‘A person who stands against everything that Christianity believes’

Last updated on: October 3, 2016 at 5:38 am by Fred Clark

‘A person who stands against everything that Christianity believes’ 2016-10-03T05:38:26-04:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Best-selling evangelical author and long-time Christianity Today columnist Philip Yancey, speaking in Madrid, responds to Spanish Christians asking about the American presidential election:

This reminds me of the earlier statement from another best-selling Christian author, Max Lucado, who denounced Donald Trump back in February. Both Yancey and Lucado are respected writers of many books beloved by white evangelicals. Both are also not known for having much of anything to say about politics — tending to focus mainly on pastoral concerns and personal spirituality. Both men also critique Trump from a similar perspective of traditional white evangelical piety — focusing on the candidate’s history of divorce, infidelity, gambling, and coarse bullying without much acknowledging his long history of racism and bigotry.

I’m not sure Lucado’s statement had much effect even among his biggest white evangelical fans. I suspect Yancey’s words will be similarly inconsequential. The 9-in-10 white evangelicals supporting Trump probably won’t consider the substance of Yancey’s argument — they’ll simply register that he’s turned against their anointed one, and consign him to the very long list of voices they no longer need to heed. (Yancey has already had to publicly reassure white evangelical gatekeepers that he was by no means endorsing Hillary Clinton or any other baby-killing Democrat,

You should really watch that video to see Yancey’s evident bewilderment — how difficult it is for him to comprehend what’s going on with his fellow white evangelicals, and how much this whole Trump phenomenon pains him. Here’s a rough transcript of his comments:

I am staggered that so many conservative or evangelical Christians would see a man who is a bully, who made his money by casinos, who has had several wives and several affairs, that they would somehow paint him as a hero, as someone that we could stand behind. I’ll just say it out loud: I cannot understand how evangel … I can understand, well, maybe you choose these policies that you support, OK, I understand that. But to choose a person who stands against everything that Christianity believes as the hero, the representative, one that we get behind enthusiastically is not something I understand at all.

And frankly, I think the church in the United States, the more it embeds with politics, the more it shall we say hitches a ride with politics, Europeans understand where that goes. The church and the state are seen like this [clasps hands together] and the state proves what it is, which is a flawed, sometimes corrupt, system, then the church is judged by that and rejected in the same way [as] the state. There are countries in Europe where, as you know, the church is set back for decades and decades because they have been stained by the way they sold their soul for power, I would say.

As the United States grows more and more “secular,” I tell the people there, I tell my people, we are becoming more like the fertile soil in which the early church did best, like the Roman Empire. This was a pagan, hostile society, and yet Christians stood out by being different. When you’re in a place like the United States or Europe in its recent past where the majority would claim to be Christians, but they don’t look — they look like everybody else — then people don’t understand what the gospel is. If they look radically different from the world around them, people can see that difference.

That last paragraph is interesting. I think his first-century analogy gets a bit garbled, but Yancey grasps an important point: [White] Christian nationalism and [white] Christian hegemony have created the idea that [white] Christianity is normal and normative here in our culture. And the result of that is that Christians “look like everybody else” — indistinct and indistinguishable.

Yancey realizes that’s not how things are supposed to be. He wants Christians to “look radically different from the world around them.” That’s good! But Yancey’s attempt to imagine what this radical difference might look like is itself shaped by that same homogenized hegemony of white Christianity. That circumscribes his attempts to describe “everything that Christianity believes” — leaving him able only to list things like being anti-gambling and anti-adultery.

Somehow such lists of the things that are supposed to make evangelical Christians “radically different” always wind up making evangelical Christianity sound like a less-demanding form of Mormonism.

I want to return to all this to explore how Yancey’s weirdly optimistic variation of the white evangelical narrative of decline is itself the explanation for the white evangelical Trump-worship that so confuses and disappoints him. But let’s save that for later.

Here let’s just note that Philip Yancey — author of The Jesus I Never Knew and of What’s So Amazing About Grace? and of dozens of other titles that line the shelves of white evangelical pastor’s all across America — has publicly reminded his readers that they’re about to go vote for a man who “stands against everything that Christianity believes.” And good for him for doing so.

This is a picture of Bob Ross painting Philip Yancey among some happy trees. This is not something that ever really happened, but it should have.

Bob Ross paints Philip Yancey among some happy trees. This is not something that ever really happened, but it should have.

evangelicals

Trump

Previous Post

October 2, 2016

Sunday favorites

Next Post

October 3, 2016 The danger of 'radically different'

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who led the Israelites into the Promised Land?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Moses Joshua Caleb Aaron