Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
LBCF, No. 115: ‘Late-night phone calls’

LBCF, No. 115: ‘Late-night phone calls’

Last updated on: January 6, 2017 at 7:46 am by Fred Clark

LBCF, No. 115: ‘Late-night phone calls’ 2017-01-06T07:46:49-05:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Originally posted June 8, 2007.

Read this entire series, for free, via the convenient Left Behind Index. This post is also part of the ebook collection The Anti-Christ Handbook: Volume 1, available on Amazon for just $2.99. Volume 2 of The Anti-Christ Handbook, completing all the posts on the first Left Behind book, is also now available.

Left Behind, pp. 288-292

Rayford Steele is regretting his bizarre behavior on the phone with Hattie Durham.

If only he’d been more suave or more subtle in his seduction proselytizing, “She’d have been none the wiser and he could have eased into his real reason for inviting her to dinner.” And then two sentences later: “His real motive, even for talking with Hattie, was to communicate to Chloe.”

There’s something odd, and maybe a little creepy, about Rayford’s notion of evangelism. It seems to involve a lot of making sure that his “real” motives and reasons are kept hidden so that others are “none the wiser.” Kind of the Amway approach.

Rayford can’t sleep, so even though it’s after midnight he calls up the Rev. Bruce Barnes to vent. Here’s another inadvertent bit of realism: Even when 99 percent of the congregation has been raptured, the pastor is still going to have to deal with phone calls in the middle of the night from the remaining 1 percent.

“It’s really hard when it’s your own daughter.”

“I can imagine,” Bruce said.

“No, you can’t,” Rayford said.

Rayford hangs up, and since he’s no longer on the phone, we return to Buck & Nicky.

It’s well after 1 a.m. in Chaim Rosenzweig’s “beautiful suite of rooms” at the Plaza. “You do not mind my calling you Buck, do you?” Carpathia says. “They call you that because you buck the traditions and the trends and the conventions.”

This repeats, nearly verbatim, the explanation of Buck’s nickname from way back on page 6. He’s the Dirty Harry of journalism, the renegade maverick who plays by his own rules, etc. In the intervening 280+ pages we’ve seen little evidence to support this characterization. Ignoring his deadline for the cover story on a global cataclysm might technically count as “bucking” journalistic convention, I suppose, in the same way that his craven willingness to drop his story in order to save his own hide bucks the conventions of “crusading journalist” stories, but I doubt that’s what the authors had in mind.

Buck and Carpathia begin their late-night conversation in this hotel room and it reads like, well, like a late-night conversation in a hotel room:

“It is amazing, is it not, that all those different international meetings right here in New York over the next few weeks are all about the worldwide cooperation in which I am interested?”

“It is,” Buck said. “And I’ve been assigned to cover them.”

“Then we will be getting to know each other better.”

“I look forward to that, sir. I was most moved at the U.N. today.”

“Thank you.”

“And Dr. Rosenzweig has told me so much about you.”

“As he has told me much about you.”

There was a knock at the door. Carpathia looked pained. “I had hoped we would not be disturbed.”

Phew. Was it getting hot in there, or was it just me?

The interruption occurred because the president of the United States is on the phone, calling for Carpathia. The president apparently spent his day the same way everyone else did — watching CSPAN coverage of Nicolae’s U.N. speech and then watching the Nightline interview. And at 1:30 in the morning, he decided to call the Romanian president. Carpathia puts him on speaker:

“Mr. Carpathia, this is Fitz. Gerald Fitzhugh.”

“Mr. President, I am honored to hear from you.”

“Well, hey, it’s good to have you here!”

“I appreciated your note of congratulations on my presidency, sir, and your immediate recognition of my administration.”

“Boy, that was a heckuva thing, how you took over there. I wasn’t sure what had happened at first, but I don’t suppose you were either.”

“That is exactly right. I am still getting used to it.”

“Well, take it from a guy who’s been in the saddle for six years. You don’t ever get used to it. You just develop calluses in the right places, if you know what I mean.”

