He fears that some day, some person somehow connected to a refugee might do something, and that he will be Willie-Hortoned because of it. It’s the same fear that leads other cowardly politicians to seek to eliminate parole in just the same way he wants to eliminate refuge.

This would-be antagonist is a sad, frightened, weak little man.

Uncategorized

immigration

Trump

Previous Post



October 25, 2017

And let perpetual light shine upon him

Next Post



October 27, 2017 LBCF, No. 157: 'The Pope of Mount Prospect'


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which empire destroyed the First Temple in Jerusalem?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Roman Empire Babylonian Empire Persian Empire Assyrian Empire

Related posts from slacktivist

Family

'One of the good ones' obscures a dangerous...

slacktivist

Family

The end of 20th-century white evangelicalism

slacktivist

Family

ICE vs. churches (cont'd.)

slacktivist

Family

Feliz Navidad

slacktivist

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian

The First Eucharistic Controversy: Christ’s Real Presence

For Catholics, the Eucharist is the source and summit of the Christian...

What a Stop Sign Can Teach Us About...

How to Make a Decision When You Can't Hear God Main point:...

Archdiocese Hosts Military Marriage Retreat in Germany

RASTATT, Germany — The transient military lifestyle, with its frequent deployments and...

Minted in God's Image

Nearly every morning, I make the drive to Detroit with my high-school-age...

The Real AI Story Is Adoption Without Trust

Artificial intelligence has crossed a political threshold. It is no longer a...

Walking through History

  A new article, written by Jeff Lindsay and Gale L. Pooley,...

view all Progressive Christian blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube