Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
The Face of White Christian Nationalism

The Face of White Christian Nationalism

Last updated on: October 2, 2017 at 9:53 am by Fred Clark

The Face of White Christian Nationalism 2017-10-02T09:53:56-04:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Roy Moore — a man twice elected to and twice removed from the Alabama Supreme Court — won the Republican nomination for the United States Senate yesterday in Dixie.

It’s been a rough year for the Republican Party in Alabama. Gov. Robert Bentley resigned after getting caught using state funds to cover up an extramarital affair he was having with a woman he also hired to violate the Constitution by suppressing the votes of non-white citizens. He was the third prominent Republican to leave office in disgrace recently, following the removal of the state legislature’s Speaker of the House, Mike Hubbard, who was sentenced to four years in prison for felony ethics violations, and Moore, who was suspended — again, this time for life — for thinking that he didn’t have to abide by the ruling of a higher court.

None of that means much in Alabama, though, because — thanks in part to those effective voter-suppression tactics from Bentley and his mistress — it has increasingly become a deep-red, one-party state. That means yesterday’s Republican primary likely settled the state’s general election, and that Roy Moore will become the next U.S. senator from the great state of Alabama.

That’s unfortunate, because Moore is bonkers. And, also too, he’s just not very bright.

Moore is sometimes described as a representative or a spokesman for the brand of right-wing religious politics that forms his base of support. That seems unfair, though, because I’m not sure that Moore himself really understands that ideology. He doesn’t appear to understand much of anything. His critics are correct when they say he advocates a kind of theocracy, but those critics have a better idea of what that means than Moore does himself. He doesn’t so much argue for theocracy as flail about in that direction. If you described it to him, he’d like it, but he’d be unable to articulate the thing himself.

Face

“There’s Sharia law, as I understand it, in Illinois, Indiana — up there. I don’t know,” he said in a recent interview with Vox. “I was informed that there were. But if they’re not, it doesn’t matter.”

Asked about DACA and the status of Dreamers, Moore said he’d never heard of it or the years of controversy surrounding the law. “Why don’t you tell me what it is, Dale, and quit beating around and tell me what it is.” He does say, however, that “I’d put the military down there,” to guard America’s southern border. So he’s an anti-immigration demagogue who has never bothered to learn anything about immigration — or even anything about being an anti-immigration demagogue. (To paraphrase Rick Blaine, “I don’t mind a xenophobic racist, I object to a cut-rate one.”)

Moore is also a birther. He opposes “transistor troops in our bathrooms.” His opposition to legal abortion involves “sovereign-citizen” style nonsense (“the doctrine of the lesser magistrate“) and calls for women who have abortions to be prosecuted for murder. He’s chummy with the Neo-Nazis and Neo-Confederates of the League of the South. And he worships Nehushtan. (That’s not disqualifying in itself, mind you — no religious tests for office — but the fact that Moore is, himself, unaware of his own religion seems like a big problem.)

In another time and place, yesterday’s primary results would have been more very bad news for the Alabama Republican Party. Moore’s victory puts a dim loon on the ballot as the party’s standard-bearer, and that has often meant a well-deserved defeat in the general election. Think of Sharon Angle in Nevada. Or of Christine O’Donnell in Delaware.

Chris Coons has turned out to be a smart and very capable U.S. senator. That’s not surprising, since he started out as a smart and very capable county executive in the First State. But he didn’t enter the senate race expecting to win. Republican Rep. Mike Castle was expected to be the Republican nominee, and Castle — the second-most popular person in Delaware — seemed like a sure bet to win Joe Biden’s former seat. Once Beau Biden opted not to run for his father’s seat, Castle seemed unbeatable, so Democratic leaders asked Coons to offer himself up as a sacrificial lamb who could lose the race with dignity. (This was a Democratic tradition in Delaware for races against Mike Castle. His previous big wins for re-election to the state’s lone House seat were against his former law partner, who amiably refused to say anything bad about his old friend during the campaign.)

But when confident Republicans failed to show up to vote on primary day, O’Donnell shocked everybody by sneaking off with the party’s nomination by a few thousand votes. O’Donnell was not a witch, but she was bonkers, confidently misinformed, and prone to saying ludicrous and indefensibly bizarre things. Just like Roy Moore.

The difference, though, is that Moore was not an underdog outsider who snuck off with the nomination in a low-turnout primary. He was the frontrunner throughout that race. And he’s got an enthusiastic base of support — the same white Christian nationalists who twice elected him to the post of chief justice regard his twice-removal from that office as evidence of their “persecution,” a grievance and resentment they cherish and nurture more than their own children.

Plus, keep in mind, Christine O’Donnell still got 40 percent of the general election vote back in 2010. That two-fifths of the electorate has only grown and been emboldened since then. In 2010, it likely represented a chunk of voters who would vote for the Republican nominee even if, or despite, their being an unqualified, authoritarian loon. Today, that 40 percent represents a chunk of voters who are voting for O’Donnell- and Moore-like nominees because of those reasons.

If their elections were held today, I think O’Donnell or Sharon Angle could win.

And maybe that’s not the worst thing. As Scott Lemieux said yesterday, the punchline of Roy Moore’s nomination is “I can’t say he’d be a worse senator than, say, Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III.” If Roy Moore may not be capable or qualified, but he’s still an accurate pick to be the Republican standard-bearer in Alabama.

Over at Balloon Juice, DougJ sums it up pretty well:

I went through a stage of feeling bad that I usually rooted for the craziest Republican to win in every primary but after the very reasonable Graham and Cassidy plotted to kill thousands of Americans, I decided f–k it, we’re better off with the openly crazy than with the very serious … types.

I hope that Democrats nationwide support Doug Jones as Moore’s opponent in the general election. Moore looks like a lock to be Alabama’s next senator — with enthusiastic support from the same people who kept re-electing Jeff Sessions all those years. But keeping Moore out of the Senate is important for all the same reasons that law-abiding Alabamans decided they had to keep Moore off of the state’s highest court, so if there’s even the slightest chance for a miraculous upset, it’s worth pursuing.

But I also think DougJ is right. A slightly smarter and more presentable, slightly more supposedly “mainstream” Republican like Luther Strange wouldn’t vote any differently than Roy Moore will. Guys like Strange still stick to dog-whistles and the illusion of conservative principles (even while, for example, stealing a seat on the Supreme Court, defending Trump in hearings, threatening debt default, and spending all their energy on health care bills they know must never be allowed to become law).

In contrast to them, Roy Moore is the unvarnished reality. He is the unmasked, unmaskable face of the white Christian nationalism that the Republican Party represents in the age of Trump. As Edmund says in one of the Narnia books, “If there is a wasp in the room I like to be able to see it.”

Moore must be stopped. He likely won’t be. But at least we’ll be able to see what’s stinging us.

Previous Post

September 26, 2017

Jubilee for Puerto Rico

Next Post

September 27, 2017 The faculty lounge meets to discuss the faculty lounge

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "Sabbath" mean?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Holy Feast Sacrifice Rest