When introducing the president as a character in a work of fiction you have to decide whether or not to base the character on a real-life person. LaHaye & Jenkins opted not to — probably due to the fact that in order for him to still be in office their president would have to have missed the Rapture. Even so, it’s interesting that they did not base “President Fitzhugh” on the man who was in office in 1995, Bill Clinton. Even though Clinton is a church-going, Bible-quoting Southern Baptist married to a church-going, Bible-quoting United Methodist, I’m pretty sure L&J wouldn’t consider either of them to be genuine, Rapture-eligible Real True Chrisitians.

“Fitz” isn’t based on Clinton, or on any of his immediate predecessors. But with his desperation to project an air of cowboy manliness and his folksy pretension (“that was a heckuva thing”) he does almost seem to foreshadow the man who succeeded Clinton.

We get a few more paragraphs of Fitz’s backslappin’ bonhomie — “I want you to spend a night or two here with me and Wilma. … Right here at the White House” — and the president signs off.

Buck was only a little less overcome than Carpathia and Rosenzweig. He had long since lost his awe of U.S. presidents, especially this one, who insisted on being called Fitz. He had done a Newsmaker of the Year piece on Fitzhugh — Buck’s first, Fitz’s second. On the other hand, it wasn’t every day that the president called the room in which you sat.

It may seem strange that this is the first, and only, mention of the American president in this book. The Fitzhugh administration’s response to The Event and its aftermath are never discussed. Nor is there any mention of the American president’s reaction to the divine obliteration of the entire Russian arsenal and air force, which also occurred during Fitz’s time “in the saddle.”

The problem here, for Tim LaHaye and Jerry Jenkins, is that the PMD End Times master plan has very little to say about America’s role in the final days. This is the source of endless hand-wringing on the part of Bible “prophecy” enthusiasts. Variations of “What does the Bible say about America’s role in the End Times?” are among the most frequently asked questions at LeftBehind.com.

You won't go broke writing books about American in "Bible prophecy."

You won’t go broke writing books about American in “Bible prophecy.”

Their answer, such as it is, seems to be that America’s only role is maintain loyal support for Israel (the political state, not the people). Just like God, they say, we must stand by Israel, ensuring that it prospers right up until the end of the world (at which point, of course, it will be utterly destroyed because, you know, they’re Jews and not RTCs).

One byproduct of this answer is the unlikely alliance of America’s Christian right with the most hawkish Israeli factions. CBS News’ Bob Simon provides a good rundown of this dynamic in his report, “Zion’s Christian Soldiers.”

Simon, unfortunately, repeats unchallenged L&J’s indefensible claim that their complex and selectively allegorical interpretive scheme is based on reading the Bible “literally.” He characterizes the plot of Left Behind as “ripped from the pages of the Bible.” It’s nothing of the sort. The authors, instead, have ripped up the pages of the Bible and then reassembled some of the pieces to form an arbitrary, convoluted and internally inconsistent timeline.

Apart from that regrettable lapse, Simon’s report is an excellent summary of how the World’s Worst Books are influencing American foreign policy, and of why America’s rapture maniacs may not really be the best “best friends” for Israel to rely on. On the latter point, Simon quotes Gershom Gorenberg:

“The Jews die or convert. As a Jew, I can’t feel very comfortable with the affections of somebody who looks forward to that scenario,” says Gershom Gorenberg, who knows that scenario well.

Gorenberg is the author of The End of Days, a book about those Christian evangelicals who choose to read the Bible literally. “They don’t love real Jewish people. They love us as characters in their story, in their play, and that’s not who we are, and we never auditioned for that part, and the play is not one that ends up good for us.”

“If you listen to the drama they’re describing, essentially it’s a five-act play in which the Jews disappear in the fourth act.”

Uncategorized

Left Behind

Previous Post

January 6, 2017

Epiphany: Jesus wept

Next Post

January 9, 2017 Go and learn what this means -- the bad-faith 'biblical' defense of injustice (part 1)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What was the primary marriage dowry in Biblical times?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Precious stones Gold coins Livestock Land