BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian
Beliefs
- Buddhist
- Catholic
- Contemplative
- Evangelical
- General Christian
- Hindu
- Jewish
- Latter-day Saint
- More Voices
- Muslim
- New Visions
- Pagan
- Progressive Christian
Topics
- Religion News
- Food and Religion
- Sports and Religion
- Religious Art
- Religious Music and Entertainment
- Religious Events
- History and Religion
- Style and Religion
- Politics and Religion
- Women in Religion
- Recreation Outdoors and Religion
- Business Finance and Religion
- Careers Workplace and Religion
- Education and Religion
- Family Parenting and Religion
- Health Fitness and Religion
- Home and Religion
- Relationships and Religion
- Technology and Religion
- Travel and Religion
Columnists
- Buddhist Columnists
- Business Finance and Religion Columnists
- Careers Workplace and Religion Columnists
- Catholic Columnists
- Contemplative Columnists
- Education and Religion Columnists
- Evangelists Columnists
- Family Parenting and Religion Columnists
- General Christian Columnists
- Health Fitness and Religion Columnists
- Hindu Columnists
- History and Religion Columnists
- Home and Religion Columnists
- Jewish Columnists
- More Voices Columnists
- Latter Day Columnists
- Muslim Columnists
- New Visions Columnists
- Nonreligious Columnists
- Pagan Columnists
- Politics and Religion Columnists
- Progressive Columnists
- Recreation Outdoors and Religion Columnists
- Relationships and Religion Columnists
- Religion News Columnists
- Religious Art Columnists
- Religious Events Columnists
- Religious Music and Entertainment Columnists
- Sports and Religion Columnists
- Style and Religion Columnists
- Technology and Religion Columnists
- Travel and Religion Columnists
- Women in Religion Columnists
Resource Library
- 2026 Calendar
- Library of World Religions
- The 100 Most Holy Places on Earth
- Patheos Answers
- Podcasts
- Videos
- Faith Leaders Database
- Anglican Episcopalian
- Bahai
- Baptist
- Buddhism
- Christianity
- Confucianism
- Eastern Orthodoxy
- Hinduism
- Holiness and Pentecostal
- ISKCON
- Islam
- Judaism
- Lutheran
- Methodist
- The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
- New Age
- Paganism
- Presbytarian and Reformed
- Protestantism
- Religion Behind the Scenes
- Roman Catholic
- Scientology
- Shia Islam
- Sikhism
- Sufism
- Sunni Islam
- Taoism
- Zen
- See all religions
Research Tools
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
- Trending:
- Forgiveness
- |
- Marriage
- |
- Consciousness
- |
- Death Penalty
- |
- Election
- |
- Halloween
- Home
- Progressive Christian
- NRA: Bruce Barnes’ body lies a mouldering somewhere
NRA: Bruce Barnes’ body lies a mouldering somewhere
Last updated on: February 22, 2016 at 6:48 pm by Fred Clark
NRA: Bruce Barnes’ body lies a mouldering somewhere 2016-02-22T18:48:25-05:00 Fred Clark
Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.
Nicolae: The Rise of Antichrist; pp. 308-310
Bruce Barnes died in the final pages of the previous book in the series. He had contracted some fever while preaching the bad news of his gospel overseas somewhere and was rushed to the local hospital on his return to the former United States. Bruce was in a coma at Northwest Community Hospital in Arlington Heights when that facility was suddenly and inexplicably attacked by the Antichrist’s Global Community Air Force.
I’m still not sure whether Bruce died from the destruction of the hospital or if he coincidentally died from his tropical disease just before or during the bombing. Either way, though, that’s where and when he died, and where Rayford Steele apparently last saw Bruce’s body, lying under a sheet in a “makeshift outdoor morgue,” just one victim among countless others — “body after body laid out in a neat row and covered.”
That was more than 300 pages ago. How much time has passed, story-wise, is a bit fuzzy. It’s a couple of weeks, at least — time enough for Rayford to have returned to New Babylon for a bit before flying back to Milwaukee, and time enough for Buck Williams to have another of his oddly detached spy-thriller subplot adventures.
Now, let’s say around two weeks later, Bruce’s body is back at New Hope Village Church. It’s the morning of his Sunday-service memorial and Rayford is getting ready to preach his big sermon:
Fifty minutes before the service [Rayford] signaled the funeral director to move the casket into the sanctuary and open it.
Rayford was in Bruce’s office when the funeral director hurried back to him. “Sir, are you sure you still want me to do that? The sanctuary is full to overflowing already.”
Rayford didn’t doubt him but followed him to look for himself. He peeked through the platform door. It would have been inappropriate to open the casket in front of all those people. Had Bruce’s body been on display, waiting for them when they arrived, that would have been one thing. “Just wheel the closed coffin out there,” Rayford said. “We’ll schedule a viewing later.”
This later viewing will be scheduled by someone, probably Loretta. But Rayford, as Bruce’s extra-special friend, decides to have an extra-special viewing before then, just for himself.
As Rayford headed back to the office, he and the funeral director came upon the casket and the attendants in an otherwise empty corridor that led to the platform. Rayford was overcome with a sudden urge. “Could you open it just for me, briefly?”
“Certainly, sir, if you would avert your eyes a moment.”
Rayford turned his back and heard the lid open and the movement of the material.
“All right, sir,” the director said.
Here’s my question: Where has Bruce Barnes been all this time?
That’s really two questions, one logistical, the other theological. And the authors don’t seem to have given much thought to either one.
Back at the end of the previous book, Rayford had asked a nurse at the bombed-out hospital to help him find Bruce’s body. She lifted the sheet to show Rayford just long enough for him to conclude that, yep, that’s Bruce and, yep, he’s dead. At which point Rayford turned around and left, heading back to where Buck, Chloe, and Amanda were waiting so they could have one of their trademark end-of-the-book group hugs.
This passage, 300-some pages into the following book, is the first mention of a funeral director — or of any attempt to keep track of Bruce’s body in the intervening time.
I don’t mean to be morbid here, but that intervening time, you’ll recall, also involved the nuclear destruction of O’Hare International Airport and the entire city of Chicago. It also involved the nuclear destruction of New York, Washington, Dallas, San Francisco, and apparently almost every other major city, although those mass-murdering calamities wouldn’t have the same effect on the point I’m trying to make here, which is that the whole system for handling, managing and storing the remains of the recently deceased might be a bit overtaxed just now in and around Cook County, Illinois.
That would be true even if we were dealing only with the mass-casualty incident at the hospital, where Bruce’s body was last seen laid out along with every other recoverable victim in that attack — every patient and all but three employees, we were told. The bodies of those victims couldn’t be taken to the morgue at the hospital because the hospital was gone — a smoldering pile of rubble. And they couldn’t be taken to the Cook County ME’s office on Harrison Street in Chicago because there’s no longer any Cook County ME’s office, no longer any Harrison Street, and no longer any Chicago.
Apparently someone, probably Loretta, arranged to have Bruce’s body collected from the hospital and stored by some funeral home in the wholly unscathed suburbs near the church. Maybe that’s possible, but it would have been far different from the routine procedure described here in the pages of Nicolae. Every such facility would, after all, be dealing with an unprecedented flood of bodies — a worse crisis for them than even all the plane crashes and automobile accidents that overwhelmed them in the aftermath of the Event.
And so, once again, the weirdest thing about this scene in the book is the impossible mundane normalcy of it. All the incomprehensibly huge events of the previous two weeks of this story no longer seem to have happened at all. “The sanctuary is full to overflowing” of people mourning the death of Bruce Barnes — and exclusively the death of Bruce Barnes, not the deaths of any of the hundreds of others who died alongside him nor any of the millions of others who died nearby in the following days. Those people aren’t being mourned at all, by anyone, in this book. It’s as though no one other than Bruce Barnes had recently died.
The funeral director acts as though Bruce’s is the only funeral he has to deal with because, abruptly, it is. All that stuff that just happened has just as suddenly unhappened.
Saying that continuity and world-building are not Jerry Jenkins’ strong suit would be like saying the Great Wall of China is not short, but, again, this epic failure of world-building isn’t entirely Jenkins’ fault. It’s a necessary aspect of the “Bible prophecy” framework provided for him by Tim LaHaye. In LaHaye’s scheme, the End Times consists of a string of unconnected, discrete events that must occur, in sequence, in fulfillment of “Bible prophecy.” That sequence of events is unimaginable and unportrayable if we stop to dwell on the consequences and implications of any of them in turn. The fulfillment of one prophecy in the sequence would seem to preclude the possible fulfillment of the next one. I suppose a more imaginative writer might have viewed this as a challenge and worked to come up with ways to depict this sequence of events such that one flowed into the next. Jenkins wasn’t up to that challenge, so instead he took the extraordinary measure of having each prophesied event happen in a self-contained vacuum, then having it un-happen as his story moves briskly along to the next item in the sequence.
The result is, frankly, bewildering. Is Chicago still there? We simply don’t know. A few chapters ago we read that it was destroyed, and during those chapters, Chicago was no more. But here, now, on page 310, we readers cannot be sure that’s still the case. It often isn’t in these books. Whole cities rise and fall and reappear. Nations are disbanded and reformed in the flip of the page between chapters.
If a tree falls in the forest, and the authors later forget it fell, is it still standing? I have no idea.
But the logistical question of where Bruce has been all this time is not as difficult, for the authors, as the far trickier theological aspect of that question.
Think back to all of those piles of clothes (and prosthetics, toupees, etc.) left behind after the Rapture, when all the real, true Christians were whisked off to Heaven — body and soul. That bodily Rapture corresponds with the Christian belief in a bodily resurrection, along the lines of what we Christians believe the book of Job affirms in that passage that “amazed” Buck Williams last week: “I know that my redeemer liveth, and that he shall stand at the latter day upon the earth: And though after my skin worms destroy this body, yet in my flesh shall I see God” (quoted here in the KJV because Handel).
