I don’t have any right to pick the Republican nominee

Last updated on: April 22, 2016 at 5:52 pm by Fred Clark

I don’t have any right to pick the Republican nominee 2016-04-22T17:52:27-04:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I’m confused by some of the complaining about so-called “closed primaries.” Pennsylvania’s primaries are next week, but it’s not accurate to say that “Pennsylvania” is holding elections. The Republican and Democratic Parties are holding elections to choose their nominees. Republicans are voting for Republican nominees and Democrats are voting for Democratic nominees. How else should that work?

I don’t have any say in who the members of the Republican Party will pick for their nominees because I am not a member of the Republican Party and I shouldn’t have any say in that. I also shouldn’t have any say in selecting candidates for the Libertarian Party, or the Constitution Party, or the Green Party, or any other party of which I am not a member. Likewise, Pennsylvania Republicans shouldn’t have any say in selecting the nominees for my party — a party they have chosen not to join.

The complaint seems to be that both parties are thereby “disenfranchising” those who have not chosen to join them. That’s just … odd. It’s akin to my claiming that I’m being disenfranchised when you go into the voting booth because I have no say in how you fill out your ballot. Your “closed” balloting on your own behalf is exclusionary! That makes no sense. It is not in any way unfair or unjust that I don’t have the right to meddle in the Republican nomination process. I’m not thereby being deprived of any right.

But what of “independents”? Well, they’re not Republicans either, so they also should not be interfering with Republicans’ selection process. Nor are they Democrats, or Libertarians, or Anti-Masonists or Greens — and having chosen not to belong to any of those groups, it makes no sense to argue they have a right to make decisions on those groups’ behalf.

Parties pick their own nominees. If you want to participate in any given party’s nomination process, join that party. Otherwise, what possible claim could you have to any right to choose on their behalf?

The complaint in New York was not that the state has a “closed” primary, but that the state makes it difficult for voters to join any party close to the election, and by the time many “independents” decided that they wanted to cease being lone wolves* and actually participate in one of the parties it was too late for them to register in time to cast a vote in the primaries.

OK, maybe New York wants to make it easier to switch parties. Maybe make it possible to do this on the same day as the primary. The tricky thing here is that this potentially opens the door to manipulative meddling and dirty tricks.

LaRouchies

We’ve learned to avoid LaRouchies outside the post office, but they’re harder to avoid when they sneak onto the ballot for local races in an “open” primary. (Wikimedia photo by Jeffrey J. Schwartz)

Think of Delaware in 2010. County executive Chris Coons was running unopposed for the Democratic nomination for the U.S. Senate, expected to be his party’s sacrificial lamb up against overwhelmingly popular Republican Rep. Mike Castle. Same-day party switching would’ve allowed all of Delaware’s Democrats to “join” the Republican Party for one day, just so they could cast their votes for the goofy religious-right whackjob outsider running against Castle in the GOP primary. Then they could all switch back for the general election, and Chris Coons — to everyone’s surprise — would wind up a U.S. senator.

The fact that Republicans actually did this to themselves — with more than 80 percent of them staying home assuming that Castle had it in the bag, allowing Christine O’Donnell to grab the party’s nomination with a narrow win in a very low turnout GOP primary — doesn’t change the fact that it would have been sleazy foul play for Delaware’s Democrats to manipulate the outcome of another party’s selection process.

Delaware’s (“closed”) primary process wasn’t set up in a way that allowed non-Republicans to interfere with that party’s selection of its nominee for the Senate race, but we’ve seen plenty of other “open” primary results that bear a strong whiff of such meddling. Alvin Greene — an eccentric unknown who didn’t actually campaign — won the Democratic nomination for U.S. Senate in South Carolina in 2010, going on to lose the general election in a landslide to Republican incumbent Sen. Jim DeMint, who had been unopposed in the state’s open primary.

This NPR report from last year looks at similar strange primary results — unknown absentee candidates who won without campaigning in Mississippi and Tennessee. Jessica Taylor notes that the Democratic Party in those states is weak and disorganized, and that all of these candidates may have benefited from having common names that would have been listed first alphabetically.

That’s all true, but so is this: Mississippi and Tennessee also have open primaries. Maybe these no-chance oddballs won those primaries because Democrats were lax and apathetic. But it’s also possible that they benefited from manipulation of an open primary system that allows and encourages cross-partisan sabotage.

I sympathize with part of the motivation for many of the complaints about “closed” primaries. I agree that party registration should be simple, accessible, and as open as possible, and that it’s better to remove as many hurdles as possible in the hopes of boosting participation in primary elections. (The turnout for the primary Christine O’Donnell won — around 14 percent if I remember correctly — was really disgraceful.) But I don’t want to open the door to trickery, exploitation and manipulation.

Next week, Pennsylvania Republicans will choose a Republican nominee for president and for senator and for many other state and county offices. I won’t have any say in that because I am not a Republican. Nor will Pennsylvania Republicans have any say in which candidates we Democrats nominate to run for any of those offices. I think that’s proper and fair.

– – – – – – – – – – – –

* Complaints about “closed” primaries are also sometimes a bit hard to swallow in that many of them come from the sort of “registered independent” voters who, frankly, are just annoying. I’m talking about the kind of people who express and possess a clear partisan preference, but who choose not to be identified with either the Republican or the Democratic parties because they want to be able to claim some kind of moral superiority over everyone else. Why are they “independent”? So they can tell people they’re independent. So they can condemn everyone else for all the complicity that comes with accepting the responsibility of making choices. These folks aren’t being “disenfranchised” by a closed primary system — they’ve chosen to disenfranchise themselves.

This is what Erik Loomis is getting at here:

If you wanted to vote for Bernie but couldn’t soil yourself with being a Democrat, your fault. Voting isn’t a consumer choice. It’s a compromise with reality. Registering as an independent is fine if you want to remain so pure you can’t be stained by whatever the Democrats choke up. But don’t complain that you couldn’t vote for the candidate you want to win.

class warfare

Previous Post

April 22, 2016

Left Behind Classic Fridays, No. 78: 'Buck, incognito'

Next Post

April 23, 2016 I hate this sunless Saturday

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month November 2026 October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who led the Israelites into the Promised Land?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Caleb Aaron Moses Joshua