Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
Student’s paper shows promise

Student’s paper shows promise

Last updated on: August 27, 2017 at 3:26 pm by Fred Clark

Student’s paper shows promise 2017-08-27T15:26:30-04:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The new semester starts this week. Let’s imagine you’re a TA for some freshman class in American history or sociology, something like that. Maybe poli sci, or government, or even American lit or American theology. Or maybe one of those first-year multidisciplinary orientation classes titled something like Human Diversity and American Culture.

Anyway, the professor likes to assign short essays on Day 1, just to gauge where her students are coming from. One of these assignments asks the new class to write a one-paragraph summary of race in America. This is, quite deliberately, a daunting assignment, with brevity forcing clarity (or exposing the lack thereof). But these micro-essays won’t affect students’ grades for the semester — the exercise isn’t to determine what students know, but what they will need to learn.

And but so, as the teaching assistant for the class, you’ve now got a pile of these papers in front of you and one of them reads something like this:

No individual, people, or nation is perfect. Among the most grievous sins committed by early Americans was the enslavement of and trafficking in Africans and African Americans. Slavery was formally abolished in 1865, but racism was not. Indeed, it was often institutionalized and in some ways heightened over time through Jim Crow legislation, de facto segregation, structural inequalities, and pervasively racist attitudes. And other persons of color, including Native Americans, Asian Americans, and Hispanic Americans, have often been subjected to official and unofficial discrimination. What we have seen in Charlottesville makes it clear once again that racism is not a thing of the past, something that brothers and sisters of color have been trying to tell [white Americans] for years.

That’s not bad. This student writes well. And, commendably, they demonstrate some understanding that racism involves more than just the past injustices of slavery and Jim Crow. The student is, perhaps, a bit overeager to come across as “woke,” but otherwise stands out as quite well-prepared to begin this class.

Now fast-forward to the end of the semester.

Now it’s the last week of classes, leading up to the final. This is when the professor reveals to her students that they will be asked to revisit the same series of micro-essays that they were asked to write back on the first day of class. The exercise is still, in part, for the professor’s benefit, again serving as a gauge for where students are at, but this time as an evaluation of how successful she and her class have been in communicating what the students need to know. Also, unlike that first round of essays, these will be graded.

In the stack of end-of-the-semester papers, you find a paragraph much like the one quoted above. (Not identical, mind you — the point of this little hypothetical is about the substance of this paragraph, not about detecting plagiarism.) At this point such a paragraph would seem a bit more disappointing. Where it might have shown great promise for an incoming student at the beginning of the semester, now — after all of the reading and lectures and discussions of the entire course — it fails to demonstrate the depth of understanding that one might expect or hope for after months of study.

Granted, the extreme focus required by the assignment is still deucedly tough. One paragraph seems cruelly inadequate for the subject at hand and, as a fair-minded TA, you’ll want to allow some leeway here for degree of difficulty. But this still doesn’t read like an A paper.

That initial apologetic need to convey that no nation is perfect — that racism did not end in 1865 and is not a thing of the past — might have seemed innocently naive at the start of the semester, but now it loses some of that innocence.

VotingRights1963

More troubling is the way the student doesn’t seem to have integrated the subject into their larger understanding of America. They seem to regard racism as a blot on the surface of the nation and its laws, history, culture, religion, politics, etc., rather than as an elemental, ontological aspect of the nation’s identity. They seem to think of America as something over here, intact and of itself, while racism is something else over there, something external and vestigial that occasionally, unfortunately, rubs up against American life. They recognize the possibility of structural racism as a problem requiring vigilance, rather than as an intrinsic reality. It seems, for them, to be a problem that America has, rather than an aspect of what America is.

The essay isn’t wrong, exactly, just somewhat inadequate. As the TA, you have to wonder if this student completed or comprehended all the required reading for this class. The student has, perhaps, observed those ideas, but hasn’t digested them.

So grade-wise I’m thinking, what? — a solid B, maybe? B-minus?* And definitely some longish notes in the margins on what they’ll need to improve on if they want to do better than that on the final.

The punchline here, as you may have already realized, is that this is not a hypothetical paragraph and it was not written by a freshman student. It is, rather, from another of those generally commendable public statements and mass-signatory open letters produced in the wake of the most recent white supremacist violence in Charlottesville. Specifically, it’s from “An Open Letter From Christian Scholars on Racism in America Today.”

I have great respect and personal fondness for many of the good people who signed onto this. (It’s certainly not that I disrespect or dislike the others, it’s just that I don’t know many of these names.) The invitation to endorse it was somewhat binary and, given that, I think they were right to lend their weight to its side of the scale. I think the statement itself and its endorsement by these many scholars is, on balance, a Good Thing.

But I also suspect — or, at least, hope — that many of them would agree with me about the grade its description of the problem would merit if it were submitted as an essay in any of their classes. I suspect that many would agree that this statement fails to adequately grasp the breadth and depth and pervasive, enduring scope of the matter. Others perhaps would not agree.

The apparent (white) freshman-level understanding reflected in the paragraph I’ve quoted may be partly due to the unfortunate “dumbing-down” that scholars sometimes think they need to do to communicate to a broader, popular audience of non-specialists. It may be partly due, as we’ve already said, to the extreme difficulty of cramming all that needs to be expressed into a single paragraph on short notice.

But I think it’s also partly also an accurate measure of where this group of students is at here at the beginning of a new semester.

This shows these kids have great promise and admirable intentions. But it also shows that they have a lot to learn and to absorb in the months and years ahead.

– – – – – – – – – – –

* Again, though, the paragraph is clearly written with well-constructed sentences. If you’ve ever really been a TA slogging through an actual stack of student papers — many of which are, alas, not so clearly or coherently written — then you’re likely aware of the halo effect that provides, and how it means that this paper would likely get a higher grade than it might otherwise receive if it were read in isolation, just due to your sense of gratitude over not having to struggle to comprehend what it was attempting to say.

Previous Post

August 26, 2017

A 'recent painful episode'

Next Post

August 28, 2017 The promissory note first, then you can talk about the dream

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What city was Paul traveling to when he encountered Jesus in a vision?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Jerusalem Rome Antioch Damascus