But Bruce Barnes’ post-Rapture death raises the spectre, as it were, of the body-soul dualism that L&J seemed to reject with their bodily Rapture:
Bruce looked less alive and even more like the shell Rayford knew this body to be than he had under the shroud outside the demolished hospital where Rayford had found him. Whether it was the lighting, the passage of time, or his own grief and fatigue, Rayford did not know. This, he knew, was merely the earthly house of his dear friend. Bruce was gone. The likeness that lay here was just a reflection of the man he once was. Rayford thanked the director and headed back to the office.
He was glad he had taken that last look. It wasn’t that he needed closure, as so many said of such a viewing. He had simply feared that the shock of Bruce appearing so lifeless at a corporate viewing might render him speechless. But it didn’t now.
Manly men don’t need “closure,” of course. That’s for the womenfolk. But if “Bruce was gone” and all that was left was the “shell” of his “earthly house,” then where did Bruce go?* If this isn’t him, but merely the mortal coil he’s shuffled off, then where is he? And what is he — this him that isn’t this?
That’s a tricky question for all Christians, of course, but it’s particularly hard for Rapture-enthusiasts like LaHaye and Jenkins. They can’t do what the rest of us do, which is turn to that strange little passage in 1 Thessalonians in which Paul tells us not to lose hope for those who have died, in which he seems to say that they have gone on ahead, but we will be reunited with them some day. “Encourage one another with these words,” Paul says. But Rapture-enthusiasts cannot do that because, for them, this passage is about the Rapture, and not about “those who have died.”
In fact, for Rapture-enthusiasts, almost every biblical passage about death is reinterpreted as Rapture instructions. And that leaves them sorely lacking in knowing what to say or think about death when they encounter it.
If you really want to take a dive through the looking glass, start googling around to see what Rapture-believers think about what happens to the souls of everyone who dies before the Rapture, and to see the often heated arguments about whether or not that’s the same as what happens to the souls of those, like Bruce, who die during the Rapture. You’ll find a darkly fascinating mix of emphatic certainty and wild speculation, with no distinction between the two. (Here’s a Google search for “Rapture + cremation,” that’ll get you started if you enjoy that sort of thing.)
I suspect that part of the reason L&J only touch on this vaguely here is because they’re hoping to avoid getting bogged down in this whole ongoing when-do-which-souls-go-where argument within the “Bible-prophecy” guild. But I suspect the main reason that the disposition of Bruce’s soul is addressed so vaguely here is that LaHaye and Jenkins don’t really know what they think about that.
Where has Bruce been this whole time? Whether we treat that question logistically or theologically, the authors cannot answer it because they haven’t given it any thought. At all.
– – – – – – – – – – – – – –
* It’s perfectly fair, at this point, for you to ask what I think happened to Bruce when he died, and thus what happens to the rest of us. The short answer is that, like everyone else, I don’t know. The undiscover’d country from whose bourn no traveller returns and all that. But if you want to know what I think or suspect/expect/believe/hope, well, have you ever read Flatland? …
Previous Post

February 22, 2016
The dominionist is also a goldbug
Next Post

February 23, 2016 Driscoll and Trump: A tale of two bullies
Browse Our Archives
Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized
Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003
Follow Us!
TAKE THE
Religious Wisdom Quiz
What two things does Paul say about those who preach a different gospel?
Select your answer to see how you score.
They are false teachers They have fallen from grace They will face judgment Let them be under God's condemnation
Related posts from slacktivist
Hal Lindsey is gone (the Late, Great Planet...
Can't seem to get it through my head
For Buffy and Carl so loved the world
TRENDING AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian
"The Price of Faith? The Fire of Covenant!"
This week's installment of our on-going series of Becoming Brigham mini-documentaries...
How Do You Actually Let Go of Your...
Have you ever felt so worried you couldn’t even sleep? Worry doesn’t...
Cycling down the widening gyre
The thing about laying off a bunch of writers and editors is...
In the early fourth century, an emperor decided to convert to Christianity....
NBA, Kalshi, and Polymarket: A Risky New Partnership
The NBA has officially entered the growing prediction market industry through new...
Ernesto Martinez: Love's Battle Against an Execution Date
Arizona Wants a Date to Kill Ernesto Martinez In the first days...
view all Progressive Christian blogs
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
- About Us
- 2026 Calendar
- Videos
- Podcasts
- Library of World Religions
- Faith In Media Tracker
- Advertise With Us
- Write for Us
- Privacy Policy
- Terms of Service
- Do Not Sell My Data
- Contact Us
- Radiant Digital
- Manage Newsletter Subscriptions
- Unsubscribe From Notifications
- Sitemap
Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.
Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In












