Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

slacktivist

NRA: Funeral altar call

Last updated on: March 7, 2016 at 5:54 pm   by Fred Clark

NRA: Funeral altar call 2016-03-07T17:54:03-05:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Nicolae: The Rise of Antichrist; pp. 313-314

We come to one of those rare moments in which Tim LaHaye and Jerry Jenkins accurately convey something true-to-life with their setting and their characters. Rayford Steele is standing in the pulpit of the New Hope Village Church, delivering a eulogy for his friend and the church’s former pastor, Bruce Barnes. And then, abruptly, Rayford segues into an evangelistic presentation and a call to conversion.

The moment is awkward, cringe-inducing, and utterly familiar to anyone who’s ever been to a funeral service at a white evangelical church.

Evangelical churches usually tend to be good at many things: Youth groups, for example, and children’s programs, Vacation Bible School, small-group devotional Bible studies. Parking. But funerals are not our forté. The improvisational approach of most evangelical services doesn’t serve us well when it comes to funerals. Our anti-sacramental impulse isn’t well-suited to an occasion that calls for sacrament. This is an occasion that calls for liturgy and ritual, and those just aren’t things evangelicals are inclined or equipped to supply.

So, instead, evangelicals fall back onto something they are equipped to do — presenting an evangelistic message and a call for individual conversion. Given the premises of an otherworldly gospel with its primary focus on the afterlife, this makes a kind of urgent sense. A funeral is, after all, a potent reminder that life is fleeting, and if the most important thing in life is what happens afterwards, then this seems like an appropriate occasion to speak to that.

There won’t be a literal altar call, of course — inviting the unsaved to come forward doesn’t really work with a casket already crowding the space up front. But that casket serves as both a reminder of the importance of the message, and as a convenient pretext for it. There’s no need to invoke the Hypothetical Bus that might strike any one of us the moment we step outside when you’ve already got a real-live dead person right there in front of you. It’s also easy to frame this evangelistic message as the final wish of the departed — like one of those newspaper obituaries in which the recently deceased gets off a parting shot by urging everyone to vote not to re-elect so-and-so. “I know that if there’s one thing the departed would want you to know today …” etc.

On the other hand, the crowd assembled for an evangelical funeral service will likely be made up, overwhelmingly, of evangelical Christians — which is to say, of people who are already converted and “saved,” and who thus wouldn’t need to hear this evangelistic appeal. But that’s true of most settings in which evangelicals evangelize from the pulpit. Most of our altar calls are presented before crowds mostly consisting of people who’ve already visited that altar. That doesn’t make such evangelism entirely redundant because it still plays an important role in strengthening the bond of shared identity among the already-converted (liturgy and ritual, it turns out, aren’t that easy to escape). And the knowledge that this evangelistic message is sure to be presented makes the service an evangelistic tool for the members of that community. They can reach out to their unsaved friends, colleagues and acquaintances by inviting them to attend the funeral, knowing that this means they will hear the gospel and be given the opportunity to be saved.

That’s a plot-point here in Nicolae. Our heroes have invited Verna Zee — Buck Williams’ sensibly shod colleague and frenemy at Global Weekly, who remains stubbornly unsaved even after learning the well-kept secret of Buck’s faith. They’re hoping that she will come, hear Rayford’s evangelistic message, and thus get saved. This hope isn’t based on concern for Verna’s eternal fate as much as it is on the concern that, unless Verna converts, she may betray Buck’s secret to the forces of the Antichrist. So it’s more self-preservation than a desire to seek and to save the lost.

But still, Verna is one of the few unsaved people our heroes have bothered to know by name, and since they’re obliged to invite their unsaved friends to hear the gospel proclaimed at this funeral, they pretty much had to invite her.

It was still a very strange invitation, though. Verna never met Bruce Barnes and wouldn’t have any real reason to attend his memorial service. I suspect she agreed to come only because of Loretta, who kindly provided a home for her after she lost everything in the nuclear destruction of Chicago.* I imagine that Verna feels a kind of kinship with Loretta, who has been keeping New Hope organized and functional for the past 18 months while her boss traveled the world and wholly neglected his responsibilities and the day-to-day work of the church. Loretta did all the work and Bruce got all the credit, rarely acknowledging her except occasionally to remind her that she was his subordinate.

Loretta’s relationship with Bruce at New Hope Village Church, in other words, was almost exactly like Verna’s relationship with Buck Williams at Global Weekly. So I’d guess Verna accepted the invitation to this funeral out of respect for Loretta — and maybe to vicariously enjoy seeing Bruce buried as the next best thing to the funeral she’s really hoping to see.

Bruce Barnes, Rayford says in his eulogy, had explained to him “the way of salvation”:

Rayford now took the time, as he had on many occasions in Sunday school classes and testimony meetings, to go through that same simple plan.

Again, this will ring true for many of this book’s evangelical readers. They also have heard this “same simple plan” reviewed, or have reviewed it themselves, in “Sunday school classes and testimony meetings.” You won’t find a lot of unsaved people unfamiliar with that message in a Sunday school class. And, as all the testimonies presented at those “testimony meetings” attest, everybody there has already learned and followed that simple plan too.

Now, in a church sanctuary packed wall-to-wall with church-going church-members all thoroughly familiar with this message, Rayford prepares to offer it again. Because Verna might show up. And because maybe some other member of the congregation has invited some other unsaved person to come. And because maybe the ritual repetition of this message plays some other function besides reaching those who have never heard it before.

But before Rayford can explain the “simple plan of salvation,” he first has to explain what it is not:

Rayford said, “This has been the most misunderstood message of the ages. Had you asked people on the street five minutes before the Rapture what Christians taught about God and heaven, nine in ten would have told you that the church expected them to live a good life, to do the best they could, to think of others, to be kind, to live in peace. It sounded so good, and yet it was so wrong. How far from the mark!”

Thus, Calvinism. Those familiar with this sort of ferociously Reformed version of the gospel can anticipate what follows. But filtered through Tim LaHaye and Jerry Jenkins, as voiced by their sock-puppet Rayford Steele, what follows is even worse than that.

We’ll get to that next time. Here we’ll just note that this is the inevitable downside of an otherworldly “gospel” that points to the afterlife as the most important thing: It can’t help but make this life, and this entire world, seem less important, and thus unimportant.

“For God so loved the world …” says John 3:16. For LaHaye and Jenkins, “loving the world” is a mistake — an error of misplaced priorities and a distraction from the things that really matter.

– – – – – – – – – – –

* The nuclear destruction of the city of Chicago happened less than two weeks ago in this story, but here again we see how it has already un-happened. No one here in the suburbs remembers that any more or gives it a second thought. It has had no lasting effect on their lives. It carries no consequences for their plans, no emotional aftermath, no care or concern at all.

Chicago gets nuked and, just days later, Rayford is preaching at the funeral of someone who died before that attack, treating this person’s death as exceptional and extraordinary. He segues into his evangelistic message and it makes no mention of the millions who were murdered so very nearby so very recently. That’s inhuman and impossible. It’s also terrible preaching.

In the months after 9/11, the repercussions of that event were, understandably, a reference point in every evangelistic sermon preached in America. In late 2001, if you went to an evangelical church thousands of miles away in the remotest corner of New Mexico, the sermon’s evangelistic message would likely include some mention of that event and of the 3,000 lives lost on that day. Those attacks aren’t part of the fictional world of these books, which were written in the late 1990s, but L&J’s fictional Antichrist just flattened those towers a few chapters ago in the nuclear assault that destroyed New York along with Chicago and nearly every other major American city. Yet here, just days later and just a short drive from the devastation, none of that calamity seems worthy of mention in Rayford’s funeral gospel presentation.

Wrigley08

The Friendly Confines (Wikimedia commons photo by Jblesage)

That’s Wrigley Field. Here in our story, that no longer exists. It was destroyed along with all the buildings you see in the background and the rest of the city of Chicago. And all the people pictured here would have been killed. But now, in this same story, just a few days later and just a few miles away, Rayford Steele presents his evangelistic message, making no mention of any of that. Impossible.

Left Behind

Left Behind

Previous Post



March 6, 2016

The national ID card and the Mark of the Beast

Next Post



March 8, 2016 Credit scores and the Mark of the Beast


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What four things does the Pale Horse in Revelations bring upon the earth?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Sword, famine, plague, and wild beasts Storms, earthquakes, floods, and darkness Silence, fire, blood, and pestilence Wrath, power, redemption, and judgment

Related posts from slacktivist

Family

Hal Lindsey is gone (the Late, Great Planet...

slacktivist

Family

Can't seem to get it through my head

slacktivist

Family

For Buffy and Carl so loved the world

slacktivist

Family

Sex and the end of the world

slacktivist

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian

Sunday Readings: Love God and Neighbor

The readings for the Thirtieth Sunday in Ordinary Time focus on one...

When to Use AI and When Not To

Drawing on my new book with Trevor Sutton, "Irreplaceable: Humanity, Vocation, and...

Crabs in a Bucket: Why Evangelicalism Won’t Let...

There’s an old saying about crabs in a bucket. You don’t need...

Chapter 10, Elena: Progress

Open and Relational Theology & Social Psychology About this series: This series...

How Should We ‘Use’ Early Christians?

In his prefatory letter to the king of France in his Institutes...

Christa Pike, Human Sacrifice

Tennessee wasn't just trying to kill Pike. It was trying to perform...

view all Progressive Christian blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube